The 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser SUV is a significant departure from its predecessor, with a focus on a more mainstream audience. The Land Cruiser has evolved from a Jeep alternative to a luxurious off-roading superstar, and its story is almost as long as the brand’s. With various model derivatives available, adventure-seeking enthusiasts have a variety of options to choose from. The 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser combines rugged off-road capability with a comfortable, spacious interior, making it a suitable adventure vehicle and daily driver.
The Land Cruiser’s fuel-efficient hybrid powertrain and smaller size make it great for off-roading and more affordable than before. However, the base-model interior feels cheap, limited towing capacity, and no optional third-row seat make it a strong proposition for a select few used car buyers. The Land Cruiser is not as plush as a Land Rover Discovery but offers a blend of huge size, impregnable reliability, and serious off-road capability, making it a strong proposition for a select few used car buyers.
The Land Cruiser is good off-road but not great, putting it in the same category as the outgoing 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser Review. It is cool, capable, family-friendly, and has many features that everyone will fall in love with. The V8 engine is a key feature, and while it may not be the family car it once was, it can still work for families who need 2 or even 3 child car seats.
In conclusion, the 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser is a go-anywhere, do-anything SUV that offers numerous benefits, including strong hybrid power, go-anywhere capability, and a powerful V8 engine. While it may not be the best choice for families, it remains a popular choice for those looking for a reliable and versatile vehicle.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 Toyota Land Cruiser Review on a Family Ski Trip | There’s nothing overtly family friendly about the 2020 Toyota Land Cruiser, and to be fair, it’s not touted to be. But it does come with the … | offyonder.com |
| The Toyota Land Cruiser will Stop the Kids from Screaming … | The Toyota Land Cruiser is meant for a family on the go and it has so many features that everyone will fall in love with it. The V8 engine … | lifeinpumps.com |
| The New Toyota Land Cruiser Doesn’t Feel As Special … | It’s Good Off-Road, Not Amazing The new Toyota Land Cruiser is good off-road, but not great — putting it in the same category as the outgoing … | theautopian.com |
📹 6 Reasons You Will Hate 2024 Land Cruiser!
Why you will hate 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser – 6 big reasons why. Plus my analysis and responses to your Land Cruiser comments …
Are Cruisers Good For Long Trips?
Cruisers are primarily designed for short-distance rides, emphasizing style and power over long-term comfort. While they excel in city commutes and leisurely outings, they are usually unsuitable for extended journeys, especially cross-country trips, due to their heavy weight, upright seating posture, and inefficient gearing. This makes them less ideal for long rides, where comfort, speed, and handling are crucial. Despite their fuel economy making cruisers appealing for road trips, they generally don't cater to the ergonomic needs of prolonged travel.
For those considering a long-distance adventure on a cruiser, there are options that strike a balance between comfort and efficiency. Some cruisers have features that support longer rides, such as comfortable seats and the ability to carry luggage. However, they may still struggle compared to other motorcycle styles, like Adventurous bikes (ADVs), which tend to offer greater comfort over similar displacements.
While cruisers are versatile and can handle urban streets, riders should be cautious if planning extensive journeys. They excel in short, relaxed rides but may leave riders fatigued over longer distances. Various models exist that can offer improved touring characteristics, emphasizing that while cruisers can be capable of longer journeys, they may not provide the optimal experience without thoughtful consideration of their design limitations.
How Long Do Land Cruiser Engines Last?
Toyota Land Cruisers are celebrated for their remarkable durability and longevity, often outperforming other vehicles in terms of mileage. With proper maintenance, these vehicles can endure anywhere from 200, 000 to over 300, 000 miles (320, 000 kilometers), with diesel variants typically lasting even longer. Generally, gasoline-powered Land Cruisers last between 200, 000 and 250, 000 miles, while diesel models can achieve up to 300, 000 miles. Key factors such as the model year and regular maintenance practices significantly influence their longevity.
With diligent upkeep, a Land Cruiser can function efficiently for 15 to 20 years or more, sometimes even reaching 500, 000 miles before major repairs, such as engine or transmission rebuilds. Regular service is essential, as the engine is expected to last around 300, 000 miles, while the transmission is likely to reach 200, 000 miles. The rugged design of the Land Cruiser allows it to withstand severe usage, making it a popular choice among off-road enthusiasts.
Reports from owners indicate that many vehicles have exceeded 200, 000 to 300, 000 miles on the odometer, establishing the Toyota Land Cruiser's reputation as a long-lasting and reliable option for buyers. Ultimately, with a strong commitment to regular maintenance, the Lifespan of a Toyota Land Cruiser can be prolonged significantly.
Are Land Cruisers Dependable?
The Toyota Land Cruiser is renowned for its reliability, making it a popular choice among consumers. Many models can last for decades, with some still operational after 30 to 40 years. This dependability stems from Toyota's dedication to quality; however, not all model years exhibit the same standards. The Land Cruiser, especially the 100 series, is often regarded as one of the most dependable models, noted for its ease of maintenance and common parts availability, appealing to the average consumer.
Despite its durability, regular servicing is essential for optimal performance, as components like gaskets may not endure for the vehicle's full intended life of 25 years. The Land Cruiser's robust construction allows it to handle rigorous conditions and tasks, solidifying its reputation.
