In Hidden Depths, Professor Penny Spikins delves into the evolution of human emotions and how they have shaped our ancestry. She argues that emotional intelligence is deeply rooted in our evolutionary history, with Darwin’s 1872 argument that the human emotion system has deep roots. Historians have documented the ever-changing terms associated with emotions, including passions, appetites, affects, and sentiments. As humans’ hominin ancestors sought to adapt to more open-country habitats without forest protection, natural selection began to enhance emotions by enlarging subcortical structures.
Emotional intelligence is based on the idea that people’s interactions with others are influenced by mental and emotional mechanisms. The “evolution of emotion” theory posits that emotions were vital for survival, and since Plato, many Western thinkers have viewed emotions as obstacles. However, by 130, 000 years ago, humans began interacting with social groups located far from their own, and by 130, 000 years ago, groups living 300 km (186 mi) away lived together.
Psychological research has demonstrated that humans are born with an innate ability to form close social and emotional attachments throughout life. Anthropologists believe that emotions such as compassion, love, empathy, and other complex emotions have deep roots in human evolution. The goal is to examine chains of behavioral events in which emotional expressions function to control and communicate with others.
Universality has been claimed, and both French and Scottish social and moral philosophers used evolutionary schemes during the 18th century. Montesquieu proposed universality, and the study of anthropology has reflected our evolving relationships with other people and cultures. The anatomy and chemistry that make feelings possible hasn’t changed in the last hundreds of thousands of years.
Psychological anthropology is an interdisciplinary subfield of anthropology that studies the interaction of cultural and mental processes. The evolution of human culture can be explained not by the size of our brains but by the quality of our relationships.
Article | Description | Site |
---|---|---|
EVOLUTION OF HUMAN EMOTION: A View Through Fear | by JE LeDoux · 2012 · Cited by 370 — By the mid 1980s, thirty years of research on the brain mechanisms of avoidance had been conducted. | pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov |
The Anthropology of Emotions | The goal is to examine chains of behavioral events in which emotional expressions function to control and communicate with others. Universality has been claimed … | researchgate.net |
The Evolution of Social Connection as a Basic Human Need | Humans have survived for thousands of years through our ability to connect, communicate, and cooperate with each other. Looking around today, … | thesocialcreatures.org |
📹 Human Origins 101 National Geographic
The story of human evolution began about 7 million years ago, when the lineages that lead to Homo sapiens and chimpanzees …
Why Did Humans Evolve To Have Emotions?
The evolutionary basis of emotions lies in their ability to link physical sensations with experiences and meanings critical for survival. Primitive creatures that lacked mental complexity relied on affective forms to extract essential information about their environment. The advent of language in humans significantly advanced emotional evolution, allowing for the articulation, sharing, and anticipation of emotional experiences.
Various emotions emerged at different evolutionary stages; primal emotions like love and fear are linked to ancient psychological structures, while social emotions such as guilt and pride arose among social primates.
The prevailing evolutionary perspective asserts that emotions have historically contributed to survival, enabling quick responses to threats, such as fleeing from danger driven by fear. Researchers have focused on specific emotion systems, like fear, rather than seeking a universal emotion framework, observing that emotions inform behavior related to survival and reproduction. Emotions represent sophisticated mechanisms that facilitate rapid mental and physical adaptation to environmental challenges.
This emotional capacity, rooted in early human development, functions as a vital communication tool, predating language. Understanding emotional evolution demands an exploration into how humans uniquely evolved emotional capabilities, which remain integral to our social interactions and overall welfare. Emotions, a remnant of our evolutionary journey, are primarily governed by primitive brain regions.
When Did Emotion Research Start?
The "golden years" of emotion research began with Darwin's 1872 work, The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, which established foundational ideas about emotions being mental states leading to stereotypical bodily expressions. This laid the groundwork for the "basic emotion" approach in psychology. The historical study of emotions investigates human emotions across cultures and time. Starting from the 20th century, scholars like Lucien Febvre and Peter Gay introduced diverse methodologies into the field. Historically, emotions have been treated as discoveries; however, they are, in fact, prescriptions rooted in existing frameworks. The late 19th century saw researchers explore the interplay of emotions and the brain, with neuroscientists focusing on this relationship. In the 1970s and 1980s, research on infant and child emotions began to thrive, further contributing to ongoing studies. Ruth Leys recounts post-World War II developments in emotion theory, specifically relating to Basic Emotions Theory. This examination traces over 20 theories since the 1960s, using William James's theory as a reference point. Overall, the study of emotions is enriched by cultural and social contexts as well as biological factors, marking a vibrant evolution in this realm of psychological inquiry.
Who Introduced Emotional Development?
