The Trump administration has defended its “zero tolerance” border policy, which has caused family separations, arguing that the Obama and Bush administrations did the same. The Immigration Act of 1917, the most restrictive immigration legislation to date, was passed by a significant majority, even overriding a veto from President Woodrow Wilson. The law excluded immigrants who were.
The Trump administration has repeated his assertion that he inherited and ended a policy from President Obama that separates children from parents. Donald Trump’s defense of family separation indicates the immigration policy could return if he wins the election in November 2024. The policy sought to deter illegal immigration. A popular pro-Donald Trump Twitter account cast blame for family separations at the border on former Democratic presidents of decades past.
The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy separated over 5, 000 children from their parents, with no tracking process or records that would allow them to. After falsely claiming that immigrant families were being separated at the border because of Democrats and arguing that he was unable to do anything about it, President Trump signed an executive order on June 20, purporting to end the family separation policy. However, this does not end the humanitarian crisis created by the Trump administration.
The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy drew sharp rebukes after it was announced in April 2018, especially after children who had both presidents prosecuted many border crossers. However, Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy created family separation, and prosecuting people for illegal activities is not the only solution.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| Family separation – a timeline | Long before the Trump administration implemented its “zero tolerance” immigration enforcement policy in 2018, it was already separating … | splcenter.org |
| US border: Who decided to separate families? | After criticism of the policy, Donald Trump blamed its introduction on President Obama and the Democrats. | bbc.com |
| Trump’s Family Separation Immigration Policy: How History … | The policy sought to deter illegal immigration by separating parents from their children near the U.S.-Mexico border and prosecuting mothers and … | forbes.com |
📹 Trump’s proposed immigration plan for second term
NBC’s Tom Llamas explains how Donald Trump’s policies on immigration shaped his campaign and how they could play out in …
Is Family Separation Trump'S Immigration Policy?
The Trump administration's immigration strategy, termed "zero tolerance," was designed to deter illegal immigration by enforcing strict measures, including the separation of families at the U. S.-Mexico border. Following significant public backlash, President Trump signed an executive order on June 20, 2018, ending the contentious practice of separating migrant children from their parents during detentions. This policy resulted in the separation of over 5, 000 children without a proper tracking system, leading to widespread outrage and calls for reform.
Although the administration aimed to promote stricter legislation, the repercussions of this policy turned public sentiment against it. While the family separation policy has been terminated, Trump and his supporters have signaled a potential revival if he regains office in the 2024 election. Reports note that beyond the visible effects of family separation, other immigration enforcement tactics implemented during this time were also devastating. A new documentary titled "Separated," directed by Errol Morris, explores the implications and fallout of this troubling policy era.
Does The Trump Administration Need To Separate Families?
The crisis of family separation during immigration enforcement is not mandated by law but resulted from policy decisions made by the Trump administration. Reports dating back to December 2017 indicated consideration of a plan to separate parents from children at the border. Though President Trump signed an executive order to end the separation policy, he has not ruled out its revival. His November 2023 interview suggests openness to restoring this policy as a deterrent to illegal immigration.
Throughout his presidency, over 5, 000 children were separated from their parents, complicating reunification efforts due to a lack of records. The Trump administration’s "Zero Tolerance" policy, which began in 2018, led to mass separations and is remembered as a controversial tactic. Proposed court settlements now aim to prevent future policy implementations that allow family separations for eight years.
Despite Biden's ban on family separations, concerns remain regarding Trump's potential disregard for this measure if elected again in 2024. The immigration advocacy community fears that aggressive deportation strategies could again result in family separations on a large scale, echoing the previous administration's actions.
Did The Obama Administration Separate More Children From Their Parents?
Rumors have circulated suggesting that the Obama administration separated more children from their parents compared to the Trump administration, based on a misunderstanding related to the influx of unaccompanied minors from 2014 onward. While both administrations did separate families, experts clarify that prior to Trump, separations were not part of any blanket policy, and occurred only under specific concerns for the child's safety or legal guardianship.
Former Obama officials assert that family separations were rare under Obama's approach, which aimed to keep families together in detention. Conversely, President Trump has incorrectly stated that such family separations were initiated by Obama, insisting that he was the one to halt this practice. Trump’s administration faced significant criticism for its family separation policy stemming from a "zero-tolerance" approach to illegal border crossings. Ultimately, it is established that the Obama administration's separations were far less common and typically not routine, contrasting sharply with the policies enacted under Trump.
Was A 'Law To Separate Families' Enacted Before April 2018?
A "law to separate families" was believed to exist prior to April 2018, with claims that the federal government was obligated to enforce it. This notion has led to confusion regarding its origins, with some attributing it to legislation enacted during the administrations of Presidents Obama or Clinton. While Public Law 107-296, passed by Democrats in 2002, is often referenced, no federal law mandates the separation of families. The practice of separating children from adults entering America illegally began with a law signed by Bill Clinton in 1996, which garnered liberal support at the time.
