In family court, proving someone is lying can be challenging but possible. One effective way to do this is by confronting them with previous sworn testimony that directly contradicts their current statements under oath. This can significantly damage their credibility. Documenting inconsistencies in their statements and carefully reviewing any written statements can help catch the other side in a lie and bring them to justice.
Fighting a lie is like shadow boxing, as it often comes down to “he said, she said”. The best way to get rid of the shadow is to turn on all the lights and face them. Attorney Brian Thomas Mayer explains the legal options when someone lies (commits perjury) in a family law case and discusses how the law could be applied.
Spotting a liar is not easy but is far from impossible. Reviewing documentation can provide valuable information. Individuals who believe someone is lying may choose to discuss this issue with a lawyer. They can explain the options available and what can be done to remedy the situation. Cross-examination can be used to poke holes in the witness’s account if they believe they were lying.
The extent of lying in family court can range from lies about income, assets, and complete fabrications of child abuse and domestic violence. The best way to defeat a liar is to have lots of proof to contradict them. Bring all your proof to court and don’t assume that the judge has read it.
Confronting someone with previous sworn testimony that directly contradicts their current statements can be an effective way to prove someone is lying in court. Consult with a local family law attorney as lying under oath or perjury is serious and can damage the lying party’s credibility with the court.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Easy Ways to Prove Someone Is Lying in Family Court | Ask the witness leading questions about the thing they lied about. Leading questions are considered the hallmark of cross-examination. By leading the witness … | wikihow.com |
| Lying In Family Court | The extent of lying in Family Court: lies about income, assets and even complete fabrications of child abuse and domestic violence. | highconflictinstitute.com |
| How to defeat an extreme liar in family court? – Divorce | The best way to defeat a liar is to have lots of proof to contradict her. Bring all your proof to court. Don’t assume that the judge has read it … | reddit.com |
📹 The Liar in Court Proceedings
This episode looks briefly at how the ‘Liar’ (as defined by Pat Craven in her book Living with the Dominator) comes across in court …
How To Expose A Liar?
To effectively catch a liar, first gather direct evidence that contradicts their statements, such as documents or videos. Non-verbal cues, including body language and tone, are also crucial indicators of dishonesty. When presenting evidence, maintain a calm demeanor and articulate your findings clearly. Haugen discusses a type of deceit where individuals lie to protect their interests, often compounding falsehoods when exposed, which increases their risk of getting caught.
Craft questions with an assumption of guilt and remember that distractions can reveal inconsistencies, as liars struggle to fabricate a narrative under pressure. Maintaining composure is key to identifying deceit, despite the temptation to react hastily. It’s essential to observe details carefully and recognize signs of evasion or deception, which may indicate wrongdoing. Common beliefs about liars avoiding eye contact are challenged, as studies show they often maintain gaze.
Psychological research highlights micro-expressions and speech patterns as valuable clues in lie detection. To expose a liar, allow them to speak freely, noting any contradicting information. Additionally, unexpected questions can uncover discrepancies, while assessing whether their actions align with their words serves as a reliable method for discerning truthfulness amidst skilled liars.
How Do Liars React When Accused?
When someone is lying or concealing something, they may exhibit signs such as fidgeting, sweating, turning pale, or speaking with a higher pitch. Their eye contact might vary, shifting between avoiding it and making more intense, prolonged engagement. Liars typically respond to accusations with either denial or aggression, often insisting on their truthfulness and disputing their accusers. Defensiveness can escalate to anger if they feel unjustly accused, and some may resort to further dishonesty to counter the allegations.
Studies show that anger may actually indicate innocence, as falsely accused individuals frequently react with indignation, reflecting a sense of unfairness about the accusations. The emotional response can mislead observers, leading them to misinterpret anger as a sign of guilt. Research from Harvard Business School and the University of Toronto highlights that being accused falsely can be as distressing as physical harm.
Liars may also display particular linguistic patterns, such as using fewer contractions and personal pronouns when denying allegations. Common responses include disbelief, denial, and frustration, alongside attempts to demonstrate their innocence. Accusations of deception can harm relationships, especially when the accused is innocent. Overall, while anger is a natural reaction to false accusations, it should not be misconstrued as an indication of guilt. Recognizing these dynamics is crucial for understanding how accusations affect both the accused and their relationships.
How Do You Call Someone Out For Lying?