This page provides an overview of the social and emotional developmental tasks of children and teenagers, continuing into adulthood, framed within Erik Erikson's Eight Stages of Development from 1956. It begins with a brief history of emotion research, contrasting emotional development with broader emotion literature. Notably, William James's 1884 essay questioned the essence of emotion, paving the way for initial theories of emotional development.
Erikson's model, influenced by Freud's psychosexual development theory, highlights concepts of self-development and attachment. Emotional development is characterized as an integrative process involving understanding emotions, self-awareness, and emotion regulation. Various theorists, including Lewis and Michaelson and Sroufe, have explored how emotions serve different needs and how they develop throughout childhood. Despite the absence of a universally accepted theory of emotional development guiding research, several theories are reviewed, investigating how emotions evolve with age.
Parents and caregivers play a crucial role in fostering social and emotional development in early childhood. Overall, the page emphasizes the complex transformations in emotional experiences from infancy to adolescence, underscoring the importance of understanding emotional development as a multifaceted psychological construct. This overview aligns with significant contributions in the field, reflecting on past and contemporary theories of emotional growth.
How Have Emotional Connections Shaped Human Ancestry?
In "Hidden Depths," Professor Penny Spikins examines the crucial role of emotional connections in shaping human ancestry. She highlights three pivotal transitions in human evolution, illustrating how the emotional capacities of early ancestors evolved in response to changing ecological conditions, mirroring developments observed in other social mammals. Emphasizing the importance of emotional attachment, Spikins suggests that such bonds significantly enhance survival rates for offspring, creating a lineage rooted in emotional depth.
The exploration of "Emotional Genealogy" reflects an understanding of our ancestors as tangible beings, fostering a connection that intertwines emotional experience with genetic heritage. By elucidating genetic similarity, especially among siblings, Spikins sheds light on the profound emotional ties within families. Ultimately, "Hidden Depths" posits that early humans developed a spectrum of emotions—sympathy, empathy, kindness—that not only shaped individual relationships but also transformed cognitive frameworks, enhancing the collective social fabric through compassion, trust, and inclusion. This foundational emotional evolution informed human dynamics and relationships, underlining the significance of emotional connections in our evolutionary journey.
What Is Anthropology Of Emotions?
The anthropological theory of emotion encompasses a multifaceted exploration of human behavior and culture, facilitated by ethnographic methodologies. This field within social sciences analyzes affect, feelings, and the dynamic interrelations of sociocultural contexts. Over the last two decades, anthropologists have investigated emotional dynamics across diverse cultures, developing varied theories. Andrew Beatty provides a critical review of significant works, examining the intersection of philosophical and psychological insights.
Emotion terminology reflects experiences integrating meaning with feeling, involving both mind and body, though conventional theories often simplify these complex interactions. Recent developments in emotion theory emphasize its social, relational, communicative, and cultural dimensions, increasing its relevance in human sciences. The anthropology of emotions, historically underexplored, confronts theoretical tensions like materialism and idealism.
Scholars advocate for new approaches to navigate the meaning-feeling dichotomy through historical reinterpretations and analytical methods. Pioneering ethnographic fieldwork suggests that understanding the intricate relationship between emotions and culture requires meticulous observation of behavior. A landmark collection of essays in this discipline signifies a turning point, affirming the necessity of emotional realism to grasp the diverse human experience. Emotions are recognized as culturally variable, necessitating cautious comparative analysis.
How Does Anthropology Relate To Mental Health?
Anthropologists have significantly contributed to the understanding of mental health and illness by highlighting the relational nature of people's experiences and the diverse social consequences associated with them across different cultures. Their work spans various intellectual traditions and debates, addressing the complexities of mental disorders, treatment, and recovery. Key determinants of mental health issues include poverty, gender inequality, social exclusion, and conflict. Additionally, anthropologists have explored discrimination linked to mental health and stigmatized disorders, advocating for a partnership with organizations combatting these issues.
In an environment often dominated by quantitative research, anthropological approaches prioritize the lived experiences of individuals, shedding light on the cultural contexts surrounding mental illness. By examining the intersections of culture and mental health, anthropology fosters dialogue between psychiatry and cultural perspectives. The push towards a new agenda for mental health emphasizes the importance of medical anthropologists engaging with policymakers and clinicians, promoting a nuanced understanding of mental health that transcends polarized frameworks.
Overall, anthropology provides valuable insights that enrich global mental health discourse, urging a shift away from purely biological perspectives in psychiatry to better address the complex realities individuals face.
Why Did Humans Develop The Ability To Cry?
Emotional crying in humans is believed to stem from animal distress calls, promoting nurturing behavior and soliciting help from others. Initially serving to lubricate the eyes and as a response to pain, Trimble posits that crying developed as a means for early humans to convey emotions like sorrow and compassion long before language emerged. He explores the evolution of this ability to cry not just in response to personal tragedies, but also to empathize with the suffering of others, even fictional characters.