Recently, Toyota revamped the Land Cruiser for the 2024 model year, introducing a hybrid powertrain aimed at a broader audience while still maintaining off-road capabilities. While the Land Cruiser boasts an impressive reliability score of 83 out of 100, indicating good reliability, it remains important to keep up with regular maintenance routines to ensure longevity and performance. Overall, the Land Cruiser stands out as one of the most reliable vehicles ever manufactured, capable of providing decades of dedicated service.
Is It Worth Buying A High Mileage Land Cruiser?
The Toyota Land Cruiser is renowned for its durability, longevity, and low maintenance costs, making it a reliable option for high-mileage purchases. While the vehicle can exceed 200, 000 miles, the condition largely depends on previous owner care, as reported by Jalopnik. A Land Cruiser with 200, 000 miles isn't considered overly high mileage, but buyers should be cautious about maintenance and repair needs. Research is essential to understand the factors influencing pricing and reliability.
High-mileage models may require part replacements, especially in steering and suspension, particularly after 300, 000 miles. Users have shared experiences with both high-mileage and low-mileage models, indicating minimal differences in performance. While buying a high-mileage vehicle can be risky, the Land Cruiser’s reputation offers some peace of mind regarding reliability. It’s suggested that prospective buyers be prepared for potential upgrades and repairs, ensuring that any used Land Cruiser is well-maintained and priced fairly.
Overall, the 200 series is noted for its comfort and capability, with many enthusiasts believing it surpasses other Toyota SUVs in aesthetics and functionality. With proper upkeep, Land Cruisers can last significantly longer, making them a worthy consideration for buyers prioritizing reliability and performance.
Do Land Cruisers Hold Their Value?
Toyota Land Cruisers are known for their excellent value retention compared to many vehicles. The base model starts at approximately $85, 565, and despite a high cost, their reputation for durability and luxury contributes to strong resale value. After five years, a Land Cruiser typically depreciates by 39%, with a resale value of around $44, 791, illustrating its robust market position. Their well-built, tank-like construction makes them popular for off-road use, further enhancing their desirability.
Even high-mileage examples remain priced competitively against new crossovers. The longevity associated with Land Cruisers, capable of lasting 250, 000 miles or more, adds to their resale potential. While the initial depreciation for a new model can be steep—around $10, 000 annually for the first five years—many buyers still find value in used models. Although they may not be the most attractive SUVs, their reliability, durability, and off-road prowess make them a wise investment.
Overall, Toyota Land Cruisers hold their value exceptionally well, appealing to enthusiasts and practical buyers alike. Their consistently high resale values make them a noteworthy choice in the automotive market.
Is A Land Cruiser Comfortable To Drive?
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a remarkable off-road-oriented SUV that offers a surprisingly comfortable experience. While it features some truck-like characteristics, it maintains a well-composed ride, especially on rough terrain. The interior is notably quiet, providing a sense of calm even at highway speeds, making it suitable for daily driving without excessive wear on crucial components. It's particularly enjoyable in low-speed, technical situations, showcasing its agility.
On pavement, the Land Cruiser handles more like a car-based SUV compared to its previous models, thanks to engineering improvements. Fuel efficiency has improved significantly, with estimates of 22/25/23 mpg for city/highway/combined usage. Powered by a turbocharged 2. 4-liter I4 hybrid system, it delivers 326 hp and 465 lb-ft of torque, enhancing its driving dynamics compared to past models. The advanced suspension system absorbs road imperfections, delivering a stable ride, while the Multi-Terrain select control adapts to various conditions.
Although it lacks some modern tech features and has poor gas mileage, its comfortable seats, excellent driving position, and intuitive interior make it a standout for families and adventurous travelers.
Is A Land Cruiser High Maintenance?
Toyota Land Cruisers are recognized for their durability and reliability but have sophisticated technology that can lead to higher maintenance costs compared to smaller vehicles. Over the first 10 years, maintenance and repairs average approximately $6, 729, which is $1, 521 below the SUV industry average. There's a 16. 08% probability of a major repair during this period. To maximize longevity, adhering to a regular maintenance schedule is crucial, as a well-maintained Land Cruiser can last anywhere from 15 to over 20 years. The vehicle scores 83 out of 100 in reliability, though issues with clutches, brake pads, and timing belts may arise, highlighting the importance of routine service like oil changes and brake checks.
With average yearly maintenance costs ranging from $800 to $900, Land Cruisers may seem expensive to maintain initially, but this is comparable to their peers in the luxury SUV segment. High-mileage vehicles can often perform better with strong maintenance records. Proper upkeep can help Land Cruisers achieve 300, 000 miles or more, ensuring safety and satisfaction in driving while preventing costly repairs in the long run.
Why Is Toyota Getting Rid Of The Land Cruiser?
Toyota discontinued the Land Cruiser in certain markets, including North America, due to shifting consumer preferences, evolving regulatory requirements, and declining sales after 60 years of success. The iconic SUV faced diminishing interest and was considered too bloated and inefficient, with a price tag nearing $90, 000, which alienated many Toyota SUV enthusiasts. Ultimately, the company decided to focus on providing products that better align with demand, rather than catering to resale markets.
The Land Cruiser's departure from the U. S. lineup occurred after the 2021 model year, despite its continued popularity in other regions and among loyal fans. Toyota is still committed to the large SUV segment and is exploring future offerings that celebrate the brand's rich off-road legacy. After a brief hiatus, Toyota has announced the return of the Land Cruiser in 2024, built on the TNGA-F platform, which will be shared with the new Toyota 4Runner.