When someone lies, it’s important to address the situation thoughtfully. Use "I" statements to express how their dishonesty affects you, avoiding direct blame. For instance, say, "I noticed you said [specific statement], but I have evidence suggesting otherwise." It's often best to approach the liar later, after you’ve confirmed the lie. This gives you the opportunity to remain calm and collected. Take a non-confrontational approach by framing your questions from an angle that implies guilt, asking neutral, non-threatening questions to gauge their response.
If you decide to confront them, do so in person and privately to maintain a respectful environment. Gaslighting may complicate matters as it involves manipulation of reality, so be alert to such tactics. Effective confrontation involves mentioning how you uncovered the lie and inviting them to explain their side. Avoid calling them out publicly to minimize defensiveness. If you sense something is off, lead with goodwill and inquire genuinely about their perspective.
Rather than getting emotional, keep the conversation straightforward. If escalation seems necessary, take a pause to collect your thoughts. Use phrases like "something feels off" to express your discomfort without outright accusations. The key is to address the specific lies without labeling them as a liar, fostering an open dialogue about the impact of their dishonesty.
How Do I Prove My Ex Is Lying In Court?
To demonstrate that your ex is lying under oath and secured a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) through false claims, gather evidence that contradicts their allegations. Such evidence can include text messages, emails, or other communications reflecting their abusive behavior towards you. In high-conflict child custody cases, collaborating with an experienced family law attorney is crucial. They can assist in determining the best course of action, such as appealing decisions or filing a motion for judicial review.
Discovery mechanisms are essential to uncover lies; request bank records, tax documents, and other pertinent information. Although some tactics may delay resolution, it’s vital to remain focused on your case.
To prove someone is lying in court, provide contradicting testimony and concrete evidence such as witness statements, photographs, and recorded communications. Detailed records of interactions with your ex can serve as protection against false accusations. If you believe your ex has committed perjury, you must present factual evidence showing their statements were intentionally false and malicious.
Direct contradictions in their testimony can be highlighted, and you may ask the judge to hold your ex and their attorney accountable. Focus on factual evidence backed by credible sources to strengthen your case while maintaining composure during proceedings.
Do People Get Away With Lying In Court?
Lying in court, or perjury, is a serious offense that can lead to criminal charges, resulting in fines, probation, or imprisonment based on jurisdiction and crime severity. Although individuals in court are sworn to tell "the whole truth and nothing but the truth," many manage to provide false testimonies without facing repercussions. This phenomenon is often dubbed "the forgotten offense" due to its prevalence and low prosecution rates, particularly in the U.
S., where perjury laws have existed since 1790. While lying in court undermines the integrity of the judicial process, proving perjury can be challenging, with only a small fraction of perjured testimonies leading to charges. Witnesses who lie can have their credibility irreparably damaged if their statements conflict with prior testimony. Judges often hold the authority to address perjury directly within their courtrooms. The notion that individuals can lie without consequence raises concerns about the judicial system's reliance on truthful testimony.
Although there are strict rules governing honesty in legal proceedings, the reality is that many who deceive in court might escape prosecution. The penalties for lying in court are significant, yet the mechanisms for enforcement remain inadequate, leading to frustrations regarding the integrity of the legal system and the pursuit of justice.
How Do You Prove Someone Is Lying In Family Court?
In family court, proving someone is lying often necessitates a strategic approach, as concrete evidence may not always be available. The most effective method to demonstrate dishonesty is to present clear evidence that contradicts the individual's claims, such as emails, text messages, or financial records. Identifying inconsistencies in their statements can also be vital; carefully reviewing written documents or testimonies for contradictions or changes over time is recommended. Additionally, reliable witnesses can help support your case by providing their testimonies to challenge the false narrative.
To establish perjury, one must present factual evidence demonstrating that the statement in question was not only false but also made with malicious intent. If a person is proven to have lied under oath, they may face serious consequences, including contempt of court. Observing behavioral cues is common, but the emphasis should be on concrete documentation and witness statements.
In some situations, third parties may also inform the court about lies, reinforcing the case against the dishonest party. Ultimately, focus on accumulating evidence that aligns with your position and illustrates the opposing party's misrepresentation, ensuring that your child's best interests remain the priority. Good luck in navigating the complexities of family law!
Why Do People Lie In Family Court?