Trimble's work, "Why Humans Like to Cry," investigates the neuroanatomical aspects and evolutionary significance of crying, noting that humans uniquely cry for emotional reasons. His research shows that tears facilitate not only emotional release but also social connections, as crying often elicits support from others. The book emphasizes two key factors influencing crying: the individual’s crying threshold and the role of tears in signaling distress to promote prosocial behavior.
While crying has biological roots—such as eye lubrication and reducing stress-related neurochemicals—it also serves a crucial social purpose. Overall, Trimble's analysis highlights the complexity of human emotional expression and its profound connections to evolution, neuroscience, and cultural practices.
What Is The History Of Emotions?
The history of emotions is a scholarly field focused on understanding human emotions, particularly how they are experienced and expressed across different cultures and historical eras. Its origins trace back to the 19th century with Charles Darwin's studies on human communication, but it gained momentum in the 20th century through influential figures like Lucien Febvre and Peter Gay. This field employs various methodological approaches, borrowing insights from anthropology, psychology, philosophy, and neuroscience to emphasize that emotions are historically contingent and subject to change over time.
As the discipline evolves, it seeks to answer pivotal questions about the nature of emotions, their historical significance, and how they impact history itself. Various publications, such as "What Is the History of Emotions?," attempt to navigate the complexities and debates inherent in this area of study while outlining current theories and future directions.
By examining the interplay between individual feelings and broader social structures, scholars highlight that emotions are not merely psychological or biological in nature; they are shaped by cultural contexts and learned through social interactions, reflecting the dynamic relationship between emotions and history itself. The history of emotions continues to grow as a critical aspect of historical research.
When Did The Study Of Emotional Intelligence Begin?
The concept of "emotional intelligence" (EI) traces its roots back to early research on social intelligence, with significant mentions in a 1964 paper by Michael Beldoch and a 1966 work by B. Leuner. In 1983, Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences emphasized that traditional metrics like IQ do not encompass all cognitive abilities. The term "emotional intelligence" officially entered academia in 1985 through Wayne Payne's doctoral dissertation.
Pioneering research from the 1960s to the 1980s highlighted the crucial role of emotions in human behavior. In 1990, psychologists Peter Salovey and John Mayer defined emotional intelligence as the capacity to monitor one’s own and others’ feelings. Their work laid the groundwork for a new field of study. Daniel Goleman's 1995 bestseller "Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ" propelled the concept into mainstream awareness, promoting its application in various sectors, including business and education.
Although emotional intelligence as a formal study has existed for only three decades, its significance has strong evolutionary roots. Karl Darwin argued for the emotional system’s deep connections to human evolution, indicating the importance of emotions throughout history.
📹 What if you experienced every human life in history?
Examine the ethical stance known as longtermism, which is the idea that we should be doing more to protect future generations.
It’s actually kind of scary to think that we are, literally, the last of our own species. Sure, we’re dominant for right now, but that won’t always be the case. Dinosaurs were dominant long before our pre-human ancestors came into being and look what happened to them. How long do you think it’ll be before human beings become the next big archaeological curiosity?
Evolutionary biology is one my favorite subjects.. It’s so fascinating and crazy to see that from just hunting and gathering.. We’ve come all the way to space exploration and all the scientific developments!! Hat’s off to all the scientists out there trying to answer every curious question.. Hoping to join you soon too!! 😍
Though short, this article did a great job for me of organizing all the abundant names of our possible ancestors. It really helped my understanding of what happened. We have been informed of enormous variations within other species……like dinosaurs, fish, felines, canines, etc…..yet it seemed confusing to see the scientists come up with fossils of so many variations among our possible ancestors. I don’t know why I would have assumed that our lineage would have been more straight forward, but now I understand that that is just not how evolution works.
Accept that when you say evolution is only a theory it shows that you lack knowledge. For something that is classified as a theory it means it has stood the rigger of time and testing. This is no easy feat. What you are thinking of is a hypothesis which has not necessarily been tested rigorously. Evolution being the logical conclusion of the progression of life does not disprove all religions as their are a lot of aspects that are not clear and those unclear aspects are the parts that could possibly either prove or disprove religion (at least my understanding of majority of religions positions). However it is unfair to say evolution doesn’t exist when it is obvious that most likely that life more or less has evolved (this can be the mechanism God used however).
Guys it’s easy to explain really. People like to ignore scientific evidence, because they are afraid to accept what’s true. Think of it this way, for example, your parents divorce but you pretend they were just in a big fight and they are still married. So, what I’m trying to say is, people don’t like to accept scientific fact, because it’s a hard pill to swallow.