President Obama enforced similar policies during his term. The Trump administration's "zero tolerance" policy, introduced in April 2018 by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, was responsible for the significant uptick in family separations, with over 2, 000 children separated from their parents between April and June 2018. Although officials have stated that they opposed the family separation policy, they claimed they were bound by law.
This policy was later reversed, highlighting the contentious nature of immigration enforcement and the complexities surrounding family separation at the border, which were further complicated by previous administrations' policies.
What Was The Most Restrictive Immigration Legislation Ever Passed?
In response to rising national security concerns during World War I, Congress passed increasingly restrictive immigration legislation, beginning with the Immigration Act of 1917. This law was the first major restriction of immigration and was enacted despite a presidential veto from Woodrow Wilson. It excluded various immigrants, paving the way for the more oppressive Immigration Act of 1924. The latter is recognized as one of the most restrictive and racist immigration laws in U.
S. history. By establishing stringent "national origins" quotas, it sharply limited immigration from southern and eastern Europe and effectively curtailed immigration from other regions, especially Asia, creating an "Asiatic Barred Zone." The Johnson-Reed Act, signed by President Calvin Coolidge on May 26, 1924, marked a significant turning point in U. S. immigration policy, fostering a demographic shift towards Northern and Western European immigrants.
The atmosphere of isolationism, xenophobia, and economic insecurity following World War I undergirded these legislative changes, influencing public sentiment and political priorities around immigration. Ultimately, the restrictive framework set by the 1924 act had a profound impact on the U. S. population throughout the 20th century, shaping immigration flows for decades.
Did Trump Inherited A Policy That Separates Children From Parents?
US President Donald Trump has reiterated his claim that he inherited a child separation policy from President Obama and ended it. However, this policy was actually initiated during the Trump administration, resulting in the separation of over 5, 000 children from their parents as part of a "zero tolerance" immigration policy aimed at deterring illegal immigration. Although Obama-era policies led to some family separations, they occurred at a significantly lower rate compared to Trump’s administration.
In 2018 alone, more than 5, 500 children were separated at the border, often with no tracking mechanism to reunite them with their parents. Despite criticisms, Trump continues to blame Democrats for these practices. An executive order was signed by Trump to halt family separations, yet he has suggested that the policy might return if he wins the 2024 election. Experts argue that the harm inflicted on migrant families during the Trump administration has lasting effects, contradicting Trump's claims that the separations were a longstanding issue initiated by previous administrations.
📹 Tom Homan on what mass deportation immigration plans may look like
President-elect Donald Trump says Tom Homan will be his “border czar” when he enters the White House. Homan spoke to “60 …
As an immigrant myself who came in LEGALLY, I agree on this. We who came legally payed so much and worked so hard to come here and do do all the paperwork and process to come in this country to prove that we aren’t criminals and that we want to do things right. Illegal immigrants just come and some of them are nasty criminals or bad people coming into the country harming it and ruining the economy and taking away job opportunities and so much more for others unfairly. No to mention the horrible things that happen in that border and how overpopulated some of the states here are like, New York, L.A, Texas, Florida etc.. I’m no fan of trump but I agree on his plan to deport and secure the board.. is for the best of this country.
NBC keeps talking about expense while : Illegal immigration in the U.S. costs an estimated $150.7 billion annually, with the average U.S. taxpayer paying $1,156 each. The costs are mostly borne by states and localities. Using the National Academies’ estimate, the lifetime fiscal drain for each illegal immigrant is about $68,000.
Actually, 88 billion is NOT a lot. You can’t put a price tag on our children’s lives. In 2023, $66 billion was spent on illegals. This year it is anticipated to be $150 billion or more! Look up the budget. I am 100% for families coming over legally. However, there has to be some standard in place for the safety of all Americans, and justification for our tax dollars.
They do cause trouble, they send us money back home and work for half of what Americans do making it impossible to compete with wages. My wife and her family is all illegal, I tried doing a remodel for their restraunt and they where upset my employees took pay cut from $28 hour to $21 hour and still wanted it for less. It’s ridiculous.
These people are not animals. He’s trying to destroy what this family was founded on. So who’s going to fund the cost of all of this? I don’t have a problem with immigrants so I shouldn’t have to help fund it. It’s the different nationalities that make this country beautiful. What makes this country great is everyone coming together as one.❤❤❤
This is really upsetting. As a second generation Mexican American, it’s disheartening to listen to all of this horrible rhetoric from my fellow US citizens. I understand that you may not agree with “undocumented immigrants”, but knowing that many of them come from the same background as me, the future is scaring me. I don’t understand why so many Latinos were in support of him. I just wish the best for the USA and my Latino family.❤ Us Latino Americans’ beliefs and love extend to you guys as well.
