Maurits Cornelis Escher, also known as “Mauk”, was the fifth and youngest child of Sarah and George Escher. He had a comfortable middle-class life in the Netherlands, but eventually settled in the Dutch village of Baarn in 1941. Despite missing the Italian landscape, Escher felt at home in Switzerland, Belgium, and The Netherlands. In 1935, political instability in Europe forced the Escher family to move to Switzerland, Belgium, and eventually back to the Netherlands.
The rise of Fascism in the mid-1930s led the Eschers to leave Italy in the mid-1930s. They moved to the Netherlands, where they were unhappy with their situation. By 1937, the family decided to move to Brussels, Belgium, where Escher began creating woodcuts based on the concept. Escher was inspired by the landscapes in Italy but was unhappy in Switzerland. In 1937, the family moved to Uccle (Ukkel), where Escher created his first graphic work, a linoleum cut of his father, G. A. Escher.
In 1934, Escher and his family traveled to the seashore, Belgium, Ghent, and Bruges. His work was doing well in the US, and his print work was successful.
Leaving Italy in 1935 was even more cathartic for Escher, who had grown uncomfortable with the rise of fascism and World War II. He lived in Rome from 1923 to 1935, when he and his family were forced to relocate due to the illness of his two children and rising fascism in Italy.
In 1941, the Escher family moved to Belgium, which became their home until the invading German army forced them to flee. These personal circumstances, partly due to the brewing war, were responsible for Escher turning inward for vision. In mid-1937, the Escher family lived in Rome, and their son Giorgio Arnaldo Escher was born.
In 1935, the political climate in Italy became unacceptable to Escher, leading the family to leave Italy and settle in Switzerland. Escher’s interest in landscapes began to die away after leaving Italy, and he is now living in Belgium, his latest attempt at making a new home after leaving Italy in disgust.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| M. C. Escher | In 1937 the family moved again, to Uccle (Ukkel), a suburb of Brussels, Belgium. World War II forced them to move in January 1941, this time to … | en.wikipedia.org |
| M.C. Escher — Life and Work | They resided in Italy until 1935, when growing political turmoil forced them to move first to Switzerland, then to Belgium. In 1941, with World War II under way … | nga.gov |
| Timeline | Museum Escher in The Palace | Concerned about their children’s health and the rise of fascism in Italy, the Eschers decide to move from Italy to Switzerland on 4 July. | escherinhetpaleis.nl |
📹 M.C. Escher ~ Documentary
Did Albrecht Durer Go To Italy?
Albrecht Dürer, born in Nuremberg on May 21, 1471, embarked on two pivotal trips to Italy between 1494-1495 and again from 1505 to 1507. His first journey commenced shortly after his marriage, motivated partly by a plague outbreak in Nuremberg. In Venice, he absorbed Renaissance ideals on human anatomy, classical proportions, and techniques for depicting light. Dürer documented his travels through hundreds of drawings, letters, and diaries, reflecting a scientifically grounded artistic perspective.
His exposure to Italian art profoundly shaped his oeuvre; he became a renowned figure in Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy, gaining accolades even from art historian Giorgio Vasari, known for his limited appreciation of non-Tuscan artists. Dürer's intricate paintings and engravings exemplify the Northern Renaissance's interest in detail and the Italian Renaissance's grandeur, as he blended cinquecento monumentality with German naturalism. His travels also took him to Colmar, Basel, and Strasbourg before his significant stays in Venice.
Dürer never aimed to compete with Italian masters; instead, he sought to synthesize their influences into his unique artistic voice. By 1506, Dürer was already recognized for his engravings and woodcuts. Throughout these transformative journeys, Dürer's commitment to integrating the classical heritage into his work left a lasting impact on both Italy's culture and his artistic legacy.
What Made Escher Famous?
M. C. Escher, a renowned Dutch graphic artist (1898-1972), is celebrated for his intricate impossible drawings, including famous pieces like "Ascending and Descending" and "Relativity." His unique style combines elements of mathematics with visual artistry, exemplifying the interplay between space, perspective, and reality. In addition to his well-known works, Escher created transformative prints such as "Metamorphosis I, II, III," "Air and Water I," and "Reptiles," showcasing his fascination with metamorphosis and optical illusion.
While works like "Drawing Hands" illustrate the paradox of self-referentiality, still others, such as "Day and Night," gained remarkable popularity, with over 650 copies made. Despite his artistic brilliance, Escher's work was not widely recognized during his lifetime, though it later gained admirers like Stanley Kubrick and Mick Jagger. Born in Leeuwarden, Escher was a versatile artist, engaging in various forms of printmaking including lithographs and woodcuts, which often presented bizarre optical effects.