A Catholic priest first came up with the Big Bang Theory. I say this to all atheists writing about the triggered Christians in the comment section who think Christianity is anti-science, to show you that concepts like the Big Bang or Evolution are very compatible with most Christian denominations, particularly Catholicism. These Young-Earth-Creationists don’t speak for us Catholic-Science Believing-Creationists. That is all. My respects to people of all creeds
I’m looking through articles of how humans came to be and how earth was formed bc this dude in a comment section is like “the only answer is God” and I’m like… I respect your religion but don’t push it onto me because i believe in science. And now I’m attempting to y’know just give him proven science facts
H. habilis may have been the first of the hominids to use primitive “paints,” more accurately “dyes,” to mark the amount of prey that they had killed, and evidence of this was found on several rock formations in France. The markings resembled fingerpaintings, and even had faint semblances of the “artist’s” fingerprints. The ‘dyes’ were likely made from mixtures of clay, mud, and the blood of their prey.
I understand why a lot of religious folks get angry at this. Im also religious but I’m also a scientist and I like to think that if god is all knowing then why couldn’t he set up this beautiful cascade of evolution knowing that at the end of the day there will be organisms that were made in “his” image.
Old world primates have a unique version of color vision with a unique mutation of the genes that control the development of the cones that sense the different wavelengths of light. Most mammals see the high frequency light, the blues to green and the middle, greens to yellow. About 40 million years ago the ancestor to old world primates had a gene duplication of the gene that develops the cones in the retina for greens and yellow and then there was a mutation of the duplicated gene that made the resultant cones sensitive to light at the red end of the visible spectrum. ONLY primates have this gene, we have it because we too are primates and this is a direct example of mutations adding new complexity to the genome and by tracing these genes we can trace our genetic heritage.
It’s easier to accept that a supernatural power like God created humans than trying to understand how evolution works. From earlier years, when people couldn’t understand something like what a thunder or seizure was. It gives people that feeling of relief and stress-free.But with all this information and technology we have it is just foolish to think that anymore .
I think it’s good to take a look at both sides before making an informed and educated decision on which view you would like to subscribe—if you would like to subscribe to religion then you might as well check scientific evidence then come up with arguments on why you stick on your religious views, instead of just one source like you know, the bible.
I’m confused how this debunks the existence of God. I believe in evolution and Jesus Christ. I don’t go to church, and I’m not religious tho. So I always assumed God made the first people or “His children” millions of years ago, and it doesn’t matter if those being were how we are today. Are we that arrogant that we think just because they didn’t think or look like humans today, they couldn’t had been children of God?. It’s his creation He could do whatever He wants. If He chose for them to be ape like and give them purposeful lives then so be it. Even the Bible doesn’t say that Adam and Eve were hairless and not animal like. Their communication could had been different, it was a very spiritual time and maybe they didn’t have our kind of speech but God “talked” to them cuz he’s their creator obviously he can understand them when they were in the garden of life. Thanks for reading 🙂
good afternoon. i have biological human anatomy studies with right formula from, bone structure to mental evolution untill they reach the what we are now, i have a missing link from dna structure, i complete it now already, between exact humidity or exact formula or what chemical reaction and the period of time with exact location, not from fossil but in real life transformation to, orangutan to homosapiens.. thank you and god bless,,
AND SOME IDIOTS BELIEVE THAT THIS UNIVERSE IS CREATED BY ALLAH & JESUS who just existed 1400 & 2000 years before respectively…how can some people be so stupid!!! Thats why we all should love each other and support each other & stop hating each other in the name of religion. HUMANITY should be above any religion…I believe religion was created by some very smart people to fool the innocent people & the trend is continuing till date…:)
Creationist hypocrites continue to demand levels of evidence from those of us who are science minded that they have no possibility of equaling from their own creationist position. They have one standard of evidence for their own assertions and a different standard, one impossible to meet, for science. I have ONE standard of evidence and no claim from religious science denying fools has ever met that standard.
When God created us, apes and animals existed on earth already. God wanted to make himself a successor on earth, so the angels said to him: “You want to make these killers your successor?” And this happened before God sent down Adam and Eve, and from here we conclude that the angels were referring to monkeys, and that God wanted To make the descendants of the apes (us) his successor, and from here he gave two monkeys (Adam and Eve) the ability to understand, and they evolved and became human beings. And this is proof that what they say in the article is true. Understand the Holy Quran before you speak.😐 Copy this and past it to make stupid people that thinks that we came from nowhere understand .
Do not be like them, they say that you will go after death to nothing. Do not be weak. There are those who created you and there are those who are waiting for you. Remember that you, with all your precise specifications, did not come by chance and did not come from the absence and the rest of the creatures