Black Lives Matter (BLM) has removed a page on its website that condemned America’s “Western-prescribed nuclear family structure”, prompting a former NFL lineman to blast critics who accused him of it. The organization states that they disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and that there is no reasonable basis to claim that the group’s website is promoting an actual reduction in the proportion of people actually living in a Western nuclear family structure.
BLM’s assertion that the nuclear family is “Western-prescribed” is misleading at best. The nuclear family is defined as two parents and their children, and this structure has existed throughout history. In September, media outlets first reported that the official Black Lives Matter website no longer included language encouraging the “disruption” of the “Western-prescribed nuclear family”. The organization also calls for family-friendly spaces and equal rights for mothers.
BLM has essentially said the nuclear family is untenable and that extended families provide the necessary support to take care of themselves. However, supporters of the movement note that BLM never said anything about abolishing the nuclear family. One of the deleted lines family, saying: “We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages'”, is a Marxist paradigm.
The main goals of BLM are anti nuclear family because they favor the community coming together over individualism. Upvote Turner published a YouTube video that states that BLM has a desire to “disrupt the nuclear family structure”. Turner criticized the organization for not caring even less about the nuclear family structure and for not addressing the issue of Black on Black crime under the shield of a badge.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| Does Black Lives Matter aim to destroy the nuclear family? | Black Lives Matter has essentially said the nuclear family is untenable and that extended families provide the necessary support to take care … | politifact.com |
| Black Families Matter | “We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that … | heritage.org |
| BLM site removes page on ‘nuclear family structure’ amid … | Black Lives Matter scrubbed a page on its website this week that disparaged the “Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.” | nypost.com |
📹 Here are the STATISTICS: ‘Black Lives Matter’ attack on the nuclear family is DANGEROUS
One of the most dangerous targets in the current crosshairs of Black Lives Matter is the nuclear family. Just like Karl Marx, BLM …
Who Does The Nuclear Family Benefit?
The nuclear family, composed of two adults and their recognized children, has both advantages and disadvantages. Key benefits include enhanced financial stability, the formation of robust support systems for children, and improved consistency in child-rearing due to established routines. This family structure fosters intimacy and reduces conflict, providing a secure environment for child development. Additionally, it allows parents, particularly women, greater autonomy in parenting without external interference from extended family.
However, the nuclear family is not without challenges. One significant drawback is the potential for increased childcare costs if both parents are employed, which can strain financial resources. Furthermore, while the nuclear family is often seen as the ideal model in industrial societies, critics note that the traditional portrayal of this family—consisting of a heterosexual couple with biological children—does not reflect the diversity of modern family structures.
Functionalist theorists, including George Murdock, argue that the nuclear family fulfills essential societal functions—sexual, reproductive, economic, and educational—that contribute to societal stability. Despite its advantages, the success of the nuclear family heavily depends on the quality of the marital relationship, emphasizing the need for strong partnerships. In conclusion, while the nuclear family can provide emotional support and financial security, it also presents challenges related to cost and societal expectations.
Who Comes Under Nuclear Family?
A nuclear family, also known as an elementary, atomic, or conjugal family, consists of parents and their children living together in a single home. This structure stands in contrast to single-parent families, extended families, or those with multiple parents. In sociology and anthropology, a nuclear family is considered a core unit, typically comprising two parents and dependent children. The term "nuclear" has historical significance, deriving from earlier meanings related to "kernel." Sociologist Bronisław Malinowski originally defined it as an isolated unit based on blood or marriage ties.
Functionalist sociologists, including Talcott Parsons, regard the nuclear family as a fundamental building block of society, performing essential societal functions. Traditionally, it includes a married couple, usually one male and one female, and their biological or adopted children—all residing together. This ideal family structure has been associated with stability and was the dominant arrangement in English society since the thirteenth century.
However, shifts in family dynamics occurred in the latter half of the twentieth century. Despite its straightforward definition as parents and children cohabiting, the concept encompasses more nuanced variations, adapting to cultural contexts, as seen in regions like Vietnam and among Singapore's Chinese community.
Who Agrees With The Nuclear Family?
Functionalists acknowledge the nuclear family as the primary family type but accept family diversity. The traditional nuclear family, typically comprising a working father, a homemaking mother, and their dependent children, is perceived to be in decline. This family structure, regarded by functionalists as a basic universal form, originates from modern Europe. As societal norms shift, the nuclear family model appears more as a specialized option rather than the foundational family unit in contemporary America.
Key theorists like George Murdock highlight that the nuclear family serves four essential societal functions: sexual, reproductive, educational, and economic. In recent decades, American family dynamics have transformed significantly, embracing various forms beyond the nuclear model. Family life is now more diverse, influenced by ideals of self-realization. Critics suggest that while two-parent families have advantages, detachment and isolation also present challenges.