Throughout his career, he exhibited his works over 319 times, primarily featuring his Italian prints. Escher’s legacy endures, reflecting his mastery in blending art with mathematics to create stunning visual experiences.
Where Did Escher Live In Arnhem?
M. C. Escher, born on June 17, 1898, in Leeuwarden, was the youngest son of civil engineer George Arnold Escher and his second wife, Sara Gleichman. The family resided in "Princessehof," a grand house that would later become a museum for Escher's works. In 1903, they moved to Arnhem, where Escher spent most of his childhood. Living with four older brothers, he struggled with health issues and academic performance, attending both primary and secondary school until 1918. Despite not excelling in many subjects, he showed a talent for drawing.
After failing his final exam and experiencing a brief stint in Delft, Escher began studying architecture at the School of Architecture and Decorative Arts in Haarlem in 1919. His interest in graphic art flourished, leading to the creation of intricate prints characterized by surreal optical and conceptual illusions. Throughout his life, despite his growing popularity, Escher remained relatively unrecognized in the art world, particularly in his home country.
In 1941, with World War II impacting Europe, Escher returned to the Netherlands, settling in Baarn, where he continued to work until shortly before his death. His prolific career established him as a significant figure in the world of artistic printmaking.
Who Was The Wife Of M.C. Escher?
Maurits Cornelis Escher, born on June 17, 1898, in Leeuwarden, Netherlands, was the youngest son of civil engineer George Arnold Escher and his second wife, Sara Gleichman. He moved to Arnhem in 1903, where he pursued carpentry and piano lessons. During his artistic journey, he traveled extensively through Italy, leading to a significant encounter with Jetta Umiker in Ravello in 1923. They married in Viareggio on June 12, 1924, and settled in Rome, where their first son, George, was born in July 1926. They welcomed two more sons, Arthur and Jan, in 1928 and 1938, respectively.
Escher’s creativity flourished during these years as he worked on engravings and prints inspired by his surroundings. However, the political climate in Italy forced the family to leave in 1935, first moving to Switzerland and then to Belgium. Jetta, a significant part of Escher's life, supported his artistic endeavors and played an essential role in their family life.
Escher is celebrated for his elaborate prints featuring optical illusions and complex perspectives, reflecting his unique artistic vision. He passed away on March 27, 1972, leaving behind a remarkable legacy influenced significantly by his wife and his experiences in Italy.
Where Did Escher Live During WW2?
In 1941, as World War II escalated, M. C. Escher relocated to Baarn, Netherlands, where he would live until his passing in 1972. His move was prompted by the German occupation of Brussels and the dire circumstances faced by his teacher de Mesquita, who perished in a concentration camp. Throughout this period, Escher's art evolved, focusing on subjects like Rome and the Italian countryside which he had previously drawn inspiration from during his years living in Italy. Around this time, his relationship with his wife Jetta deteriorated, leading her to move to Switzerland to reside with their son, Jan.
Escher, born on June 17, 1898, in Leeuwarden, became renowned for his intricate prints that encapsulated optical illusions and impossible spaces. The formative years in Baarn saw the creation of many of his iconic works inspired by the geometry of Alhambra's mosaics, which he had visited in the 1920s and '30s. Despite the challenges of the war, Baarn provided a sense of belonging for Escher, allowing him to continue his artistic endeavors.
The artistic journey of Escher was marked by transience, but his affinity for geometric patterns and surreal imagery gained prominence during his time in the Netherlands, especially under the shadows of World War II.
Who Did M.C. Escher Marry?
Maurits Cornelis Escher married Jetta Umiker on 12 June 1924 in Viareggio, Italy. The couple settled in Rome in the summer of 1925, welcoming their first son, Giorgio Arnaldo Escher, the following year. Born the youngest of five boys to civil engineer George Escher and his second wife, Sarah Gleichman, Maurits experienced a challenging childhood marked by illness, including time spent in a convalescent home. He received an extensive education that included carpentry.
Escher's marriage to Jetta significantly influenced his artistic journey, shifting his focus and inspiring his work. Their early married life involved settling into their new apartment in Rome, which they moved into after purchasing their home in October 1924. They lived in Italy until 1935, when political unrest prompted their relocation to Switzerland and then to Belgium. Escher's experiences in the Mediterranean, particularly his admiration for the Moor-designed Alhambra Palace in Spain, inspired his later artistic style.