Family court proceedings are inherently stressful and emotional, often leading participants to lie under oath for various reasons, including securing favorable outcomes regarding alimony or child support. Many individuals may exaggerate or misrepresent facts, sometimes out of panic or a genuine belief in their narrative, while others do so with malicious intent. The prevalence of perjury in family court, often termed "the forgotten offense," goes largely unpunished, despite being a crime since 1790.
Proving dishonesty requires a strategic approach, whereby gathering documentary evidence—such as emails, text messages, or financial records—that contradicts false claims is crucial. Emotional custody battles can provoke serious accusations and lies, particularly concerning issues like domestic violence. Consequently, family courts must navigate these challenges carefully, considering the complexities behind each person’s motivations to lie. If a party is found lying, they risk severe consequences, including losing custody or facing criminal charges.
Ultimately, the integrity of family court relies on the assumption of honesty, making it essential to address and sanction dishonest behavior to maintain fairness in these critical legal matters. The family law system aims to resolve disputes honestly, yet the reality of widespread dishonesty complicates this goal.
How To Confront A Liar Without Proof?
When confronting someone you believe is lying, it's crucial to be direct and honest while allowing space for their explanation. Stay calm, even if tensions rise, and consider three key questions to decide whether to confront or overlook the lie. Research indicates that detecting deception is less about nonverbal cues and more about understanding that lying requires substantial effort. If past deceptions create emotional distance, it’s essential to reclaim your sense of self.
Look for inconsistencies in the person's statements, as confronting them directly may provoke defensiveness and backlash. Understand that your own minor fabrications can obscure your ability to detect serious deception. Reflect on your relationships—do they involve dishonest or bullying behaviors? If you feel someone close is lying, approach them carefully. Instead of outright accusations, ask clarifying questions to encourage openness. Observing behavioral cues like a tense voice or inconsistent stories can also offer clues.
Engaging in Socratic questioning may further reveal inconsistencies without escalating conflict. If the individual admits the lie, a frank discussion may suffice. Effective strategies for dealing with liars include staying composed, actively listening, gathering evidence, and addressing your concerns with goodwill. Ultimately, ensure you are confident and clear in your communication when addressing dishonesty.
How Do You Catch A Witness Lying On The Stand?
Catching a witness lying on the stand can be frustrating, but it can be effectively accomplished by presenting contradictory testimony. This strategy is applicable in various cases such as criminal, civil, commercial, family, or probate. Proving that a lie exists, especially regarding a disputed central fact, allows for discrediting the witness through continued questioning. When a witness testifies for the opposing side, cross-examination becomes an opportunity to challenge their credibility if you suspect dishonesty.
There are several methods to detect deception, starting with behavioral analysis, monitoring for cues like lack of eye contact when answering questions. Ethical and practical issues arise when attorneys deal with dishonest witnesses, but Rule 613 can be utilized when the witness's current testimony conflicts with prior statements. Witnesses testify under oath, risking criminal charges for lying, which poses a significant incentive to remain truthful.
Cross-examination aims to reinforce your case and expose weaknesses in the opposing testimony. Although outright lies are rare, proving deception can lead to perjury charges. Close attention should be paid to facial expressions, body language, and speech patterns to discern potential dishonesty in witness testimonies.
How To Prove In Court That Someone Is Lying?
To counter claims in court, it is essential to gather evidence that contradicts the opposing party's statements, which may include text messages, emails, social media posts, and other relevant documents. Ensure this evidence is preserved and presented in an organized manner. Witnesses testify under oath, making it crucial to demonstrate inconsistencies or contradictions in their statements. Proving perjury, which involves showing intentional lying under oath, can be challenging and often requires substantial evidence.
Common strategies to establish dishonesty include presenting testimony that disputes false claims and highlighting contradictory physical evidence or prior sworn statements. In family court, look for inconsistencies in written statements or declarations over time to strengthen your case. Observing changes in demeanor during testimonies can also provide clues. Utilizing deposition transcripts to confront witnesses about previous contradictory statements or presenting witness testimonies that accurately reflect the truth may help substantiate claims. Successfully proving perjury or dishonesty involves meticulous evidence collection, strategic courtroom presentation, and a profound understanding of legal processes.
Do Judges Know When Someone Is Lying?
Judges often rely on their ability to detect dishonesty during cross-examination, as people frequently lie without thoroughly considering their statements. This experience leads many judges to feel confident in identifying when someone is lying, with a survey revealing that over 90% of 371 responding judges expressed varying levels of confidence in their ability to discern lies. If a judge perceives a witness as dishonest, their credibility is severely undermined, potentially influencing the judge's rulings.