However, the legacy of the Land Cruiser remains bittersweet; it left the U. S. market amidst waning sales and stiff competition from luxury models such as the Audi Q8. While its discontinuation is a significant shift for off-road enthusiasts, Toyota aims to adapt and enhance its SUV lineup to meet evolving consumer needs going forward.
What Is The Life Expectancy Of A Land Cruiser?
The Toyota Land Cruiser is renowned for its durability and longevity, often surpassing 300, 000 miles with proper maintenance. Vehicles with 100, 000 to 200, 000 miles can still be deemed in good condition, contingent on care and upkeep. Typically, the Land Cruiser averages 250, 000 to 300, 000 miles, with instances reported of exceeding 400, 000 miles. The vehicle is designed for a minimum service life of 25 years, as stated by Toyota representatives.
Studies indicate the Land Cruiser has a potential lifespan of approximately 280, 236 miles, ranking it as one of the most reliable SUVs in its class. Regular maintenance is critical, and adherence to the manufacturer’s recommendations can significantly extend its life. On average, the lifespan is around 271, 000 miles, with many owners claiming easy surpassing of 200, 000 miles. Fuel type and driving habits also influence longevity.
In summary, the Toyota Land Cruiser is a capable vehicle that can last well beyond the average 150, 000 to 250, 000 miles of typical cars, and many users have experienced exceptional durability beyond 300, 000 miles with dedicated maintenance.
How Many Miles Do Cruisers Last?
With appropriate care, many Toyota FJ Cruisers have been documented to surpass 200, 000 miles, with numerous owners achieving over 300, 000 miles. The average lifespan of an FJ Cruiser is around 250, 000 miles, exceeding typical performance expectations for vehicles. Specific models from 2007-2008, often found with over 100, 000 miles, can still be reliable options when properly maintained. Reports indicate some FJ Cruisers may even reach 400, 000 miles, especially when routine maintenance and minor fixes are regularly addressed.
Factors influencing longevity include maintenance practices, driving habits, and environmental conditions. Regular upkeep like oil changes and servicing can significantly impact performance and lifespan.
While there are no guarantees, many owners express confidence in the durability of their FJ Cruisers based on their experiences; for example, one owner compared it with a previous 4Runner that lasted 260, 000 miles with diligent care. Overall, FJ Cruisers—if well-maintained—are expected to exceed 250, 000 miles comfortably, with proper care extending their life even further. Advanced maintenance is recommended to avoid rust and mechanical issues, especially in older models. In essence, the longevity of an FJ Cruiser hinges on how well it is looked after, making it a dependable vehicle choice for long-term use.
📹 Family car review: 2022 Toyota LandCruiser 300 Series
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 Series is a mammoth car, a big seven-seater 4×4 that is renowned for its off-road capability.
People aren’t upset about the change from V8 to 4 cylinder because they are worried about power. They are complaining about it because a boosted 4 cylinder with electric assist won’t last as long as the under stressed V8 or even the older sixes. You could buy an older Land Cruiser and pass it down to your kids.
I love the new LC. I think Toyota nailed it. The 200 series didn’t exactly sell like hot cakes. Why? Too expensive. Deplorable gas mileage. Useless 3rd row. And huuuge… (although not that much bigger than this one). Honestly, like you said, this slots perfectly above the 4Runner price wise. I personally hate leather seats, so I’m thrilled about the cloth seats on the 1958 edition. I have been waiting for the new 4Runner, but seeing how close they are priced, I may wait a bit more, wait for the guaranteed dealer markups to die down and just get an LC.
Jeff, My first concern is the placement of the spare tire. Just about every serious off road SUV you can name places the spare on the tailgate for ready access and that is not an option as it was on the last Prado. My second concern is the current absence of a 2 door model with manual transmission. For decades the mid-size (Prado) Land Cruiser offered these options.🤔
The only concerns I have is the dealership ADM. Why can’t you guys just do MSRP (Monroney) and not add an addendum sticker. These rigs will be modified as soon as they leave the lot. Therefore, I’m out and will find a 1958 several years down the road from a private party and pay cash. That’s what I did with my FJC TT, which is still my daily driver. Thanks Jeff!
I would have gone way smaller. If it was up to me, Length 186, width 72, height 66, wheelbase 108, ground clearance 10, weight 4,000 lbs, a 4 litre 340 horsepower inline six cylinder for simplicity and reliability. Dual injection, Solid axles so you never need a wheel alignment, swichable 2wd, 4wd high and low. Eight speed automatic. Mild hybrid option. Seats that adjust to fold fully flat. Headunit that is integrated into the dashboard not sticking up. A price point just under $50K. A wheel/tire package with real sidewalls and better ride quality like 275/60/18.
I think it looks amazing. The only SUV I think looks better is the new 70 series. If dealer mark ups aren’t criminal (below 10k) then I’ll buy. I don’t hate the 4banger but I am concerned about longevity of a high output 4 cylinder. Chevy went the extra mile and integrated diesel tech into their new 4banger for durability but Toyota hasn’t mentioned any details on their new engine. Time will tell.
Not getting the 2.8L diesel engine option. Also what is the price to replace those electric batteries? How long are they warrantied for? Past land cruisers are running strong 20 years later. In 10 years are 2024 Land Cruiser owners gonna be sticker shocked when the dealership say it’s gonna cost $15000 to replace the batteries for that 48ph electric motor? Those are two things I don’t like about it. Plus if the batteries are located in the floor under the cargo mat. If I or anyone wanted to put a Truck Vault or Cargo guide back their doesn’t look like a option.