They met in 1923 while Escher was traveling through Italy, which set the foundation for their relationship and his burgeoning interest in unique geometric patterns. Escher, often called Mauk by his family, was not just an artist but also a devoted husband and father during this formative period of his life.
Was Escher Left-Handed?
M. C. Escher, a renowned Dutch graphic artist born in 1898, was notably left-handed. During his schooling, he faced pressure to conform to right-handed practices, a common approach at the time, which did not significantly hinder his abilities. This forced adaptation led him to develop proficiency with both hands, a skill valuable for a graphic artist dealing with complex imagery. Escher's left-handedness places him alongside illustrious predecessors like Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and Albrecht Dürer, creating a notable lineage of left-handed genius in the arts.
Though lacking formal mathematical training, Escher’s artwork—characterized by intricate optical illusions and puzzles—exhibits profound mathematical insight, stemming from his intuitive understanding. He created an extensive portfolio comprising 448 wood engravings, linocuts, lithographs, and over 2000 drawings. In addition to his primary art, Escher illustrated books and designed various practical items like carpets and banknotes. His famous lithograph, "Drawing Hands," visually encapsulates his unique perspective on duality and perspective.
Despite being highly intelligent, Escher struggled academically, ultimately failing his final exams. His work and legacy as a left-handed artist continue to be celebrated today, particularly on International Left-Handers' Day.
How Did The War Affect Escher'S Life?
The Nazi persecution of Jews had a profound impact on Dutch graphic artist M. C. Escher, especially after the death of his mentor, Samuel de Mesquita, in Auschwitz in 1944. This personal connection to the atrocities prompted Escher to assist in transferring Mesquita's works to the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam. Throughout the war, Escher became increasingly pessimistic about humanity and found solace in creating imaginary scenes rather than reality-based artwork.
Despite the challenges, including the strain of his wife's mental health and the political turmoil in Italy, Escher's creativity persisted. He refused to align with Nazi-supported cultural initiatives and expressed contempt for the occupiers. After relocating to Baarn in 1941, he struggled with inspiration and health issues that limited his work. Post-war, Escher was influenced by the mezzotint technique, leading to notable prints like 'Gallery' (1946). Throughout his life, he remained perplexed by his popularity among youth counterculture, finding it at odds with his artistic vision formed under the weight of war's horrors.
Where Did The Escher Family Live?
Maurits Cornelis Escher was born on June 17, 1898, in Leeuwarden, Friesland, Netherlands. He was the youngest son of civil engineer George Arnold Escher and Sara Gleichman. Moving from Leeuwarden to Arnhem in 1903, Escher had a difficult school experience but found solace in art classes. After marrying Jetta Umiker in 1924, the couple lived in Rome until 1935. Political turmoil in Italy prompted their relocation, first to Chateau-d'Oex, Switzerland, then to Ukkel, a suburb of Brussels.
They spent two years in Switzerland before moving to Belgium in August 1937, where their third son was born. The family faced significant upheaval when the Germans invaded Belgium in May 1940. They moved to Baarn in the Netherlands in early 1941, seeking refuge from the war. Escher, who found inspiration in Italian landscapes, struggled with his adjustment to life in Switzerland and was homesick. During their time in Baarn, the family faced further challenges, including the requisitioning of their home by the Germans in 1943, leading to their temporary asylum in 'villa Ekeby'.
Despite the turmoil of World War II, this period influenced Escher's artistic development significantly. Escher's creations, characterized by intricate detail and optical illusions, emerged from his formative experiences, setting a foundation for his later success as a renowned graphic artist before his death on March 27, 1972, in Laren, North Holland.
How Many Siblings Did MC Escher Have?
Maurits Cornelis Escher, commonly known as M. C. Escher, was born on June 17, 1898, in Leeuwarden, Netherlands. He was the youngest son of civil engineer George Arnold Escher and his second wife, Sara Gleichman, and grew up with four older brothers: Arnold, Johan, Berend, and Edmond. The family relocated to Arnhem in 1903, where he attended primary and secondary school until 1918. Escher had a keen interest in art, particularly in woodcuts, lithographs, and mezzotints inspired by mathematics.
In 1924, he married Jetta Umiker, and they had three sons: Giorgio Arnaldo, Arthur, and Jan. The family later settled in Rome, where Escher created many of his renowned works that feature intricate patterns and optical illusions.
