The theory of migration and remittances suggests that there is an informal, internal financial market among migrant and nonmigrant family members, with the main purpose being to finance investments in human capital of young family members. The idea of an implicit and informal loan agreement between family members to explain migrants’ remittances is not new, but its implications have not been fully explored in the theoretical literature.
This study analyzes data on migrants’ remittances using a two-period theory of intergenerational transfers based on an informal, intrafamilial loan arrangement using “weak altruism”. The study also finds that emigration has left deep social-economic impacts on life standards of families left behind in Gujrat. Furthermore, the study discovered that emigration and remittances have a negative impact on the economic growth in Ghana.
In the loan repayment theory, the family invests in the education of the emigrant and usually finances the costs of migrating (travel and subsistence costs in the host country). This theory yields many interesting policy prescriptions for less developed countries wishing to maximize the remittance flow from emigrants.
The study also discusses the impact of emigration on the economy of less developed countries, such as Ghana, where most of the receiving families are poor and face high living costs. The theory also highlights the importance of addressing the economic challenges faced by emigrants and their families in order to maximize their remittance flow.
Article | Description | Site |
---|---|---|
(PDF) A Theory of Remittances as an Implicit Family Loan … | The idea of an implicit and informal loan agreement between family members to explain migrants’ remittances is not new, but its implications … | researchgate.net |
A theory of remittances as an implicit family loan arrangement | by B Poirine · 1997 · Cited by 648 — Poirine, Bernard, 1997. “A theory of remittances as an implicit family loan arrangement,” World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25, pages 589-611, January. | ideas.repec.org |
A theory of remittances as an implicit family loan arrangement | by B Poirine · 1997 · Cited by 648 — By Bernard Poirine; A theory of remittances as an implicit family loan arrangement. | econpapers.repec.org |
📹 New Theoretical Perspectives on the Distribution of Income and Wealth Among Individuals
Presented by Joseph Stiglitz, Paul Krugman, Duncan Foley, and Branko Milanovic at Columbia Law School. Inequality has …
How Do Remittances Help Families Living In Developing Countries?
Remittances, the funds sent by migrant workers to their families in their home countries, play a crucial role in global economies, especially in developing nations. They provide essential financial support for basic consumption, housing, education, and healthcare in poorer households, while enabling entrepreneurship and small business growth in wealthier households. In fact, remittances amounting to nearly $800 billion in 2022 are pivotal for reducing extreme poverty and improving health and nutritional outcomes.
They stabilize spending during crises and function as a form of 'social insurance'. Approximately 75% of remittances are allocated for necessities like food, medical expenses, and schooling. Policymakers must enhance cross-border migration systems, as financial isolation and stringent currency controls hinder remittance flows, leading to greater hardships for recipient families. Studies show that remittances have a substantial effect on poverty reduction, boosting household spending on health and education, and promoting economic growth through increased consumption.
As one in nine people globally depend on these transfers, the significance of remittances has never been more pronounced, particularly in light of the challenges posed by the pandemic. Overall, remittances emerge as vital financial lifelines, fostering improved living conditions and reducing inequality in many communities worldwide.
What Is An Example Of A Remittance?
A remittance transfer refers to an electronic money transfer from the United States to another country facilitated by a remittance transfer provider. Commonly referred to as "international wires" or "international money transfers," remittances play a crucial role in the global economy. Therefore, they usually involve a foreign worker sending money to a relative or friend in their home country. The term encompasses multiple payment forms, including personal money transfers, business transactions, and payments made for bills. Essentially, remittances can be categorized into inward and outward types, depending on the sender's location relative to the recipient.
Typically, example scenarios include a migrant worker sending funds back home for financial support, or a business transferring money to a supplier, such as a grocery store paying a beverage company. While remittances may encompass various payment methods—like wire transfers, checks, ACH, and credit cards—the fundamental aim remains consistent: transferring funds internationally. The evolving landscape of remittances also highlights cheaper alternatives like Wise, which can provide more cost-effective solutions compared to traditional banking methods. Therefore, understanding the nuances of remittance transfers is essential, especially given their significance in sustaining economic support across borders.
What Is The Remittances Report For 2024?
