The Texas family code does not favor mothers in custody battles, as it prohibits the consideration of sex during the process of determining child custody. This means that the judge is not allowed to show bias towards mothers or fathers, which is beneficial for a father fighting for custody of his child. In Texas, a mother can lose custody if the court determines that she’s unfit to care for the child. This can happen for several reasons, such as child abuse or neglect.
The U. S. Census Bureau in May 2020 suggests that about 80 of the 12. 9 million custodial parents were mothers. However, child custody laws in the U. S. are gender-neutral, and courts always decide on the best custody arrangement for the child. Many people assume that mothers are more likely to win custody battles, as judges usually award primary physical custody to the mother, while the father will only get visitation on some cases.
In Texas, both parents work full-time and share responsibilities for their children, so neither parent is given preferential treatment. Decisions must be made based on the child’s best interests. In Texas, unmarried mothers in Texas function as the sole custodian of their child, meaning they can make all legal decisions for their child. The most common reasons a mother may lose custody in Texas include neglect, abuse, substance abuse, failure to follow court orders, and parental alienation.
The Texas Family Code makes no distinction between mothers and fathers regarding conservatorship rights, ensuring that both parents enter the custody dispute. In Texas, cheating alone won’t necessarily make a mother lose custody in Texas. However, the law does not say “the court cannot favor one gender over the other”. The mother does not always have more rights in a divorce. Contact family law attorneys to learn how to win a custody battle and get the outcome you want.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| Do Texas Courts Favor Mothers over Fathers? | No. Texas courts do not favor mothers over fathers. In Texas, judges base child custody dispute rulings on the best interest of the child or children. | carlsonattorneys.com |
| Do Texas Courts Rule In Favor More For Mothers? | Texas family code does not favor mothers in custody battles. In fact, it prohibits the consideration of sex during the process of determining child custody. | binehamgillen.com |
| In Texas, mom currently has primary custody refuses to co- … | In Texas, mom currently has primary custody refuses to co-parent, however father has more free time for the child, and provides better … | quora.com |
📹 Mothers Rights vs Fathers Rights in Child Custody Case
When it comes to deciding custody of a child there’s a belief by some fathers that we live in a mothers rights world.* Judges …
How Do You Play Dirty In A Custody Battle?
Parents may engage in various manipulative tactics during custody battles to undermine their co-parent's relationship with the child. These tactics include brainwashing, badmouthing the other parent, manipulating the child, lying, isolating the child from friends and family, and making false accusations. Such dirty tricks can occur before, during, or after custody hearings. Red flags to look for include games of distraction and deceitful behavior, which can significantly impact the custody arrangement.
It's crucial to maintain your child's best interests by avoiding negative speech about the other parent and refraining from dishonest claims that the other parent poses a danger to the child. Parents should not record others without consent or engage in financial sabotage, such as maxing out credit cards or cleaning out bank accounts. To navigate these challenging situations, hiring a competent attorney is essential, along with seeking co-parenting classes and counseling for both parties.
It's vital to be aware of how some may resort to fake violence or false accusations to gain custody. Overall, prioritizing the child's needs and maintaining a positive relationship with both parents can help in achieving the best outcome during custody disputes.
Are Mothers More Likely To Win Custody Battles?
The article examines the common assumption that mothers have a higher likelihood of winning custody battles, as historical trends suggested that judges favored mothers for primary physical custody. This belief was especially prevalent throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. According to a 2016 census report, only 17. 5% of fathers were awarded custody, indicating a significant bias toward mothers. Notably, mothers with full-time jobs tend to win custody more often, with statistics showing they are awarded custody in nearly 90% of all cases.
Despite legislative changes abolishing the tender years doctrine, societal biases continue to influence custody decisions. Studies reveal that men requesting joint custody are significantly more likely to win than those seeking sole custody, highlighting disparities in outcomes.
Although judges are required to make custody decisions free from gender bias, the statistics often indicate a tendency toward awarding mothers custody. Many believe that mothers foster closer bonds with children due to the time spent caring for them, thus influencing custody outcomes. However, the notion that mothers always win custody is a misconception; men, in contested cases, also receive custody in roughly 60% of situations. Ultimately, while traditional views still impact custody battles, attitudes are gradually evolving.