WELL DONE WELL DONE who is president trump who has the key to the house trump who decides in the senate trump so don’t cry anymore just cry 4 more years we love our president trump and the only president elected by everyone in usa trump 2024😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This’s What Our Lord Jesus Christ Wants D. Trump, To Do As The President Of America 🇺🇸. It’s Unfair for us that we’re here Legally in USA waited 22years to become US 🇺🇸 Immigrants. In That way since waiting for a very long time, only 1Son the youngest was With Us until my 2Sons wasn’t able to received their US Visa since their Age going Up. When arrived in Los Angeles CA, After I received our Green Card, immediately I worked as a Caregiver, after received my first Salary, I Re- Petitioned my 2Sons, was Approved May/2015. I Hope & Prayed To Our Lord Jesus Christ, 2 Sons they’ll Be here By Next Year 2025. IN JESUS MIGHTY NAME. AMEN.😇🙏❤️🔥💕
Can someone explain to me why the media does not touch on the issue of immigrants from Ukraine? In my understanding, an immigrant is an immigrant no matter how or where they come from. Another thing they don’t touch on is that the president is a convicted criminal before justice, then why can’t anyone who has a criminal record apply for a job with the government? Nobody has touched on or discussed those two topics until this day.
10 point IMMIGRATION+SOUTHERN BORDER policy 1. Remove the weak insufficient fencing that runs the full 1,954 mile length of the southern border and replace it with an impentrable physical wall that should measure atleast 20ft high; 5 ft deep; 8 inches thick backed with reinforced steel panels. 2. Increase the border patrol to 30,000 agents. 3. Federalize the National Guard with a permanent prescence of 5,000 at southern border to stop the violent cartels activities. 4. Increase ICE to 30,000 agents. 5. Reinstate and expand travel ban. 6. Enact ideological screenings for legal immigration. 7. Withhold all federal funding from Santucary cities until they fully cooperate with ICE in apprehension and detaining of all illegal immigrants within their jurisdiction. 8. Repeal of Refugee Act of 1980 or suspend refugee admissions. 9. Repeal of Immigration Act of 1990. 10. Inact Federal law that mandates E-verify for all employers.
Anyone seeking asylum must come here legally with a passport and proof they will not be a burden to US Citizen taxpayers. They should know there is a very long drawn out procedure that takes years. In most cases it is better for people from other countries to stay and fight for their freedom there instead of here in USA.
While the U.S. Department of Labor has set wage guidelines for H-1B worker pay, many companies have found ways to work around these guidelines. A report by the Economic Policy Institute revealed that the majority of H-1B employers pay migrant workers less than market wages. This is why most companies prefer to hire or retain H1b than American tech workers!I have been looking for semiconductor engineer jobs for four months and so far getting 0 job interviews. Why American tech worker got laid off first and H1b and L1 tech works still got same job?😂
Are we supposed to feel bad about the fact he came here illegally and because of him and people like him, my American friends and family can’t get jobs because of him and people like him underbidding jobs etc. they don’t feel bad that most of them are losing jobs and money because of him and illegals like him.. so why should we feel bad for him?? I’m sorry you knew what you were getting into coming here illegally!!
I am a immigrant question how come if you do a crime here you are in American prison at says you will get deported on the immigration website so how come there in the usa prison did the judge not read the immigration law 😂 and for all the people there have a family a wife or a husband why did you not file the I 90 form and got your partner legal makes no sence to me I pay evry 10 years to be legal and been here 30 years if you’re partner. Doese not have papers to be here you should of contact the immigration office right a way when there got here sorry about if you work here with no papers that means you don’t pay taxes like me. And me as immigrant don’t think that is right since evry immigration office has immigration lawyers around the corner so you have no excuse not to be legal and your American partner filles taxes you should have take that money and make your partner legal ridiculous sorry about the spelling going blind the I 90 form is 700 dollars and if you low income you can get a voucher that will cut that in half so no exuses as a immigrant that makes me mad and the women on the news her husband works for cash you should took that money and filed the I 90 form ridiculous
Response to the 2 minute mark. First of all I don’t appreciate the fact that you play on our heart strings (afraid the kids will come home one day and their dad won’t be there) “Reversing The Narrative” to justify breaking the law. Maybe you should have considered that before you came into the country undocumented which is by the way, Against The Law. I am truly sorry that you put yourself and your family in such a compromising position. You will be the reason your children are heartbroken, Because YOU BROKE THE LAW, NOT BECAUSE President Trump is a Mean Heartless Person. Let’s stop all the playing to the sympathy of LAW BREAKERS and START abiding by THE RULE OF LAW. THEN YOU WILL HAVE INTEGRITY AND RESPECT. THE ADMINISTRATION WHO BROKE THE LAW AND GAVE FREE ACCESS FOR PEOPLE TO ENTER THE COUNTRY SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE AS WELL. If you break the law there are consequences not just for some but for all. It is called Right Ruling. Thank you.