I just bought a First Edition model right off the showroom floor. At first I was skeptical about the hybrid drivetrain. After driving it and getting great gas mileage and plenty of power, I’m sold on it. Toyota wrote the book on hybrids. The only complaint I have is the lack of front seat storage bins and cubby holes. A place to store sunglasses would be nice. I could do without that console cooler box and have just a big bin to hold my stuff. I don’t carry passengers or tow anything so I’m OK with that. The fit and finish is exceptional as I would expect with Toyota products. I love the driving position and visibility that the Cruiser offers me. She’s a “keeper”.
In Australia, that isn’t a Land Cruiser – it’s the smaller Prado. The Land Cruiser now has a V6 diesel (they dropped the V8 with the intro of the new 300 series). The 2.8 diesel in this new Prado is what we have had here for years in the HiLux ute. They are gutless and known for problems. While this new model is a huge improvement on the current Prado we have here, the engine choice is going to cost them a lot of sales.
This and the new Saquoia are Frankencars. It’s hard to comprehend how a new ground-up design can have the batteries simply suck in the back rising 5+ inches above the tailgate opening. It’s like the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing. I understand that integrating the batteries into the floor will take time but I’ll pass on these until they get that done.
Cloth seats don’t get scalding hot so you sweat constantly and they don’t get freezing cold so your bum goes numb. They also tend to hold up better than pleather. I think cloth seats are the best option because they’re breathable. I’m in the market for the new Sienna and if I could have those vintage Toyota cloth seats in there I’d be a happy man!
I am not sure why Toyota is presenting this as the “Land Cruiser” in the US. Around the world in the majority of countries, it is and has always been called the Land Cruiser Prado. Also known as the 250 Series. The previous fourth-generation Land Cruiser Prado was the 150 series. The Prado version of the Land Cruiser has always been smaller, less powerful, and at a lower price than the full-size Land Cruiser, which again this is not. Another interesting fact is that in other countries, you can buy this new Land Cruiser Prado with a petrol or a diesel engine, in other words non-hybrid, and with a third row. Lastly, the 200 Series you mentioned was the full-sized Land Cruiser that was in production from 2007-2020. The current generation of the full-size Land Cruiser is the 300 Series and has been in production since 2021-present. From a price perspective, a full-size Land Cruiser that is fully equipped with a turbo engine will cost the same or more than a Toyota Sequoia Capstone.
The fundamental data used in this article needs to be corrected. LC250 is not the “new LC200”!!! LC200 is now LC300. The old LC150 is the new LC250. In the Middle East and Australia, we have two Land Cruisers, the large full version and the small brother. The LC300 is large and comes with a 3.5 V6 Twin Turbo and 409HP or a trusty V6 4.0l naturally aspirated. The LC250, or Prado as it is known in some markets, comes with a 2.4l Turbo petrol 267 HP. In some markets, you have a diesel and hybrid version available.
If it will be available with a manual transmission and a naturally aspirated engine with decent power I would seriously consider it. I will not buy one if they are only available with a slushbox ! Lucky, my 2010 6 speed manual TRD Offroad Tacoma that got a new FREE frame in 2019 is still going strong and only has 130k miles on it.
Let’s be clear…the Land Cruiser is a vehicle that was NEVER supposed to have a third row. Ever. Some troop carrier configs sort of made sense for the Japanese military back in the day, but that is a whole different configuration. For civilian POV use, this is not primarily a soccer mom tike carrier or similar concrete jungle taxi of whatever sort. It CAN be used for that, but that isn’t the focus. That back end is meant for the utility of other gear…and that’s assuming you do not take out the second row for the same. 2 rows makes sense. 3 did NOT belong. There are other vehicles for people who need 3 rows.
I think that middles 50s price point is unrealistic. Toyota won’t make very many units and dealers will have insane markups on the few that they get. Also for the change from a V8 with reliability know to last several hundred thousands miles, there is so much more that can go wrong in a turbo, hybrid setup. There are many more parts involved. Maybe the new power train setup will turn out to be just as reliable as the V8s and Straight 6 models, but because of all of the extra parts involved, it is not as likely in my opinion. If it turns out that you really can purchase one in the mid 50s price range and the power train turns out to be incredibly reliable, then this is going to be an awesome vehicle.
Putting the iForce-Max (or the 4-cylinder dog of an engine if you don’t get the hybrid) power train in this truck pretty much made it DOA for me. The numbers Toyota are putting out for this drive train won’t be met in the real world and, if they are, will only apply to those going back and forth to Walmart. Considering all the problems Toyota has had with their iForce-Max lineup, the twitchy electronics, poor reliability, and lack of a manual transmission and transfer case, I wouldn’t take this thing across someone’s front lawn, much less off road anywhere. I come from a long line of die-hard Toyota fans (my parents literally won’t drive anything else), so I was excited when I first saw the new Land Cruiser design. It looks awesome!! Love the design!! But literally everything else about it is junk, IMO. It shows how Toyota has continued to ignore fans and produced yet another overpriced, cheap-plastic-clad mall crawler with dubious reliability. And $55K for a base model? Idiotic. Literally not worth the money…and that’s before the ridiculous dealer markups, tax, tags, registration, fees, etc. In the end, you’ll be lucky to get off the lot with your base model for less than $75K. Corporate greed at its finest. I know, I know, the cult of Toyota will adore it regardless because it has a Toyota badge on it, but I really wish Toyota would actually build something I’d love to drive, both on and off the road, instead of just building a dozen versions of the same minivan. And seriously, don’t bother quoting MPG numbers to people who’re looking at off-road rigs.