Remittances are anticipated to see a slight increase, projected at $124 billion in 2024 and $129 billion in 2025. India leads as the top recipient, followed by Mexico ($66 billion), China ($50 billion), the Philippines ($39 billion), and Pakistan ($27 billion). Overall, remittances are expected to grow by 2. 3% in 2024 and 2. 8% in 2025, reaching a total of $690 billion by 2025. In contrast, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows, which have been declining since 2012, are not predicted to recover significantly.
Fintech solutions for remittances from the USA are projected to achieve a transaction value of $29. 92 billion in 2024, with 95% of U. S. remitters sending money home to support family and friends. The report also examines cost variations among remittance service providers, including banks, money transfer operators (MTOs), mobile operators, and post offices. Despite a slowdown in growth—anticipated to halve for India from 2023—developments in regulation, technology, and migration will reshape the remittance service landscape.
Additionally, the remittance market size is forecasted to rise from $737. 05 billion in 2023 to $785. 92 billion in 2024, indicating a compound annual growth rate of 6. 6%. Overall, remittances remain a vital economic resource for low- and middle-income countries, with varying growth rates across regions.
What Are The Pros And Cons Of Remittances?
Remittances have emerged as a vital income source for millions globally, offering benefits like increased financial inclusion and support for families. However, they also come with drawbacks, including high fees and fluctuating currency rates. The impact of remittances has sparked debate, as some studies suggest they promote dependency, reduce labor supply, and encourage conspicuous consumption, while others argue they may harm the export sector, exemplified by the Dutch disease.
Despite these downsides, the advantages of remittances are substantial. They enhance financial inclusion, especially for unbanked individuals, and improve the livelihoods of families left behind, contributing to economic growth in recipient countries. Around one billion people rely on remittances, with 200 million migrant workers sending money home annually. Various remittance methods, including wire transfers and peer-to-peer payment systems, complicate the selection process for senders.
While remittances can bolster local economies by enabling household consumption and small business support, they can also create dependency, reduce labor force participation, and contribute to environmental issues. During economic downturns, they serve as a stable source of income, safeguarding families from financial shocks. Furthermore, remittances constitute over 3% of GDP in more than 80 countries, highlighting their role as a socio-economic engine.
However, reliance on remittances may discourage fiscal discipline in governments, posing another potential risk. The overall socio-economic effects of remittances are complex, balancing numerous pros and cons.
What Are The Negative Effects Of Remittances?
Remittances can have both positive and negative effects on economic growth and household welfare. While they may improve the livelihoods of receiving families and act as a form of "social insurance" by providing a supplemental income, they can also reduce labor supply, foster dependency, and diminish workforce participation, ultimately inhibiting economic growth. Increased remittances can lead to a rise in the consumption of nontradable goods, which can elevate their prices, appreciate the real exchange rate, and diminish exports, weakening the competitiveness of the receiving economy in global markets.
Moreover, they can contribute to environmental degradation and facilitate certain criminal activities. Studies suggest remittances may have a marginal positive effect on growth at a macro level; however, they can exacerbate income inequality and lead to a culture of dependency. Policy recommendations include not taxing remittances directly to avoid discouraging remittance flows. When these funds are not regulated through formal financial systems, they can create significant informal economic activity, potentially contributing to unstable inflation and income volatility. Thus, while remittances offer financial support, their overall impact on economic dynamics is complex and often negative in the long-term, posing challenges that need to be addressed by policymakers.
What Is The Concept Of Remittance?
A remittance is typically a sum of money sent by one party to another, usually across borders. This financial transfer is most commonly made by foreign workers to their relatives in their home countries and constitutes a vital source of income for individuals in low-income and developing nations. While the term can encompass various types of financial transactions like payments for bills or invoices, it is primarily associated with personal money transfers from migrants.
Remittances, estimated at around $656 billion in 2023, play an essential role in reducing poverty by meeting specific needs of recipients, such as food and clothing. They can include cash or goods and are often transacted through electronic means or wire transfers. The concept of remittance also extends to encompass payments for goods or services.
In essence, remittances facilitate economic stability for many families and communities, with significant implications for both sender and recipient. They are not only crucial for the families supported but also contribute considerably to the global economy by ensuring regular financial flows between countries. Overall, remittances are a vital economic lifeline bridging the financial gap between migrant workers and their families.