The definition of a nuclear family encompasses a married couple and their children living together, yet interpretations vary. Some argue that the nuclear family has become problematic, advocating for "forged families" made up of self-selected individuals instead of biological connections. Ultimately, the evolution of the family reflects changing societal values, leading to an exploration of single-parent, blended, and same-sex families alongside traditional structures.
What Are The Issues Of BLM?
The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has actively challenged racism through political actions, letter-writing campaigns, and nonviolent protests, primarily addressing police brutality, over-policing of minority neighborhoods, and the issues tied to for-profit jails. A 2023 Center survey indicates that 51% of U. S. adults support BLM, with notable differences in opinion by race. Despite a recent decline in support, 32% believe the movement effectively raises awareness of racism against Black individuals.
Initiated as a hashtag in 2013, BLM has grown to encompass broader issues, including those affecting Black women, LGBTQ+ communities, and undocumented individuals. Following incidents like George Floyd's murder in May 2020, the movement gained significant traction, prompting major changes across multiple sectors, including policing and education, though challenges remain.
BLM emphasizes that Black lives deserve equal protection under the Constitution, which was momentarily supported by a national majority. It highlights systemic disadvantages faced by Black people in employment, healthcare, and education. Social media platforms, particularly Twitter, contribute to the movement's ongoing dialogue on racism, showcasing the increasing visibility of these issues. Overall, BLM seeks not only to address police violence and discrimination but also to advocate for equality in various aspects of life, facilitating conversations around institutional injustices and racial equity.
What Are The Criticism Of BLM?
Critics argue that the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement encourages violence against law enforcement, prompting the establishment of Blue Lives Matter groups as a counter. The cultural discourse surrounding BLM has been extensive, encompassing debates over ideological beliefs, protests, and how donations are utilized. However, critics often overlook the primary purpose of BLM. This movement, predominantly composed of young Black individuals and supported by various allies, raises crucial questions about the socioeconomic and political conditions necessary for Black lives to matter.
Advocates emphasize BLM’s role in forwarding racial justice, while opponents contend that it has not fulfilled the legacy of civil rights movements. Originating from the frustrations related to police brutality and systemic racial discrimination, the BLM hashtag gained traction in the U. S., leading to an international movement that sought to address various injustices. Nevertheless, skepticism persists regarding the movement's tactics, organizational structure, and engagement with political powers.
Additionally, some critics accuse BLM of lacking clear demands, which, they argue, detracts from its effectiveness. Despite these challenges, BLM continues to strive for significant changes while facing resistance that could impede anti-racist progress. The movement's focus is directed at systemic issues rather than individual actions, asserting that the goal is to rectify the brutalities inflicted by policing systems.
What Is The BLM Political Group?
Black Lives Matter (BLM) is a decentralized social and political movement focusing on highlighting racism, discrimination, and inequality faced by black individuals, particularly concerning police brutality and racially motivated violence. Established in 2013 following the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin case, BLM has sparked a significant national conversation regarding race and justice.
The movement advocates for independent black political power, self-determination, and accountability for law enforcement in cases of violence against African Americans. Scholars have recognized BLM as potentially the largest civil rights movement in U. S. history, with local chapters emerging nationwide to address systemic injustices.
BLM emphasizes both political and cultural struggles, urging supporters to adopt disruptive tactics to effect change. The co-founders, Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi, aimed to create a Black-centered political initiative, leading to a broad moral collective of activists advocating for rights and justice. The movement seeks a future free from punitive systems like police and prisons while investing in cultural and community healing.
As BLM continues to evolve, discussions surrounding its impact on American radicalism and the potential for social transformation remain ongoing, highlighting the foundational goals of addressing deeply rooted societal inequalities.
What Does Black Lives Matter Support?
The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement seeks to address systemic racism and promote social justice by advocating for essential rights such as food, education, housing, healthcare, clean water, and air for Black communities. Since its formation in 2013 in response to police brutality against Black individuals, BLM has united supporters around its core message. Recent surveys indicate that support for BLM among U. S. adults has declined from 67% in June 2020 to 51% currently, with a drop in the number of individuals expressing strong support.
Many Black Lives Matter activists have recently expanded their advocacy to include pro-Palestinian causes and other social issues, such as LGBTQ rights and immigration reform. While over 80% of Democrats support the movement, support among Republicans is significantly lower. BLM has also influenced professional sports, with leagues like the NHL, MLB, NBA, and WNBA promoting awareness through protests and educational initiatives. The movement emphasizes the need for equity, aiming to redefine the concept of the common good by focusing on marginalized communities.
Today, BLM is described as a chapter-based organization dedicated to validating Black lives and addressing broader societal injustices, positioning itself as a pivotal force in discussions regarding racial equality, economic justice, and dismantling institutional oppression.