Should Custody Decisions Be Based On How Well A Mother Is?
Many mothers believe that custody decisions should prioritize their parenting quality and involvement in their children's lives, such as attending lessons or knowing their teachers. However, courts focus on the child's health, safety, and welfare, assessing each parent's capability to meet their child's specific needs. To secure full custody, mothers must demonstrate that their arrangement serves the child's best interests and provides a stable, nurturing environment.
Understanding the factors courts weigh and preparing a strong case is crucial, as custody battles significantly affect a child's welfare. Courts look for solid evidence on parental suitability, considering physical well-being and the best interests of the child. An effective strategy includes proposing a detailed parenting plan and demonstrating emotional stability and commitment. The legal landscape impacts custody decisions; while societal myths suggest a bias towards mothers, the law requires decisions based on the child's needs, not parental gender.
Key considerations include each parent's emotional health, caregiving ability, and commitment to the child's well-being. Parents who are well-prepared typically fare better in custody disputes. Courts aim to make unbiased choices; thus, focusing on providing a stable and loving environment is essential. Ultimately, custody outcomes depend heavily on each parent's ability to prove their dedication to ensuring their child's best interests are met, rather than personal grievances or competition. Emotional stability and readiness to foster continuity in the child's life can also sway court decisions, particularly in light of the child's evolving needs.
Do Mothers Always Win Primary Custody?
There is a prevalent misconception that family law courts favor mothers in custody battles, leading many to believe that mothers always receive primary custody. This belief often stems from outdated perspectives, particularly from previous generations. In reality, statistics reveal that while mothers are often awarded custody—approximately 90% of the time—it is not solely because courts inherently favor them. Courts consider a variety of legal and societal factors when determining custody, with one key element being the emotional bond between the parent and child.
Over the years, the judicial landscape has evolved, and modern family courts are mandated to prioritize the best interests of the child rather than adhere to traditional assumptions about gender roles. While the tender years doctrine has been abolished in many states, biases still persist, contributing to the perception that mothers are more likely to gain custody. It's also worth noting that mothers tend to pursue custody more actively than fathers, which can influence outcomes.
In cases where both parents are equally involved, custody determinations can be less predictable. Ultimately, the idea that mothers "win" custody more frequently is tied to historical biases, not an automatic legal preference, with contemporary courts recognizing the vital roles both parents contribute to their children's lives.
Why Do Custody Battles Favor The Mother?
In child custody cases, the paramount principle is the child's welfare, compelling courts to determine the best option based on presented evidence. It is often assumed that family law courts favor mothers in custody disputes, a misconception rooted in historical context. Traditionally, mothers tended to be the primary caregivers, leading courts to favor them. This notion, while believed by many, is outdated and not consistently true today; divorce lawyers note changes since the Baby Boomer era when gender roles were different.
Recent statistics indicate that mothers are awarded custody in approximately 68-88% of cases, while fathers receive custody in 8-14%. However, this does not reflect a systemic bias; rather, it is influenced by factors such as the tendency of many fathers to relinquish custody voluntarily. Courts take various elements into account before making custody decisions, including each parent's ability to meet the child's physical, emotional, and educational needs.
Despite the historical bias towards mothers, child custody laws in the U. S. are designed to be gender-neutral. Courts prioritize the best interests of the child, focusing on the specific circumstances of each family rather than a blanket preference for one parent. Understanding how to present one’s case can significantly impact the custody outcome, debunking the myth that mothers are automatically favored in custody battles.
What Happens If Joint Custody Is Off The Table?
Family law courts prioritize the best interests of the child when making custody decisions. If joint custody is not feasible, the court seeks to identify the parent who can best prepare the child for adulthood. Joint custody allows parents to share the responsibility of raising a child, even if the child does not live in a single household. This arrangement can encompass both physical custody, where the child splits time between parents, and legal custody, where parents share decision-making responsibilities.
Judges may award full custody to a parent if the other parent is found to be violating custody rights. Joint custody can take many forms, and parents opting for a 50/50 custody arrangement are required to submit a detailed parenting plan to the court, outlining how parenting time will be shared. Courts generally favor joint custody arrangements, promoting continued bonding with both parents unless issues such as abuse or addiction are present.