Why Do Emigrants Pay Remittances?
Our hypothesis posits that remittances function as the repayment of an informal, implicit loan taken by emigrants in their youth, aimed at enhancing their educational prospects for improved productivity in the modern sector. Currently, approximately one in nine individuals worldwide relies on remittances, which have outstripped various foreign income sources, including tourism, oil exports, and manufacturing in Mexico. Recognized as significant for development linked to migration, financial remittance flows have steadily risen since the 1990s.
Researcher Jose Ivan Rodriguez-Sanchez investigates how remittances impact Mexico's economy, highlighting their integral role. These funds, transferred from migrant workers back home, are crucial for family sustenance and welfare, often addressing essential needs like food and healthcare. The migration of skilled workers may impose challenges on economic growth in the home country; however, remittances can mitigate adverse effects by supporting local economies.
Over $400 billion is sent annually by overseas workers, motivated by various factors, including altruism and kinship. Notably, remittances play a crucial role in alleviating poverty and enhancing living standards. As targeted by UN Sustainable Development Goals, reducing remittance fees to under 3% by 2030 is a vital objective, promoting continued economic support through these financial channels.
What Is Loan Remittance?
A remittance is a payment sent from one party to another, often across borders, and commonly refers to money transferred from individuals working abroad to their families at home. The term stems from "remit," meaning to send. In the context of mortgages, it refers to servicers collecting borrower payments and forwarding them to investors. Lenders, when committing to sell whole loans to Fannie Mae, must select a remittance type that defines both the amount and timing for sending these payments.
Remittances can be categorized as either personal transfers between individuals in different countries or payments addressing loans or invoices. For loans, a remittance involves repaying the principal and interest, while in merchant cash advances (MCAs), it consists of transferring a percentage of future sales. Overall, remittances play a vital role in supporting families, alleviating poverty, and financing needs in the recipients' home countries, particularly for lower-income families.
They also encompass bank transfers for gifts or payments and electronic transfers by remittance providers. By facilitating various forms of payments, remittances support local economies, enable imports, and help in servicing external debts; in some nations, they are leveraged as collateral for overseas financing. Essentially, remittances reflect a significant financial connection between migrants and their families.
What Is The Theory Of Migration And Remittances?
The theory of migration and remittances posits an informal internal financial market among migrant and non-migrant family members, primarily to finance investments in young family members' human capital. Migrant remittances, defined as money and goods sent home by migrant workers, amounted to over US$ 400 billion in remittance flows to developing countries through formal channels in 2013. This article critiques remittance studies in social sciences, advocating for contemporary micro-level approaches linking geography, local history, and household lifecycle.
Remittances, which strengthen connections between migrants and their homelands, also create cross-border relations and shape transnational social networks, positively affecting origin countries' long-term economic performance.
Renewed optimism regarding transnational migrants and diasporas comes after decades of concerns about brain drain. The article elaborates on migration as part of risk-spreading strategies, emphasizing remittances as a cooperative arrangement within migrant families. Various models of migration share similar predictions about remittance motives, complicating empirical testing without robust data. Overall, remittances act as income transfers, alleviating market constraints for households in developing countries.
The New Economics of Labor Migration (NELM) theory suggests that remittances reduce production limitations and provide additional capital for communities, enhancing economic resilience and development.
What Is An Informal Loan Remittance?
The informal market's primary goal is to finance investments in the human capital of young family members. Informal loans and their repayments manifest as remittances between family members across different regions or countries. Such remittances can also be settled via goods trade. The costs associated with remittance transactions include a fee from the sending agent, typically borne by the sender, along with currency-conversion fees for local currency delivery.
Understanding the channels and volumes of informal remittance flows is crucial for policymakers. While efforts exist to formalize remittance flows, central banks should enhance their tracking methods, as unrecorded informal flows are estimated to exceed recorded flows by at least 50%. Informal remittance channels often involve friends, travelers, or contractors, and typically operate outside licensed or registered systems, primarily in cash. In contrast, formal remittances are those sent through official banking channels.