In family court, evidence that contradicts a witness's testimony can decisively expose lies, although such evidence is not always available. The judge's decision-making hinges on assessing the credibility and reliability of the evidence presented, which may include testimonies from both parties. When both parties present conflicting accounts, judges will consider external evidence not tainted by the questionable testimonies. Moreover, while judges may have instincts about deception, they lack formal training in detecting lies, nor is it their responsibility to report dishonesty.
Instead, it is the opposing party's duty to prove any lies presented. Observing non-verbal cues, such as aversion to eye contact, can also indicate deceit, yet judges may not have the psychological insights attributed to psychologists. Ultimately, judges must sift through testimonies and evidence to make informed decisions based on truthfulness and reliability, underscoring the balance of credibility in the courtroom.
How Do You Prove A Witness Is Lying?
In family court, messages from witnesses—like text messages, social media posts, and voicemails—are generally admissible. If a witness's statements in these messages contradict their testimony in court, this evidence can be utilized to demonstrate their dishonesty. To identify a lying witness, one can present contradicting testimony or highlight inconsistencies in their statements. Gathering corroborating evidence or physical proof further strengthens the case against the witness.
During cross-examination, attorneys aim to undermine a witness's credibility by illustrating unreliability or misstatements. It's essential to observe a witness's behavior; liars often struggle with maintaining eye contact. Cross-examination serves as a vital tool to expose discrepancies in a witness's account. Depositions, though rare in family court, are also used to uncover false testimony. To prove a witness is lying, presenting clear evidence, such as surveillance footage or expert testimonies, that conflicts with their claims is crucial.
The process for addressing perjury charges revolves around the critical nature of maintaining truth in court. A comprehensive approach focusing on identifying inconsistencies and bolstering your case provides the strongest method for addressing potential dishonesty from witnesses.
📹 How to unmask your accuser as a liar (and win your case in court without a lawyer)
WARNING: Nothing in this video is legal advice whatsoever. Self-representation is almost always a bad idea. Criminal defense …
Everything you said in your first 10 minutes hits very hard for me. Because it is what my ex wife has been acusing me of falsely for the last 6 years. She has accused me of SA all of my children and she has taken away all my communication. The only recourse I have is to take her to court and fight the system of abuse the state allows. I can’t afford a place of my own, my credit is destroyed and I miss my children very much. She promised me when my first son was an infant that if I ever thought about leaving her or speaking out against her she would take my son away. After not speaking to my mom for almost 9 years I restarted my relationship with her because I was depressed and Isolated from everyone I used to love. We were divorced shortly after I made a stand and refused to end my relationship with my mom for her and my children. And when I made the decision to leave her I thought I was doing the smart thing, we have no order of custody. All I can share with you is the shadow they have left and nothing makes her happier.
in my case, i had won a child arrangements order, then 3 months later my ex refused return of child, lied for 2.5 years, still on going, refusng contact to me, the mother, and causing me to have alsorts of assesments mental helth drugs anything, but there is light at the end of the tunnel, third court case and scotts statements going thru, lies will be found out but what then, will i finally have my son bk
great articles and info for everyone involved in family court proceedings,ive just binge watched the articles on the website, and found them very informative on most aspects were people would be confused or even worried about. im a none abusive male who has had numerous encounters within the family courts since 2009 i’ve secured residency of my son on 2 separate occasions since 2009 to date with over 5 years of litigation experience, the more recent court appearances included a guardian ad litem and solicitor, representing the child. i think it would be good useful knowledge and a informative article if you was able to give your views on guardians being requested in family court proceedings, and their role. specifically when there has been serious allegations made between parties. i recently filed for another c.o.a live with for my daughter where all contact had been stopped and will have the same guardian representing my daughter who represented my son, from different mothers. pd12j was automatically followed from the first hearing due to the allegations raised by both myself and the mother even though it was my application to the court c100 with a c1a the guardian has only just been appointed so the next hearing will be the first with a independent cafcass worker making recommendations to the court.