Its interesting as an Australian hearing the LC Prado (LC250 in the US) being compared to the LC200. Over here we have the Land Cruiser Prados which are like the little brothers of the Land Cruiser 200s and 300s, and this is the new Prado… So for us it makes total sense that it isnt as big and is a 4cyl, but i can totally see why many US buyers would be very confused lol.
Personally I love the new Land cruiser. I really like the linear performance of the hybrid with better fuel economy. Who wouldn’t want 65 foot pounds more and better fuel economy? Really think about that? I like the size the size I think is perfect I think they brought it back to where it should be I think it’s going to be much more trail-worthy at this size then the previous. I really do like the 1958 from the standpoint of personalizing it to your taste. Put my own tires and wheels and everything on it set it up exactly the way I want it for the same price as the higher price Land cruiser. I will have to see the cloth seats in person I had a 4Runner years ago that was cloth interior And it was great It was a really durable interior. As for the tow rating my personal opinion is if you need more than 6,000 lb towing you should be buying a full size truck not a medium size SUV. So in my opinion Toyota hit a home run. Now I’m trying to convince my wife that she needs a Land cruiser because I’m not giving up my Tacoma . But I would love to have both. Thank you 👍
My LX570 weighs 5800 lbs and I can see the benefits of the next generation going on a 1500 lbs diet would help the environment. I remember as a child when GM cut the weight of its full size models such as the Caprice from 4,800 lbs to 4,200 lbs was a big deal. 600 lbs lighter. Other manufacturers followed suit. Then base engines went from 5.7 litres to 5.0 litres. With improvements to transmission, fuel efficiency went from 13/18 to 17/24 which was remarkable from 1975 to 1976.
That’s not a real Land Cruiser, it’s a 4-runner with a four banger, it’s made by Toyota but it won’t last like a real one. We have a 200 series and I’m willing to bet that the 2024 will have more troubles than ours will over the next 300,000 miles. I’m glad to see that it has a body on frame and not a uniboby but the rest is sad.
What a lot of people don’t understand and are making incorrect comparisons. This is the US first LC Prado. The full 300 series we don’t get, this is the “little” brother. Like the Lexus GX current and past. This is the first “base” Prado available in the states and I’m stoked. This is exactly what I wanted, going from my GX460.
I just bought my wife the First Edition yesterday and the only negative is that there isn’t any storage space for the front row. The glove box is small as it’s a refrigerator for drinks. There aren’t any other cubbies available for storage anywhere else on the center console so we’re putting stuff that would go there in the glove box. Other than that, it’s an AMAZING vehicle!
While I love Land Cruisers and have had 4 over the years plus other Toyota products like the FJ Cruiser, I always felt Toyota kept pushing it too much upmarket. I was happy to hear the new approach to this new Cruiser. I love the look but after a few months now to really chew it over…. It comes down to this for me….. the 4Runner is Prado with a different body like the GX, the new US market Land Cruiser is a Prado. Why would I want to go with a considerably more expensive version of the Prado, obviously it’s a new version of the platform, but it has a new, unproven drivetrain that will require more cost to maintain by the 150,000 mark, not including the likely battery replacement around 12-15 years…. Or have the refined and perfected 4.0 V6 and proven drivetrain if the 5th gen which can give me a 3rd row? The 4Runner 3rd row is perfectly fine for kids and as a family of 5 while I was initially thinking about the new cruiser, we decided to go with the 5th gen 4Runner. Not as fancy or cutting edge, won’t be nearly as sexy or trendy as the new Cruiser but as a vehicle I want to use for 20 years, it’s the only choice. I am struggling to see how they are going to reposition the next 4Runner. But since they are both Prado’s I just see it as the better buy and I expect it will go anywhere the new cruiser will. 🤷
I can’t see myself hating it for any of those reasons. I’ve been waiting for a reasonably priced SUV that isn’t compromised by a 3rd row I would NEVER need (also that isn’t a squinty-face Lexus or Land Rover Defender) that has decent offroad ability, will let me toss golf clubs in the back, take mountain bikes out and generally be something I can keep for a long time. I only do 5k miles a year now so this could be another 15 year vehicle for me.
I’m ok with cloth as long as they are easy to clean and don’t show dirt, being an off road vehicle. Also would like rubber flooring instead of carpet. I have 2 kids and 2 very large long haired dogs. I would like something like this so my dogs can have a/c in the summer. Right now I have a bare bones 2019 tacoma with a soft topper and rubber bed mat for the dogs, but it does get hot for them. Having carpet and cloth seats, it really does attract the dog hair, even if they aren’t in the cab. As far as the other complaints, it’s really a non issue for me. It may not be for everyone, but I think for the segment it is going after, especially the price point, it’s should sell really well. As long as dealers don’t get greedy.
2:46 I am sorry that I just do not agree with the saying “this is the way to go”- more specifically 4 cyl. engine to replace 8 cyl with Turbo is not the way to go. The upfront may look great when the truck is new. It WILL BE very ugly when it is getting old. upfront glory to trade off the reliability is never the way to go.