While joint custody is beneficial for many families, it may not work for all children, as highlighted by various studies. Effective communication and cooperation between parents are crucial for making joint custody successful. If one parent does not adhere to the agreed-upon custody arrangement, the affected parent may file a Motion for Contempt against the non-compliant parent, which could result in penalties from the court.
Does Texas Favor Mothers In Custody Cases?
The common belief that Texas courts favor mothers in child custody cases is a myth. In reality, decisions are made based on the best interests of the child, with no preference for either parent based on gender. The Texas Family Code prohibits bias toward mothers and ensures that all custody arrangements consider various factors unique to each case. While statistics may show a higher percentage of women receiving custody, they overlook that many fathers also win custody in contested cases.
Importantly, Texas family law generally supports joint custody or joint managing conservatorship, encouraging both parents to share responsibilities and rights. The misconception that courts inherently favor mothers contributes to misunderstandings, yet the truth is that both parents have equal standing in custody disputes. The court prioritizes the child's welfare above all, evaluating each situation individually without gender influence.
Unmarried mothers may initially act as sole custodians, but this does not guarantee continued custody. Overall, Texas courts adhere strictly to the principle that child custody decisions must reflect the best interests of the child, independent of any favoritism toward mothers or fathers.
Which Parent Has More Rights In Texas?
In Texas, both parents of a child have equal rights, regardless of gender. Courts prioritize the child's best interests in matters like custody. Each parent holds rights and responsibilities, some of which are generalized, while others depend on specific custody agreements. Governor Greg Abbott recently proposed an amendment to reinforce parental rights in the Texas Constitution. State law already grants fundamental rights to parents concerning their children's upbringing, including physical possession, moral and religious guidance, and determining the child's residence.
Typically, one parent is designated as the primary custodian, residing with the child for most of the time. Texas family law ensures equal rights for both mothers and fathers, asserting that neither parent has more rights than the other based purely on gender. Establishing paternity legally grants equal rights to fathers, who can otherwise find themselves at a disadvantage without legal recognition. The Texas Family Code outlines ten primary parental rights, emphasizing shared responsibilities.
The court aims to distribute custody and decision-making efficiently, viewing both parents as equal custodians. The law promotes joint custody arrangements as a viable option, reinforcing the shared responsibility for the child’s wellbeing, irrespective of the parents’ marital status. An experienced divorce attorney can be beneficial in navigating these legal complexities.
How To Win Full Custody As A Mother In Texas?
To secure the custody or managing conservatorship you desire in Texas, it's crucial to understand that the court prioritizes the child's best interests. Demonstrating that the child's welfare is best served by living primarily or solely with you is essential. Familiarize yourself with Texas parents’ rights and the process of pursuing full custody. Key strategies include demonstrating a willingness to collaborate with the other parent, thorough preparation, effective communication, and showing your commitment to your child's well-being.
Whether you file for full custody during a divorce or modify an existing parenting plan, be mindful of the policies embedded in the law. Texas values both parents' involvement in a child's life, and you'll need to provide evidence that supports your claim. To begin, file a Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship (SAPCR) and focus on maintaining a healthy environment for your child. Avoid actions that could be detrimental to your case, and ensure compliance with court orders.
Ultimately, you'll have to demonstrate that sole custody aligns with your child's best interests, given that "full custody" is not a recognized term in Texas. Being proactive and informed about your options will significantly assist you in gaining custody rights.
What Is The Biggest Mistake In Custody Battle?
In custody battles, prioritizing the child's best interests is paramount, yet many parents make significant blunders that can jeopardize their cases. Key mistakes include speaking negatively about the other parent, which can alienate the child and harm the overall case. Seeking sympathy from a child, poor communication between parents, and unjustifiably withholding access to the other parent can also be detrimental. Misrepresenting issues such as substance abuse, separating siblings in blended families, and failing to adequately prepare for hearings further complicate custody disputes.
It’s vital for parents to avoid using children as tools in their disputes, as such actions often backfire. Preparation, understanding legal frameworks, and maintaining clear, respectful communication with the other parent can greatly improve one’s position in custody matters. Mistakes often stem from conflating personal needs with the child's needs or failing to set realistic goals during the custody process.