Who Is Responsible For Nuclear Family?
The nuclear family, a prevalent structure in the 20th century, typically comprises two parents (a father and a mother) and their children living together. Traditionally, the father is viewed as the head of the household, tasked with providing financial support, while the mother manages the home and raises the children. They share the responsibility for the well-being of their family, offering emotional, physical, and financial support during their children's development.
This family model emphasizes partnership and parenthood, often involving married couples, although variations, such as cohabitation, are recognized. The nuclear family is distinguished from extended families, encompassing only the immediate family unit. Functionalist sociologist Talcott Parsons argued that nuclear families perform critical societal functions, including child socialization and emotional support. The notion of the nuclear family has been widely accepted as the 'traditional' structure, influencing societal expectations, yet the diversity and flexibility of family forms continue to evolve.
Matrilineal societies, for example, highlight alternate caregiving roles, demonstrating that the nuclear family concept is culturally specific and subject to historical change. Despite its longstanding dominance, the nuclear family's definition and relevance are increasingly adaptable in modern contexts, reflecting broader societal transformations.
Who Is Not Included In The Nuclear Family?
A nuclear family typically consists of a married couple with their dependent children living together in a single household, excluding extended family members like grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. The transition from extended families to nuclear families was influenced by economic changes. In sociological terms, a nuclear family includes two parents (traditionally a male and female) and their biological or adopted children. This structure has evolved to include same-sex couples raising children, expanding the definition of what constitutes a nuclear family.
Extended families, on the other hand, encompass relatives beyond the immediate family unit. While traditionally, the nuclear family was seen as the most common structure in many societies, recent research indicates that 82. 2% of American households deviate from this model. Many households may include extended family due to economic necessity, but a nuclear family remains distinctly defined as only the parents and children residing together.
Importantly, members such as cousins do not fall within the definition of a nuclear family, which simplifies the understanding of familial relationships by clearly outlining who is included. Overall, the nuclear family is perceived as a universal family structure, albeit a shifting concept in contemporary society.
Is Black Lives Matter Still A Thing?
The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, initiated in 2013 by Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi, is characterized as a decentralized network with around 40 chapters in the U. S. and Canada as of 2021. Despite the movement's vigorous efforts, polls indicate a gradual decline in overall public support, with recent data from Pew Research revealing a drop from 67% in June 2020 to 51%. BLM was significantly revitalized after George Floyd's murder in 2020, prompting nationwide calls for racial justice and garnering attention from various sports leagues.
Nevertheless, support has waned since then, prompting questions about the movement's future and its ability to regain legitimacy. While specific organizations exist under the BLM banner, such as the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, internal struggles persist. The movement advocates for the systemic elimination of disadvantages faced by Black individuals in areas like employment, healthcare, and education. The founders have distanced themselves from the leadership of the Global Network Foundation, raising concerns about the direction of the movement.
Despite the challenges faced, BLM envisions a world where Black individuals not only survive but thrive, fighting against the structures that perpetuate racial inequality. The impact of the movement remains significant, but its declining support signals a challenging road ahead in the quest for racial justice.
📹 BLM week in schools to ‘celebrate globalism’ and discuss disruption of nuclear family
Washingtonexaminer #blacklivesmatter #school Public schools across the country are beginning Black History Month with Black …
I’m a single mom and I was on govt assistance at the beginning of Trump’s presidency. Then I got a promotion and got off all govt programs, I support my kids on my own. It is possible, if I can do it (with no college degree) anybody can. This is the best country in the world, we cannot let them ruin it.
This is 💯% true, not just black families, my eldest I raised the first part of his life without his father, he was in & out of the system, psychiatric issues, drug abuse. My youngest I had after I was married, she was well adjusted and happy, did exceptional in school, etc. Fortunately by the time my son reached his 30’s he turned his life around, and is doing very well. My daughter excels in the work force, and has two college degrees that she paid her way through with scholarships and work.
This is exactly what I’ve been saying for quite a while. My family is white and I saw the destructiveness of welfare first hand with them and their friends. You get more of what you reward/subsidize! What you didn’t mention is that the welfare system encourages deception and fraud. It’s not quite enough to get all that they want so they work under the table. They also don’t report live in boyfriends. This keeps them from the one source that will really help them; God and the church. Essentially the gov’t becomes their provider and their god. That leads them down a very immoral path. It’s a horrible shame!
My deadbeat dad left me, my mom and sister when I was really young. I technically grew up in a fatherless home but my sister and I had a strong father figure in our best friends’ dad and our uncle. If it wasn’t for them stepping up when our father left, we probably wouldn’t have become successful as adults. Also, my family and I are white and our best friends and their dad who was one of our strong father figures are black.