Escher's unique artistic style earned him recognition as a master of optical art; his detailed prints created bizarre visual effects that captivated audiences. In 1925, tragedy struck when a mountaineering accident claimed the life of his brother, which influenced his work significantly. Escher passed away on March 27, 1972, in Laren, Netherlands. His legacy endures through his influential art, characterized by mathematical themes and extraordinary visual complexity.
📹 Escher’s impossible staircases, an exhibition in Naples
Maurits Cornelis Escher’s work has arrived in Naples. The visionary Dutch genius is famous for his impossible perspectives and …
As a very young child I never used to draw the usual things. My school books were covered in little cubes. When I first saw an Escher in my tweens I was blown away. And the amazement at the revolutionary and deeply meaningful nature of Escher’s work becomes even greater as I get closer to fifty. His art goes beyond revolutionary and beautiful. It’s actually metaphysical.
At a time when Western art was difficult to access in my reclusive Himalayan country, my sister went to England and returned with a book of Escher’s works. It captivated my 14 year old mind. 35 years later, it still does. I had so many questions. Thank you for this great docu. I now know the man better.
I became mesmerized by his work about 1970, and until this article, I assumed he was a German who had died 50 yrs earlier. Imagine, now, how wonderful to see a ‘modern’ film of such a handsome man, speaking Dutch, the language of artistic geniuses & innovators. The best possible form of autobiography. Thank you so much!
I discovered Escher in primary school while reading a biology book that had a chapter on optical illusions and have been always fascinated by his art. When I studied architecture we constantly used him as base for a lot of graphic exercises and then when I became an architect we started using his art as a regular source of inspiration. Being able to do what he does with just pencil and paper will never cease to mesmerize me.
I chose Escher for my first year graphic design course main assignment. Missed a lot of this information though. It was really eye opening his work is true genius, I guess he was lucky to have his father support him financially. It is one thing I did not know about from my research. To think he could do that because of his fathers provision. He had a wonderful father to do that. The others in the family, his family life must have been core reason for success.
There is an elegant collection of essays and reproductions of Escher’s works in The World of M C Escher curated by J L Locher. In addition, Mathematician Douglas Hofstadter wrote a remarkable treatise on the human thought process entitled Gödel Escher and Bach, linking them as a metaphorical fugue on minds and machines. Escher’s work is used in fractal geometry to create computer art and animation. We are fortunate to have an accessible record of such a visionary.
I first learned of Escher while at Columbia College in 1970, when a classmate friend took me by the hand and almost dragged me to the nearest bookshop where he’d seen an Escher book on display. My friend had seen one or two of my early efforts in art and knew I’d dig Escher. A great documentary – as much as I’ve been a life-long fan, I had no idea of what he did in his earlier life, in Italy (where I live since 1996 and which I will never leave), before the work which made him world-famous. After M.C. Escher was made, they broke the mold.
La verdad no conocía a fondo, al artista, aunque hace mucho tiempo vi en publicaciones de unas revistas, su obra la cual me dejo imprecionado, no lo volví a ver nunca más, y ni sabía de quien se trataba, con este ducumental biografíco de su vida y su obra, quedo complacido, de saber que fue un artista de vanguardia, muy prolifico un sus creaciones, de gran complejidad, la objetividad y la subjetivad de las cosas reales que represento, mi enhorabuena, saludos desde Quito…..
Fascinating documentary. Escher has always been one of my favorite artists. I’ve seen a number of documentaries on him, but this went into far more depth of the man himself rather than just concentrating on his art. I learned a lot about this complex man and his emerging genius. It’s a real lesson in human psychology. “Victory belongs to those that believe in it the most, and believe in it the longest” – Randall Wallace
As a budding artist, in junior high and high school, I was aware of Escher’s art by time I was 13, in 1966. I eventually became a Fine Arts print maker, studying that in college and grad school. I tried my hand at all methods of print making. Wood cuts, etchings and engravings, stone lithography, and silk screen printing, also known as Serigraphy. Pop Art was all the rage when I went off to college and that was what I chose to take as my inspiration. Silk screen printing was the best medium for expressing one’s self in that style, and Andy Warhol made good use of that medium. Escher’s style and designs were always available to look at, and many books with his art were ones I owned.
What a brilliant documentary. I was transported into the mysteries of the universe and mankind. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Reminds of Yayoi Kusama’s infinity mirrored room. You do not have the words to describe the experience and Esher’s work, like Yayoi Kusama’s work, is an experience somehow ineffable.
i am 71 retired in mexico. there is a small town Teotetlan de Valle outside Oaxaca City where generations have woven wool rugs and wall hangings for many generations. traditional scenes of birds and other natural wonders have given way to works inspired by modern artists. Picasso, Gaugan, and Escher are three i have acquired. When I asked a local why they would choose these depictions of european works, she replied ” they want to eat”. ah yes to eat, to chew . . . .