I don’t fit 6’5″ 230. Right knee area smashed between the steering wheel and center console on the Land Cruiser. I can’t believe how wide the center console is. Totally ridiculous for the US market where people are taller. I had no choice but to buy a new 4Runner over the Land Cruiser because it has so much more between the stearing wheel and center console.
This article is obviously clickbait. I will only buy a vehicle with cloth seats, no sun roof, level beltline, level roofline, boxy upright ans spacious cabin, upright A, B and C pillars, with clear visibility, generous cargo area and good ground clearance. This vehicle has all those features I love and will pay for. My main concern is the NMH battery longevity, maintenance and replacement cost.
If you’re worried about fuel economy get a Sienna or Highlander. These are SUVs, heavy for many reasons. “We want MPG, let’s boost a smaller motor.” If it’s by turbo, a 4 liter diesel. If it’s petrol, 4 liter hybrid (plug in of course). I’d rather have 4 electric motors running my 6-7 thousand pound truck than an over boosted 2 liter 4 cylinder. My work vehicle went from a V8 to a turbo 6, petrol. I fuel up 2x as much now. Paper vs practical
This article didn’t address the #1 reason a lot of people won’t buy one – the fact that a ton of driver-assist crap and the hybrid engine are STANDARD. Why would I want to go offroading or drive on the beach in this thing when I could just pick up a 4-runner or a Jeep and accomplish the same thing without a bunch of electronic points of failure? How is this going to hold up vs the elements when you make all of this extra tech stuff mandatory and it creates a slew of potential issues? If it was a manual transmission with optional tech package I’d be interested (especially at the price). But with no escape from a hybrid engine and robodriving crap add-ons, this is basically a hipster Highlander. No thanks.
Well, this is a Prado, a different vehicle to the LC200 that was sold in the USA. Comparing this to the previous LandCruiser is like comparing the newest Explorer to the previous model Expedition, they are just different vehicles, different sizes and built to different specs. In other countries where the Prado is sold alongside the 300, the already pricey Prado far outsells the 300 which is just so much more expensive ….
1) Because it’s a completely different vehicle, and they have to meet government efficiency and emissions regs 2) if people want a huge off road SUV, buy a Sequoia TRD 3) same as #2, or (gulp) MAYBE get over yourself and buy a van. 4) No, 4Runner will move down market, and compete with Wrangler Bronco 5) get a Sequoia/ Tundra 6) Agreed. Softex would be nice for that $$.
Disgrace that LC has taken itself out of its class of luxury off road SUV (cloth – 8″ nav screen😮…) for 55+K 😣 The prices are going up for less and less quality. Why are people stupid enough to pay for it. I’ll spend more & take the New Lexus GX 550 (redesign of the GX 460) Now that’s a tough looking machine 🩷 with bells, whistles, off road capabilities, and luxury
I’m very disappointed in Toyota, they ruined such a great car the Toyota Land Cruiser, and my country means more than a car that truck is used for military purposes. It was such a good reliable truck now I think Toyota is really falling off after the they’re leaving the V6 and their V8 they’re gone with the turbos and electric batteries, no matter what anybody says there’s nothing better than a V8 old Toyota I’m 21 years old and I believe in the older it is the better it is because all this new technology all is gonna get you doing is going back to the dealership, more and more for servicebecause the common mechanic cannot work on a battery
The old Prado used to come in V6 (270 horse power, 380 Nm) and V4 (165 horse power, 246 Nm). Now coming in V4 turbo delivering 326 horse power, 630 Nm torque! with better fuel economy and way better look. I’d say sign me in! This not the heavy LC300, so don’t say it’s going from v8 to v4, get your facts right. The LC300 2024 is still going to the middle east with V6 twin turbo that delivers more than 400 horse power. this is smaller SUV that used to be 270 HP and now it’s +300 HP.
I don’t like leather seats (or the fake leather plastic stuff) so I dig the cloth in the 1958 personally. And a multi media touch screen is NOT going to be a reason I’m going to buy, or not buy a vehicle. What’s with that?! “I don’t like it, it doesn’t have Apple Car Play.” … “Ummm, did you look at anything else about the vehicle!?” Pretty stupid to me. Pretty soon they’ll have 40″ and then everyone will be satisfied. I don’t even pay attention to that, don’t even waste the time pointing it out. Definately not going to be a deal breaker … Made that’s cuz I’m from a different generation.
CHEERING NO THIRD ROW !!! As a single traveler, that DOES NOT WANT a third row, traveling alone, I am tired of every full size SUV having a row of entirely useless seats. In 10 years. NO-ONE ever sat in the rear seats of my FJ Cruiser ! How do I tow 6,000 pounds without 3 rows ? Land Cruiser is how (or 1 version of the Expedition I think). But – towing an Aistream trailer, you need at least 6,000 for a 23 footer.
Since nobody from corporate Toyota is reaching out to me to review it, I have no vested interest and will state my true opinion. I think they should have just called it the New PRADO like the rest of the world is doing. This is not a real Landcruiser. The 300 series is, even the LX600 is closer. But if Toyota really wants to get me to buy, send us the new 70 series that they debut in Australia for 2024. That’s a real Landcruiser. Solid axles, F&R lockers, Turbo Diesel, Optional Manual Trans. This looks like a direct product to take on the new Bronco (which I’m equally unimpressed with). This vehicle completely is the right vehicle to take the place of the 4Runner, but not the Landcruiser. It’s ok, go ahead and prove me wrong, it’s not a real Landcruiser- It’s a PRADO. Not that I wouldn’t mind at least doing an honest Offroad review of it, and have my mind changed. I’ll wait for that phone call.