Yes my ex went to court for access and denied the abuse saying I wanted money when he threatened to stop the money if I stopped contact. Clearly drunk when he put together his statement as got his sons birthday wrong, and everything he claimed had evidence to prove otherwise. Didnt think he would have his record looked into and his charge sheet as long as his arm dissected. Narcissists dont change
I’m dealing with an ex who was abusive. I left her dad and like he always threatened he kept our 5 year old daughter (My first born) He said no one would let me keep her so don’t try it with him. Also it was his name on the house although I paid thousands when I lived with him. I’ve luckily found my knight in shining armour now and we have a 4 months old girl together .The issue with my ex though is that he’s not someone to upset or even try court with. He’s a very good liar and can scream and swear at me and our daughter but then get out of the car and just change to being sweet (very frightening)if people asked why I was upset he’d say oh you know what she’s like then I’d have to wait until we got home. He said he would get the best lawyer if I tried so I wait…btw although I have my baby I think of my daughter every day and I miss her all the time
I so needed to hear this! I did a Claire’s law after my 3rd & last beating.. The report was horrendous I can’t disclose much bt 30yr history DV in that time spent 12yrs in prison IPP I had no idea.. My point is.. he knows the system & is used to courts etc..im not 😢 I’ve no police record or ever been in a crown court, I haven’t the experience. I feel like I’m going to be fed to the wolves.. Id gratefully appreciate any advice.. ❤
Thank you so much for these articles. I’m really grateful that you raised the SRA upholding the law when you as an officer of the court is aware that your client is lying and not being able to represent them in the future. This helps me greatly. If you do read my comment, could I ask if it’s just you that can’t work with the disclosing client or is it the firm? Many thanks Mel
my ex’s solicitor contiues to represent ex in court even though they have repeatedly submitted, condradicting and misleading statements on behalf their client ‘whilst under oath’ to judges. Who’s duty is it to report them, how do we go about it? It is because of unethical solicitors/barristers and the mere fact that they cheat the system gives them a huge advantage in these cases. in my case a prolonged sepeartion between father and child… 3 years and counting, many factors, some of it solicitors some of it the family courts themselves with their admin errors/ judge shortages.
For various reasons, I threw my kids’ dad out when they were very young. He managed to get a (local authority) flat just a few minutes’ drive away but only visited them when it suited him, often making arrangements but not turning up as promised, so I stopped his access and forced him to go and see a solicitor. I subsequently received a letter from that solicitor in which he stated “I am disappointed to learn my client has not been able to see his children for three months.” I replied, typing 6 sides of A4, giving a background to the whole situation and explained that at the time of writing, it had only been 5 weeks since I’d thrown him out. In other words, the father had been living with us for 2 of those 3 months so had lied to the solicitor. I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall when next the father visited the solicitor to discuss this.
This is brilliant information. Keep factual. Change terns to abusing and non abusing snd stop these trolls taking the gender issue. Keep going, this is what the public need and more importantly the children whom youre assisting by family court assistance. Please tell me how I can contact you directly for advice / representation
Last year I left my ex partner and took our daughter with me because her mom kept going out drinking and then coming home and being aggressive…after I left I applied to the family court for custody of our daughter I still wanted my daughter to see her mom but I wanted custody until her mom sorted herself out…before we went to court though she got our daughter back by getting me arrested by lying and saying that I’d hit her 3 weeks before I left her…she lied loads to the court saying I’d hit her etc we did one hearing and then she went behind the courts back and started letting me have our daughter…I stopped going to the court hearings in the end because my daughter’s mom had stopped drinking so I was happy withy daughter being with her…she was granted custody…I’ve been having my daughter every weekend from Friday until Sunday…6 weeks ago me and my ex partner had a arguement and now she’s stopped me seeing my daughter again because she’s using her as a weapon her excuse is I’ve hit my daughter…I’ve had to take her to court again my court date isn’t until another 4 weeks though…this time around I recorded some of our phone calls were she’s threatening me and also recorded other people threatening me on her behalf I’ve contacted the police there investigating it all…I’m worried about court because in my experience from last year if you mention anything that makes the court question if you’ve done anything to a child you don’t get to see your child…last year they wouldn’t even let me see my daughter in a contact centre.
I don’t understand why she needs to be so sexist. This also happens in same sex relationships. – Not all family lawyers/barristers are not the same and do not refuse to represent a person because they lie. We are all people and not everyone acts the same. Also fact-finding on family court is based on a criminal standard. And Judges will often err on the side of caution and say they “prefer someones evidence”.
What is considered abusive for children? Is brainwashing your children abusive? Is paying your child to stsy in the home, so they will hide mail from one parent, or steal off that parent, or hide the fact that the person not in the home, has been living a secret life for ten years, is that abusive? Haven’t spoken to my boys in five years, but the thing is, he waited until they were almost adults to do it.