Overall, these missteps not only harm the parent’s legal standing but also adversely impact the child's well-being. For a more favorable outcome, parents should seek professional support and focus on cooperation rather than conflict, ensuring the child’s needs remain the priority throughout the custody battle.
Who Wins Most Child Custody Cases?
Mothers historically win a majority of custody battles due to ingrained societal roles that view them as primary caregivers. This perception has led judges to often award primary physical custody to mothers, with fathers receiving limited visitation rights. Historically, this trend was particularly pronounced throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. However, the legal standard now governing custody decisions is the "best interests of the child," which varies in interpretation. While statistics indicate that mothers receive custody in about 83% of cases, misconceptions persist about inherent biases favoring mothers in family courts.
A 2016 census report highlights that only 17. 5% of fathers obtain custody, illustrating the disparity. Notably, some custody battles are determined outside of court, with a significant majority (over 90%) being settled amicably.
Factors such as financial stability and cooperation between parents also play critical roles in custody outcomes. Additionally, despite the belief that mothers always win custody, family law judges are mandated to make unbiased decisions. The complexity of custody cases means there isn’t a definitive pattern, as outcomes can also hinge on individual case specifics, including parental behavior and circumstances. Thus, while mothers often emerge as custodial parents, each case is unique, reflecting varying interpretations of what serves the child's best interests.
📹 Winning A Custody Battle Four Things You Must Do
With divorces comes another inevitable battle – getting custody of your child/ren. As a former custody examiner for the court, I’ve …
Wow. Father of two. Thank you for the articles. As a father. My spouse of 14 years cheated- Both of my children walked into a restaurant and saw her with another. Her reason. Money. I filled for divorce and was lucky to get a waiver. It’s sad. Yes the economy affected many. But those were her reasons. Money. Fast forward 2 years. After the divorce. I learned so much and paved my way towards becoming an attorney. I have won my 1st case last year grossing 1.5 million. ( for me ) My experience working under NASD and the SEC definitely helped. The initial response granted my ex The children. But ensured 50% with no Child support. Nor alimony. My heart and love for my children will always ensure a victory. In short. The best revenge is. SuCCess. Thanks for the vids.
Men don’t have any chance STOP giving them so much hope. From my own lawyers words July 30 2018 “We live in a world where women are believed no matter what they say.” What a JOKE. Men don’t waste your money, or time I’m not saying do not fight for your child, however, the “time” we live in is just to make sure kids stay with their mother. Their are SO MANY lies in this article! What’s up with that? Oh wait, she’s an lawyer💯
“Attitudes are becoming more progressive” What utter nonsense. “The best interest of the child” is just code word for WHATEVER the woman wants, period. Now if you’re a dad, prepare to spend a couple of hundred grands on lawyers, social workers, psychologists and other such leeches just to have a shot at equal parenting. There is a reason why you can always count on lawyers’ interest groups to lobby against any and all shared parenting bills.
I’ve lived with my mom since I was 3 years old. Now I’m 12 and will be 13 in July. My dad has been married to a very mean and horrible woman since him and my mom got divorced. He is now divorcing that woman while I am at his house during the summer. In the last 2 years I have only seen my brother twice, because he moved in with his mom. He just moved back and my stepmom doesn’t like him because he was doing drugs but he moved back to get help and he stopped. My stepmom decided to go tell my mom that he is a meth head. Then my mom wanted me to go home although I have 3 more weeks at my dads house. Me, my dad, and my brother are moving within the next few days. My dad lives 4 hours from my moms house. Me and my mom live with my grandparents. My grandparents want move to where my dad lives in 1 year because they used to live there and we have family there. But they aren’t sure if they want to yet. Either way I want to move in with my dad in one year but my mom wont let me. And I want to know if I have the right to make the decision of moving in with my dad despite my mother’s permission
Generally its almost always guaranteed that the mother will get custody. The mother has to be really bad not to get custody. That is generally the reality across the US. Just look at the stats.. but I’m not saying don’t fight. With the argument of what is best for the child, judges take away the kids from the father. All across the US, it should be 50/50 unless hard evidence of abuse towards the child.
Yes, you mention the same line I heard 25 years ago while in court. That it is in the best interest of the child. No, it is not and is only used as justification to give the mother custody in most cases. And lets not forget that if you end up in court its because one of the parents is trying to get most custody and the obvious, money. Then the false accusations. If a mother wants, you do not stand a chance. Reality is something different than that of what people try to say to the public to make it sound like they care. That the system has changed and is even close to putting the children first.