Amazing vehicle, 4 Runner too. I can get wherever I need off road in my F150 with lockers, except of course jeep trails. Can tow well over 8000lbs too. Only role I see for this for me is as a mall crawler like 99% of people who buy them. Can’t justify the price tag for that. Will enjoy seeing how serious off readers modify these things down the road, though.
Very smart. Great off road, but not as good as the lifted 4Runner. Get the 4Runner if you want that. Great towing, but doesn’t compete with the larger Sequoia with 3 rows. Get the Sequoia if you want 3 rows and better towing. Great addition to Toyota that doesn’t compete with other Toyotas and will likely be loved by aficionados.
The old LC had a straight 6 for decades that produced 155 HP, and that was the best engine for the LC. The new LC has double the HP and people complain???? Also, it seems to me that the importance of the 3rd row is a marketing creation. NOBODY cared about third row 20 years ago, it was an irrelevant option. No power rear window is my only complaint.
I bought a 23 Tundra Limited one year ago, just bought my wife a 24 Land Cruiser 1958, I really can’t come up with many complaints, other than the stupid price tag of new vehicles in general, on the positive side, I keep my vehicles for 10-12 years, and Toyotas hold up well,,, Don’t try that with a Chevy, Ford, or Dodge.
You do realise this is the new Prado? The 300 series is the upgrade of the 200 series. This 250 was always meant to be a mid-size SUV and the step down from the largest Land Cruiser. Unfortunately you guys don’t get the 300 series (a really unfortunate decision by Toyota). Having said that, we (in Australia) haven’t had the 4Runner since the 80s and never got the Tacoma. We’re hoping that the new Hilux takes on the Tacoma platform and is just rebadged. 🤞
I think it looks cool. Way better than the outgoing Land Cruiser. I also like that it’s smaller. The outgoing one was ridiculously overpriced. Although cheaper, this one still seems a little overpriced. 55 G for the most basic trim. Then you’re going to have dealer markups on that. They still need to come up with a more affordable off roader.
People need to understand Landcruisers are not supposed to be luxury cars. The original LCs were work horses that you could drive anywhere and they held together through the worst beating. I know, drop it off a cliff or roll its many times and all you need is some body work. Vinyl seats and jump seats worked great. Toyota needs to get the LC back to basics and stop this over priced luxury BS. This should not be a car you load the kids, baby and dog into and go rock climbing in while you drink your herbal teas and the kids watch the movie in their seat. There are plenty of overpriced cars like that already.
1. I don’t think most people are objecting to the HP/TQ numbers, its more about the trend of boosting small engines which reduces the life expectancy of the engine. Toyota can claim anything but the history of boosted 4 cycl engines is worse than larger engines. 2. I personally get annoyed with spoiled people. Personally, take away the touch screen, put plastic instead of carpet, eliminate all the excess garbage and sell me a 1958 for under $50,000. It’s an off-road vehicle!
How come you’re not talking about the fact that Toyota is having major problems with engines turbocharged versions tundra in particular. That’s the article you should make so people are aware of it so they don’t fall into a trap In my opinion it’s complete ridiculousness that Toyota could not put an engine together with quality anymore. Tundras are not selling there’s too many of them they’re overpriced and in my opinion people don’t want them because they’re not reliable.
There is something everybody needs to understand this is not the real so-called “Land Cruiser”, this is the PRADO. The real TWIN TURBO V6 Land Cruiser 300 is almost sold everywhere else except North America. This PRADO did not REPLACE the LC300. Its just not sold in the US anymore. And yes I do know its not called the Prado in North America. Its called Prado everywhere else.
This doesn’t make sense to me, You have a 4runner 4 cylinder for under 55k and you have a land cruiser for 65k same engine. I would go with the 4runner which has the same engine, horsepower, and price cheaper. Who is going to buy the expensive one and the same horsepower and price? smh. If Toyota put the V6 engine to the Land Cruiser and prices mid 55k to 70 and the 4runner with the 4 cylinder for under 5kk then it makes sense. I don’t think Toyota is thinking right.
The negative comments have little merit. Technology will always change and hopefully advance enough positively to make things better. Move with modern day technologies and deal with it. You probably will find out it doesn’t suck after all. Otherwise we’d still be riding mules, horses and out dated transportation here in America.
Since when did you buy an LC for fuel efficiency? It’s clear that it’s a car built during the pandemic period and an economic crisis. Would I trade in my V6 for a turbo four pot hybrid? No way, all the more so if I owned a current gen GX460. So Sequoia > Land Cruiser?? They should have incorporated the twin turbo V6 diesel fitted on the LC300 rather than this four pot.
Its been proven that turbo engines don’t last as long as natural aspirated ones. The old landcruiser was built to last and easy to fix thats why UN uses them for natural disasters/war zones. Imagine trying to work on a hybrid turbo motor the costs alone are through the roof. But i get it,its all about EPA and the average consumer. Its just everything that the old landcruiser isn’t. It screams ford bronco sport to me . Everyone thinks they are driving a bronco but in reality you aren’t. I guess im just sour and still can’t afford the old ones. I hope people get what they want out of them when buying it.