Do the SRA endorse solicitors behaviour in misleading court by tainting court bundles, making deliberate omissions in order to get favourable outcomes for their client knowing full well of their conduct and actions? Secondly, false allegations of DA/DV in application to get legal aid. Is this seen as misleading the court?
Sounds like lass I’m in with. I’m 3rd 1 shes taken through this not seen daughter in 15months. She told me one of the dads tried getting his daughter to touch him. Next minute I’m the one getting punched. And my baby daughter as I was holding her. This happened 3 times. Then she told me the other daughters dads non mol was finished and she was telling him he could by pictures of the daughter hes touched up. Got intouch with him didn’t I. She got him in trouble with police and obviously stopped him seeing baby.
Now I see why things is the way it is in uk she never even one good point on a man behalf everything was calling the man a liar and going in every way they can find to get him sad I’m going through this right now for the first time in my life and trying to make it seems like some killer and never been in court are had nothing like this in my life
You have an underlying presumption that the liar/abuser is the father. Men and women are the same animals, women are just as capable of being abusive liars. You paint a very lovely moral picture the reality is that the courts are known to be biased. I know a case where the court not only believed a lying mother but ignored and dismissed the actual Social Services evidence which clearly dismissed her allegations. Family lawyers are paid huge amounts and do you know any example of them being called to account.
I just want to say this to everyone including myself I’m sorry we all have to go through this I still can’t believe this myself that this person or people could do this to all of us I just want to say I have believed all the lies and accusations I still to this day believe maybe I am abusive maybe I am the narcissist all the things I was accused of I doubt myself regularly iv gone to therapy counseling men behaviour change program’s single parenting programs done dv programs the lot even though myself and the people I worked with said they don’t see any of those things in me many months ago I was out and about not a care in the world but all this has just made me turn into a hermit crab I only leave the house to get things I need because I’m scared this is going to happen again this has taken a very big part of me away
I am sorry, but I cannot watch this. Consider this: a father who has been at the other end of what you describe, with an ex-wife who is narcissistic and has abused the father both mentally and physically, has abused their son both mentally and physically, has also abused the benefit that a solicitor lends as an officer of the court, and similarly abused CAFCASS officers over the years, until one CAFCASS officer who understood narcissistic personality disorder. Your inability to express these ideas without giving examples that are only showing a man to be the abuser is encouraging the false understanding and false assumption that men are the only abuser. Furthermore, although you mention a male dominated society, I put it to you that, in family matters in court, the mother is advantaged greatly by a system that, like you, cannot, seemingly, frame an argument in which the female is the abuser, as you describe the abuser to be here. I would like to add here that as you explain so forcefully that a solicitor, as an officer of the court, may not legally continue a lie, no matter how that lie might help a case, you might seem to be telling prospective female clients to not tell you that they are lying or have lied in previous proceedings, as it is more than your job is worth to go along with a known lie. The mother of the child abused the legal system thus from when the son was 3 years old, until recently when he is 13 years old. The only thing that stopped her blatant lies was a female judge’s utterance that “if you want to pursue the idea that the father is the abuser then I will have to consider a custodial sentence, do you understand?
Hang on how about my case in begged my ex to see my child she didn’t answer unsuspecting she then filed harrasment charges against me and because I have a criminal record already not related to any violence by the way I was sent to jail when in addition they served me a three year restraining order altho I don’t understand that as I’ve never been in trouble for violence in her first statement to the police on the harrasment charge she has co firmed this saying I was controlling but not violent the three years pasted she immediately applied for a no molestion order and got it too but in this statement she says I was always violent to her I have both copies of the statements on the non molestation order it says I’m know to the national domestic abuse place but I’ve never even spoken to a socail worker or carcass I’ve had no contact from anyone ever so what do I do I have two statements that completely contradict each other I’ve never met my child we split up before she was born I know nothing at all about her not even her date of birth so what can I do to fight back against this lair
Good article but very one sided…. things are not that simple .i have been abusive in my relation for a period of 4 year mainly emotional abuse .but the allegation against was describing me like a serial killer, my partner turn 4 years of conflict into 2o years, and my partner was definitely manipulation my children against me. in the end the. NMO WAS FAR FOR DESTRUCTIVEE AND ABUSIVE, than my behaviour.