Sorry, but no. Judges’ main concern is what is in “the best interest of the mother”, and getting as much money as they can for the state via Title IV-D. Just because laws are written in a non gender biased matter, it doesn’t mean judges have to follow those laws. They are even protected (Stump V Sparkman) from any negligent decision that may result in injury or death of a child. #censurejudgepahl
This is a hopeful, ‘keep faith’ promotion to bolster lawyers significance. Self rep yourself with partial assistance of a lawyer to avoid mistakes (law is not real life rationality) to save money. Don’t blow it all on legal fees, it’s a long uphill road to pace yourself for. Weed out propaganda like this. – Father of twin girls fighting for custody for over four years.
Hi Wendy, I have been battling to see my 2 beautiful boys I have no criminal record AT ALL only old speeding fines (4 in total) and were 63klm in a 60klm zone and 113klm in a 110klm zone, so they are VERY minor here in Australia…… the only thing against me is I have suffered serious workplace injuries and was put on a drug that is well known for suicidal tennancies which I had, I was cleared of any wrong doing ie; Unintentional suicide due to the drug Lyrica in reports from specialists, but although this has been backed by my surgeon and pain specialist I am getting treated like a monster, the mother even got to put in her affidavid that I was the same as the Luke Battie father and the court has ran with it and noone is listening except for my close family………. I cannot afford the $41,800 per day fee for a lawyer so I have to fight it myself… (do you have any tips for me?). However the judge on the last hearing went on a independants report which was so bias toward the mother……. she (The family councilor) even called me on the day of the interviews and asked for overtime to be spent with the mother, and then once I got to see her she kept telling me to rush and in the end she gave me 40 minutes to try to get my story out (mother got 6hrs) but there wasn’t enough time at all…. as I was being pushed out the door I was still trying to get my side of the story out but she turned her back on me and yelled “Times up” …. I haven’t seen my 2 boys for 2 years now and my final hearing is in 5 days your blogs have helped me and I want to thank you as I’m going in to fight the most important fight of my life.
Ummm, deleting your old article to remove my comments will only get more criticism from me. As a father who spent thousands on lawyers and the like, I know b.s. in the family law arena when I hear it, and I will do what I can to stop said b.s. from spreading. Shall I make a article response to this, dissecting it point by point, or do you want to reconsider your sales pitch?
good evening Wendy i have a question I have a court order for first appearance in the matter of custody and the mother of my daughter wants sole custody of our child I would like it to fix it the best possible way and I saw your articles that you can do it with a mediator do I still have a chance to do that How and when can I request it or I’m late Thank you for your time!!
Been perusal all your articles and building my case with your advise. My ex is using heroin and has since overdosed on heroin since our last mediation months ago where she told the mediator she was clean. I, going to court today and am hoping for primary parent rights. My son is also behind in school repeating kindergarten this year and still not doing very well, I do homework with him on Friday and help him with his flash cards and do as much as I can In the little time I have but I need him on school days to stay on top of it. Any advice for me.