Very enjoyable documentary. Escher has always been a favorite of mine. I have several prints that hang around my house. Several years ago I needed to see a psyciatrist prior to having back surgery and he asked who my favorite artist was. After hearing me say Escher he produced a large signed print (No. 24/50) of Convex & Concave. As I was leaving he told me to take the print as it was given to him by a patient and he had nowhere hang it. I was overjoyed. I trust that it’s of some value although I haven’t found out what. I’m happy enough to just look at it.
Beyond well done! The emotional ambulations left me exhausted and yet heightened by the exercise. Musically emoting all the feelings; the artwork and landscapes phasing in and through the choreography of a man’s life, with historical gasps for breath inciting so piqued an interest, i was broadly depressed when it ended. There had to more more!
Such an incredible talented artist as well as an artist that can create art that inspires myself and countless others. His works stand alone. At times when I need to practice mindfulness and I need to relax I focus on the complexities of his artistic talents and I am in my own way spiritually re-charged.Share this it is too precious not to.
I became aware of the genius of Escher when I was quite young. I was mesmerized by the complex transitions and the, almost impossible, drawings of everyday objects and scenarios. As I grew older, I refined my art skills, using an Escher inspired theory of anything is possible if you are willing to create with an open mind.
This is one of the best documentaries about an artist I’ve ever seen. The landscapes and imagery chosen are frame by frame masterpieces in their own right, complimenting Etcher’s work in a way that I’m almost certain would have made him very happy. I’m sad every time I see fractals because he wasn’t around to experiment with that, probably he would have enjoyed those a lot as well.
It is, indeed, our great fortune that MC Escher had a well to do, supportive father, that he had a wonderful, inspiring art teacher who encouraged him to pursue graphic art, that he chose to visit the Alhambra Palace and to become smitten by the beautiful, intricate, repetitive, tesselated tiling mosaics contained therein, that his artistic endeavors were evidently more important to him than his marriage, and that he had a workaholic devotion to his ever mushrooming, innate talent and genius!
He died when i was 11 and he was world famous, at least in the Netherlands, for all i knew. I was impressed with his work and i think it influenced me. He’s the only artist i ever bought a book from, round 1980, with reproductions. I never really knew much about him, till now that i just saw the article. I would have liked him for sure. His work still intrigues me. Its on the virge of life and death, light and dark, order and chaos, logic and madness. Beauty and repetition… I think everyone can feel that what he did was important, even though maybe we cant say how or why.
Escher turned out to be a very talented artist and I think I would have liked him as a person, but on this occasion I would like to point out how the producers of this documentary have found so many points where M. C. Escher himself would have stood to look at the Italian sceneries. Good subject and very well covered.
Excellent documentary. One of my favorite artists. I’ve always been completely taken with his work, and its complexity since I first discovered him, I believe in my teenage years, I believe the first prince I ever remember seeing was of him, holding up the orb. there’s something very profound, complex and insightful in that image that you cannot escape. And it always stays with you. A fascinating artist. And I enjoyed learning about his life as well.
So profound his statement that ‘a man will never be able to express an idea as intensely as he feels it’. I think of literature, art, screen-writing, poetry, or music, especially music. Why this had not before occured to me I can’t imagine. But for me, it must go both ways. Because no doubt when composing a lament for example, surely the music can never commun- icate every corner of my soul or heart, but at the same time, there are emotional storms certainly that can only be said with music. Music can say so much more than any language or any number of words will ever manage.
To me as Dutch is the voice of Escher to outmost interest, because his Dutch is outstandingly good. Notice the subtitles. This is our standard in subtitles I remember from Dutch public television. English was always translated and represented in exactly the same style. Isn’t it very well readable? It is a reason why many Dutch have English as second language, this style subtitles!
Desperately sad ~ the selfish, self-centredness his art did to him to cause him to neglect his wife Jetta. Looking at the incredible genius and beauty of his art we mustn’t ignore when we gaze on it and lose ourselves in our gazing on marvellous contrived drawings and engravings that his convoluted, intricately created mathematical prints hide within them the sadness, the loneliness, the neglecting of his poor wife Jetta which has to see sorrow, besides much else, reaching tearfully three-dimensionally out of so many of his two-dimensional masterpieces.