Informal remittances, sometimes referred to as "alternative remittance systems" or "underground banking," encompass both cash and noncash items transported across borders. Enhanced tracking of these flows can yield important insights for central banks, influencing policies effectively. Overall, the informal remittance landscape highlights significant trends and implications for financial services and economic stability.
Why Are Remittances A 'Implicit Loan'?
In the context of South Pacific Islands, the "implicit loan" theory posits that remittances primarily serve as a repayment for informal loans made by emigrants, taken during their youth to secure better education and future employment in the modern sector. This theory explains that remittances are regularly sent and are influenced by lending interest rates in the emigrants' host countries, effectively supplementing the consumption or housing investments of non-migrant family members back home.
Remittances function as financial support to cover educational expenses, enabling young relatives to prepare for their own migration in the future. The study employs a two-period theory of intergenerational transfers based on informal family loan arrangements, positing remittances as both repayment for loans contracted by the migrant and as loans provided to younger kin for educational purposes. The concept of implicit family loans is explored further, making it evident that these financial flows within families might reflect stronger motives beyond mere altruism.
Poirine (1997) highlights the necessity of realizing the familial dynamics that govern remittance patterns, indicating that these financial exchanges can be part of implicit migration contracts. The results show that emigration has significant socio-economic impacts on left-behind families, underscoring the complex mechanism of remittances as strategic investments aimed at enhancing family prosperity and educational outcomes.
📹 Citizen Hariri: Lebanon’s Neoliberal Reconstruction — Hannes Baumann
‘Citizen Hariri: Lebanon’s Neoliberal Reconstruction’ (Hurst, 2017) assesses not only the personal legacy of the man dubbed ‘Mr …
Problem of inequality is an obvious false dilemma. It is not important in any sense that someone has billions of dollars (one can think about them as personalized depositories of money). Yes, they are not stressed about the immediate future like the rest of us, but that is where distinction mostly ends. The real problem of modern times is state of affairs that leaves one third of population out of workforce, and lower income part of employed in the precarious state. This outsized part of the population views secure position of well off as increasingly enviable and yet factually unobtainable. Fair to say is that this state of affairs was normal for the most time in the industrial society. There are two key differences – members of the new precarious class came from the “middle” class background instead of peasantry or paupers; and recent past or 1940ththrough 1960th suggest opposite state of things. Explanation why in recent past things were so much better is not complicated, also will take little more than 12 minutes to explain the anomaly. What needs to be done is probably not monetary redistribution, but painstaking creation of sustainable economic structure for the people who are for various reasons not making much money. If you are poor you should not: 1)work in abusive work environment that is the threat to your sanity or general health 2)meet increased hardship in obtaining work when you looking for one 3)live in substandard, dangerous of excessively worn housing 4)live in the neighborhoods drowning in the (unreported) quality of life crime 5)have no power to curb inconsiderate behavior of other people in the neighborhood, as well as government structures including law enforcement 6)face extreme poverty in the old age 7)be obligated to send your kids in the unsafe, substandard or underfunded schools 8)pay disproportionate share of taxes 9)have your services curtailed because of society failure to fund them 10)being unable to attend college because if you graduated from one you would compete with the children of more well off people All what being poor is supposed to be is inability to buy new or nice things.
it seems the correlation between parents and children’s social class – including income, education, membership in the royal academies, and a high status profession – is about 0.73. Mårten Palme has written a paper on data from four generations in Sweden, from the parents of people born about 100 years ago to the people getting their educations now. Please note that Sweden has implemented a number of policies to increase social mobility, and yet the data do not show any effect of all those policies on social mobility. There are, of course, excellent effects in public health, education levels, quality of life in many dimensions, but social mobility… not so much. Gregory Clark has collected data based on surnames in several countries over almost the last 1000 years. UK, Sweden, even China ( who slaughtered much of their elite)… same results. Something like 0.73 correlation between parents and children. That level of coloration means that it takes about 10-15 generations for a high status person’s descendants to regress to the mean, or for a low status person’s descendents to regress to the mean ( climb the ladder). In every generation, there are about 20% of newcomers in the elite. Theirs are the stories we like to talk about and celebrate. Unfortunately, they are anecdotes.