Anyone lives in the state of Texas and can better help me.. my kids has sprays been with me my oldest is 4 & youngest is 2.. I recently allowed them to go with there father for the summer and now it’s time for them to come back with me he’s refusing to do so.. yes he’s there father but nothing on paper shows he doesn’t have there bc or social documents my oldest starts school this month Texas says since u started he’s their father he’s not doing no wrong they did a general check on them and said since they we eating and look healthy there’s nothing they can do.. I have a history of dv against him I’ve also had restraining orders against him while pregnant .. over the years I thought he has changed but no matter what he always tend to do this bull crap. I’ve never abused my kids or anything I believe he’s trying to hurt and retaliate against me because I wouldn’t let him get them after all the bullshit he’s done, I just want to know what I can do someone I can speak with because this isn’t ok I could see if I was unfit unstable etc all of a sudden he’s wanting to keep my kids from me blocked me on FB and everything 😡
my current girlfriend the mother of my child my two boys she went into a drug rehab and it was a drug rehab for kids I guess to take the kids she went in there got the kids got custody got a stay away order on me and left the rehab and then came to my house where we used to live cuz I kept the residence kept working came to my house and we argued for her to move back in I told her no we are going to die I’m going to get in trouble I have a stay at Wii U put that stay away or me and everything will we get into argument I tell her to leave she goes to my mom’s house and my me and my sister argue about him two weeks later or the cops come she calls the cops my girlfriend calls the cops and tells the cops that I was threatening her and everything will they take me to jail because I have a stay away order through family custody well now and it was going to be 2 weeks and it was going to be this many don’t dismissed but now they reinstate I got to go to anger management class and I got to do all this other stuff and I don’t think that’s right that she came to my house and move back in with me and still had that stay away order West still active now I’m doing community service I’m going to batter classes I never been prosecuted of the batter to her
I agree with best interest of the child but it appears that information available to educate parents going through a custody process is geared and supportive towards to fathers. I also believe that family law and the courts are also now more likely to favor the father, not the mother. I’ve been and gone through this myself and have witnessed friends and family have the same experience. Mom’s appear to enter into a custody case as an underdog, having to climb out of a hole they’re put in immediately just because they are the mother. My ex was emotionally and verbally abusive, to a point physically abusive (tried to push me out of a car with our young son in the back seat), I had a police report where here was pounding on my front door and shattered it…but he came into court and fooled everybody, my binder of evidence, letters of character, photographs, etc was never even looked at. It’s been almost 3 years and he still feels he can pick and choose what orders he wants to follow. My son is being manipulated and there is evidence of parental alienation. We have joint custody but when we dont agree I am always the one who has to back down because my ex will not consider anything but his way or threatens court. I’m afraid to take him back to court because of the experience I had. I have an older daughter from another relationship and the relationship with her father (who is a respected detective with the police department) is nothing like the relationship with my son. He and I have a very broad court agreement but have been able to work with each other for the last 13 years without having to bring the court back into play.
So question. I live in Florida and I have been with my child her whole life which she is now 6 years old. Now that I have moved in with my now fiancé when she was 3 years old and I have not asked for her fathers help or stopped him from wet seeing her, the biological father is now serving me with papers for full custody of her. My daughter also has called my fiancé dad on her own, and her biological father has been referred by first name. My fiancé and I have two small children together as well. Will he have a case against me is my question? I also do not like that he is very inconsistent when it comes to calling and his visits and my fear is that they will give us 50/50 being that she doesn’t even see him as a dater figure. How can I convince the judge to only visits with him and her?
I have been framed by very powerful powerful family that controls mediation in Victorville Courthouse my husband is that record sealed about him molesting of a children and now they’re producing documents of things I never did I’m very very scared and I don’t know where to turn my life has been threatened I can’t even go to the police department because it’s six generations of Sheriff’s judges and lawyers that my husband is come best friends with my step daughter and I are close she was raped by her on her own father and they have hit all those files they have fabricated that I have abuse towards my kids we did have a CPS and now my own child is lying I understand why it’s very scary to live with him I don’t know where to go and I’m so scared I’ve been framed already and falsely thrown in jail they want me to end my life now and I don’t want to
My mother is alcoholic, unfit, and evil. She makes me and my sister share a twin sized bed while her and her boyfriend share a king sized bed, my sister actually caught my mom dealing prescription drugs to my uncle but didn’t have a phone to call the cops with and we don’t have proof so we can’t do a thing, she makes me and my sister make our own dinner (my sister is 10), she has a 2 bedroom house while my dad has a 3 bedroom house, my mom told her boyfriend to kill me and took away my phone and made my sister leave when she said it and I fear for my life when I’m with her, my dad however has a big enough house, makes us meals, is married to a very kind woman, but he has 2 drug charges 1 for heroin and 1 for weed, we has a GAL (guardian ad lidum) and he just went in the other room he talked to my sister first and every time she said something my mom didn’t like my mom made a tally so I was afraid to speak and he didn’t do anything and he said he doesn’t think my moms a falling down alcoholic and she is please someone tell me what to do :,(
Hey I have a hypothetical question say if you were with an ex-girlfriend but it changed to current girlfriend to the point that you were convinced that it would work out her tubes were tied but you did your business then it gets odd almost like thanks for the donation she calls her long-time little girlfriend aka the wifey she gets your girl and takes off. Your girl keeps talking about she wants have a baby but the other girl does too. Like I said it was only within a couple hours for some strange reason you think there was some type of transfer of your stuff rare but possible for a couple months do you think this but eventually you give up and then you see a picture of that girl she looks like she’s about to pop now she has a boyfriend or boyfriends I don’t know but at the same time you don’t know it’s unlikely but possible some girls will do anything they can. Now me and my ex we looked very similar and she’s been with her girlfriend for many years on and off I was with her for about eight years on and off. But I question did they do something and now that girl is pregnant she already has told a guy that it’s his kid but if we know anything girls lie. I mean if it’s not my kid cool but at the same time if it is holy crap I don’t even know where to start personally I believe that should be criminal as hell I also believe she shouldn’t have any rights and I should be the sole custodian. TEXAS
Would the domestic violence only matter if it was between me and my ex? After we split we tried to do the adult thing and take care of it outside of court. Which I know now is my mistake because I guess in Washington the man is supposed to go get a parental order. But her domestic violence charge was with her new boyfriend. Does that have any bearing on the situation? Can I use that?