It seems that a lot of the more famous artist come from wealthy families, or marry into wealth. One can only wonder how many truly great artists have lived, died, walked, worked, and dreamed right next to us. The only thing stopping people from realizing their genius being the lack of financial support, stopping them them from pursuing their true talents. Without an abundance of money, one must toil in labor in order to merely survive, while the wealthy few live off of the labor of the many. That is one of life’s, many, truly disgusting realities unfortunately. To be clear, M. Escher is amongst my favorites, and I hold no ill feelings toward the wealthy, it’s merely by chance what class one is born into. Barring the very few, highly motivated (or exceedingly lucky) people that manage to propel themselves out of the lower classes.
The final cinematographic element is a summit of summation. Film making found its high point, a kind of end of the circle that Escher decried. A guesstimate of the hours of preparation, and perfect templating of the final Zoom out and PAN across to the Amalfi coast line is hard to make. Could Escher’s own work stolen the image from a photograph? Otherwise how could he have sketched such precision so as to allow a film maker to superimpose with such precision? The final “scene” is elegantly conceived. It brings the viewers to their feet as an example top narrative combined with precise cinema that maximally exploits the artists life work. Secondly, the undertow created by Jetta’s complaining of “It’s all black and white!” is visually soothed by the Amazing film footage of Escher working. We witness the artists himself peel back the print and voila’, like Christmas morning presents, beautiful colors warm us. And aren’t those final works his best?? This documentary is everything an Art Historical project can achieve as it teaches and is it’s own example of great cinema too. Brava!
Love his work & as a horror buff i see mch the same frame of mind HP Lovecraft had & as true geniuses of their crafts they will stay immortal as there so many folks that don’t even know who they were which is sad . They were brilliant artists & writers of days gone by & what Esher said has become our reality in this messed up world .
i love escher, have many (most) of his prints in reproductions and i’m 80% done building my retirement home in the philippines inspired by him and frank lloyd wright out of concrete. i’ve never built a house before but spent years doing it in my imagination while driving my 18 wheeler over the road as a truck driver. i kind of overdid it strength wise as far as rebar and concrete composition, but not being a structural engineer i wanted to ‘cover my butt’ in this regard 😃🤣i plan to laminate and frame all my escher works and hang them throughout my home to enjoy as i grow older.
It shows you what can be achieved by a genuinely gifted person who never had to commercialise his work, money was not an issue. H. Bosch was just as idiosyncratic, he also had no money worries either. It dies make a difference when you are free to experiment and follow your own durection wherever it might kead you, with your work
Glad i didn’t become an artist/graphysist. Kant compete w such captivity, ended up instead as an Engineer, more interested in Mathematics. I thought about this article a little bit which i dink here in this audience havent noticed though profoundly emphasized in this article. He was exponentially transformed after moving from the Netherlands (low land) to Italy. As u kan imagine, basically, the former is flat, featureless land, only 2 dimensional w occassional ornament of windmills n sparce featureless residential bldgs here n there. On the other hand, Italy w hi hills, deep valleys, dense tall residential old bldngs w narrow alleys (they kant afford big wide blvds) is 3D. And, those Lines on Lines matching in direction … Though he was born privileged, he was strong nuf to accept n even appreciate poverty. Despite his harsh dark/white light contrasted works he’d created from this and his reflective curved space, he had a kind soul for creatures as well as us humankind. I did missed one of his black n white drawing which simultaneously forcing u to look from a building upward n downward in this presentation. Bravo for ur excellent presentation to match!
Ugh, he sounds like a vapid narcissist, admitting…without apology…that he kept his roommates up until 2 AM playing his dusty cello because he was sad about his unrequited love. If that isn’t an empathy-deficient, entitled statement pulled right out of the head of a narcissist, I don’t know what is.
Je suis à la recherche de la famille de l’auteur pour luis remettre ces oeuvres ou un musée de 50 ans d’âges, bien sur selon certaine condition bien entendue. I am looking for the author’s family to hand over these works or, a museum of 50 years of age, of course according to certain conditions of course. Busco la família de l’autor per lliurar aquestes obres o un museu de 50 anys, és clar, segons certes condicions, és clar. Sto cercando la famiglia dell’autore per consegnare queste opere o un museo di 50 anni di età, ovviamente secondo determinate condizioni, naturalmente. Es gibt einen Fehler in diesem Bericht, wenn gesagt wird, dass er einige Drucke dieser Umgebung gemalt und geschaffen hat Weil ich in meinem Besitz 2 Werke derselben Umgebung habe, ein Öl und einen Druck