I love it. Yeah it’s meant to be more of a utility vehicle than a pure off-roader. I’m ok with the spare location, the limited clearance probably is wide and enthusiasts can lift it. I’m actually ok with the engine, it has no EGR which Toyota learned from fouling up even Prius’s. They’ve been doing hybrid for 20 years and they’re reliable and give a sweet torque boost, and the mileage is hitherto unheard of in a vehicle of this size. My main concern is that with dealer markups, you’re in Defender pricing territory, and Defenders are legit capable, legit luxurious, and the new ones have actually dodged Land Rover’s historic liability concerns (they’re built in the same Slovak factory as Porsche Cayennes). So unless you’re truly a Toyota badge lover, or particularly love hybrids, the Land Rover is… get this… actually the better value buy.
There is not a SNOWBALL chance in ______ that a turbo 4 can hold a candle to the 4.7 in my 300,000 mile tundra. Keep selling the snake oil and pig perfume to the ” look at that nav screen wiz bag gadgets” boys. It is the fact that the four banger has to work twice as hard, put twice as much force and make so much more heat to pull less than the outgoing model. It is physics. The workload on the battery at full tow weight is going to kill it in 7 to 8 years. This is no prius. It is cheaper because they know it is disposable.
Land Cruiser 250 (known as LC Prado) is not an upgrade of LC 200. LC 300 is the successor of LC 200 and Toyota went from V 8 to V6. LC 250 is not direct competitor to LC 200. LC 250 is the successor of LC 150 known as LC Prado / in US Lexus GX. You compare apples to oranges rather apples to apples. I would suggest you do another article and correct those wrong comparisons.
Really it is a disappointment. There are too many compromises to get in on the same frame as so many other toyotas. The rear lift to get things in the hatch is truly rediculous, the approach and departure angles are not great, what’s with that cover over the hitch. I will admit it looks great from the outside and the interior is mainly OK. It has some off-road capability, but really this is now a city grocery hauler with more off-road capbility than most SUVs, but is no longer what it once was.
“It’ll last 20 years!” Is pretty much invalid because almost no one keeps their cars that long. If you’re buying a brand new vehicle expecting to keep it for 20 years, then you should’ve bought a fully depreciated 5 yr-old car and keep it 15 years, instead of eating the depreciation like a moron. Also if you’re driving a V8 gas hog for 20 years, the wasted gas money would’ve been enough to buy a whole new vehicle. I sincerely doubt anyone is putting 10k miles per year of offroading and rock climbing to justify the 13MPG city driving (best case scenario).
Considering. However, I will never buy until I see real world mpg. I still have my 18 Tundra because the new Tundra V6 Turbo Hybrid only get 1 mpg better in the real world. Second, I love that the new LandCruiser offers Clothe Seats!!! I only wish I could get clothe on the upgraded packages. Nevertheless, clothe is a million times better than so many mfgs using “Vegan, MB Tech, etc.” also all known as PLASTIC seating surfaces.
I was surprised Toyota went with cloth seats too. Well… that type of cloth. I assumed they would have went with vinyl floors and vinyl seats. Reality is… it doesn’t matter. Most people are going to rip out the back seats anyway and put down a plate system to support a drawer system. The front seats coves will probably go over.
This is the H3 version of the land cruiser. It’s a cheaper, dumbed down version of a once solid product. They are using name recognition to sell this to people who don’t know any better. I expected better from Toyota, but I guess this is the way things are done now. Hard pass for me, this is nothing but an overpriced 4Runner.
This new ‘Land Cruiser’ is symptomatic of all new vehicles: too many electronics, too expensive, no longevity, and complexity that defies belief. I will NEVER buy any new Toyota truck or car again. I have owned a 1996 80 Series, a 2003 100 Series, a 2006 100 Series, and a 2008 200 Series Land Cruisers. With the exception of the 200 Series, all of these trucks were made to last forever by simple maintenance. The 200 Series cost of maintenance skyrocketed compared to the earlier models, but still an amazing truck. The new 2024 model seen here is simply disgusting. Since I no longer car camp in remote off-road sections of CO, AZ, or UT, there is no need for a Land Cruiser. Based upon the new vehicles being made today, my 2011 Tundra will stay in my garage until taking my last breath. Thank you Toyota for building the best and most reliable vehicles, so sorry you were forced to build the complete junk seen in this article.
I just need one reason not to get this and keep my 2011 Sequoia, overpriced. Toyota managed to ruin one of their best cars ever built, if downsizing it wasn’t enough, the 4 cylinder words should not ever be together in the same sentence, associated with the legendary LC lineage. Toyota messed up big on this one with the rest of their trucks lately
Jeep & Ford stand testimony to over 70 years of use by The United Nations, as it’s four wheel platform of choice in over three hundred and ninety one conflict zones spread over from Niger and Sierra Leone to Bosnia, Afghanistan, Kosovo and Kashmir in the Himalayas & Hindukush Range to the sun-kissed beaches of Africa and Somalia. If only Americans knew of the proud heritage of Ford and Jeep, would they be able to appreciate the criticality of having an automatic push-button tail door opening and closing button, which decides whether an american will buy a jeep (sorry, they are called trucks in America)… (wait! if they are called trucks, what are commercial cargo hauling vehicles called in America?). Its only fair and wise that Toyota offers 17 different trims over 6 different platforms like the Tacoma, fore runner and Land Cruiser etc to try to convince and entice Americans to jump behind the wheel of one, and hop continents. Who are they kidding? poor Japanese bastards, i feel sorry for them. It’s like my cousin from Akaido offering me a choice from amongst his seven sisters, hoping I’ll in-breed with one.