Basically, Mothers have ALL the rights in any court of law. I saw a woman sneak up on and try to slice a cops throat with a knife in a police station while being filmed by the stations CCTV cameras. The Judge AND the Jury let her walk, Scott FUCKING Free. I saw another story where a woman (medical student) assaulted her male roommate and stabbed him in the thigh since she was a promising medical student (read attractive woman) the judge gave her the lightest probation sentence possible under the law… If the roles had been reversed and that man had been a steelworker he would have had the FULL weight of the law born down upon him and likely be looking at 15-30 years in prison. The idea that men and women are treated even remotely equal in the eyes of any court, civil, law, or public opinion, is a FUCKING joke.
Assuming that men are not discriminated against in courts is ignoring ALL OTHER tested conditions regarding courts like criminal court (Where massive gender discrimination exists when controlling for all relevant factors). For one thing, assuming that the primary caregiver will make the best parent is flawed and is systemic (implicit) discrimination; like primary aggressor laws are to DV. It very well may be that the other parent is just lazy and the working parent will be a better role model. While not explicitly against men, it is against that gender role. Anecdotally. I’ve seen women win the majority of custody cases here unless the father proves he was better suited and was the primary caregiver. When it comes to family courts and DV ( or false allegations), where preponderance of the evidence is used biases play a major factor. Also, I wouldn’t say there’s no mother rights states in the world. Perhaps no explicit laws in the USA.
You’re a men’s rights attorney. You blatantly showcase that. You advocate for men’s rights. Statistically women do a better job ensuring what is best for children. That doesn’t negate that there are bad parents, male or female. However, the overwhelming evidence shows that mothers do what is best for children. I won’t even go into the institutional sexism that exists. Men have always had most of the rights and the privilege. Now the culture has allowed men to craft a sense of victimhood to win cases. The best custody case is no custody case. No, you are on “his” side when it matters most. You are one of those attorneys in it for the money. Plain and simple. Your greed destroys families and how you sleep at night is anyone’s guess. And you do know that there are a million lawyer jokes for a reason, right? Listen, I was sued for custody and I have been subjected to horrible things by a man who has played the victim. What happened to me and what happens to him doesn’t matter. Damage has been done to my child in this. I do not care how I am viewed. I care that social services, the legal system, and judges have not done things to prevent my son from being hurt. And it all continues because his female attorney wants more and more money so she keeps the case going. Greed. Plain and simple.
Felfop, ummmm I am sure you have a valid point to make and share but your angry and wide brush criticism of all family law attorneys is insulting. It sounds like you had a devastating experience but to lash out and present your side and experience as an angry rant does not make you look so good. Why not share your story in a more constructive way.
In my fiances case it’s her daughters father that’s overly confident and thinking that everything will go his way he has put her through hell and is very vindictive since she left him years ago now he’s filed for sole custody over their daughter they have yet to go to court but this guy really thinks he has the best interest at heart for their daughter and I’m here as a witness to tell you he does not he doesn’t even get his child when he supposed to the man makes more excuses than a little bit but runs around telling everyone that my fiance gives him a hard time about seeing his own child and that’s not true any advice for her or what she can do