So true. The system should be set up to help only when in desperate need. Example I have a friend that her husband was in a motorcycle accident and was out of work for awhile to recovery. She only made enough to barely cover the bills. So she went to welfare office and explained her situation and asked for help with just food. They denied her and they lost their house 3 months later to foreclosure. I was infuriated! This is unacceptable and she deserved the help she needed to keep her family going in her time of need till he recovered. That was 15 years ago and when she tells that story you can still feel her pain and sorrow about the whole thing. She literally lost everything she had over food. Jacked up.
My daughter was the only kid in her middle school homeroom classroom who still had a mom n dad married and living together.we are white.her class was 50 % white 45% black and 5% other.we lived in suburbs but only 10 miles from the city she was 12 at that time.the further we moved into the suburbs the better the odds that our daughters classmates parents were still married.so when she was 15 we moved further out to the suburbs.now we were 16 miles from the city.her class had 70% white ; 20 % black and 10 % other.now half her classroom had parents still married.she grew up and graduated highschool.she got a career in dog training, she owns a home has a son and has stayed off drugs and doesnt drink.shes a terrific living caring daughter.her friends who all came from broken homes hung out at our house.we treated those teens like they were our kids.some who strayed off got into trouble with the law.drugs fights etc.others though stayed on the path of good and grew up to have good lives.id like to think that my conversations with many of them and being there for them when they were going through rough times helped them.their one parent home didnt ir couldnt help them cause that parent was working two jobs to support their kid.many of those one parent homes thanked me for perusal over their kid while they worked.i recall them calling my home asking if so n so was there.when I told them yes they would sigh with relief. Knowing their kids were at a home that had two parents that were not druggys or drunks, that had rules; that provided meals,rides home, emotional and mental support really made those single parents able to relax a little.
A few things need to be clarified. First, we always have to be careful about correlations vs causations. Fatherlessness results in an impoverished home, and that leads to kids raised in poor neighborhoods where the culture is impoverished in a multitude of other ways. Further, mental health issues are inherited, so kids with mental health issues will have parents with similar issues, and they will be less likely to manage marriage and child rearing together. And more causes could be named. But those issue aside, I argue the central core problem that is paramount throughout our modern US culture, and that for whatever reason is hitting the black community particularly hard, stems from the rejection of God and His moral authority. This has led to significant increases in sex outside of marriage and recreational substance abuse, among others. So many of the problems in our culture can be traced back directly to these two issues.
Welfare programs are a necessity for women and children that are abandoned by their husbands/fathers, like my mom, sister, and me. My mom did things right. She married my father, then they had children. Long story short, my father abandoned my mom, me, and my unborn sister. If we hadn’t had government assistance programs, I don’t know where our food, dental care, or medical care would have come from. My mom was too sick to work for most of my life. We had no other income source for most of my childhood, except for a friend here and there. There weren’t many charities in our area then. It was the 80s and 90s. We would have been in a horrible situation if we hadn’t had those programs. But having said that, there are definitely people who abuse the system. The system is bloated and backward. It needs an overhaul by people that know what they’re doing AND that care about the needy and about stopping the abuse (or at least reducing it). I’ll never forget the time, around 2008, I was working as a cashier in a grocery store, ALWAYS late on bills, financially supporting my mom and one of my sisters on that TINY ($8/hr) salary and too proud/embarrassed to go back on government assistance again. A man and woman strolled up to the register and bought half a shopping cart of steak, shrimp, and lobster tails. They were on sale but still… the woman smugly said to me “It’ll be EBT,” and whipped that food stamp card out with the biggest smile on her face. I literally had to take payday loans every month to pay my bills.
The middle class is shrinking because of these policies as well. Self supporting couples don’t want or need governmental control of their lives. Keep’em single, keep’em kept, keep’em voting democrat. Want to talk about slavery? Let’s talk about how being “kept” by a government all for a vote is slavery!
Yes!! You are so right! And even being a white person, welfare and the ” state ” do not want you to get off food stamps or any subsidy they provide!! ( I only receive food stamps!! ) If you make more money than you have declared to them, they punish you, for making it, by lowering your food stamp amount! Which keeps you at the level of… still needing them!! I know! I am disabled and only made $700+ a month for years! I was receiving $147 in food stamps. ( try living on that! ) Then my ex husband got on social security! When than happened I was allowed $200 dollars a month more! Gee, and I thought it was a God send, until and because, I was receiving more $ a month, food stamps lowered my amount to $35 a month!!! Ya!! And when I asked about it, my case worker came back with….”.well, your making $1000 a month now, you are able to buy your groceries now!! ” REALLY??? you do the math!!! It puts me right back to where I’ve always been….. WAY BELOW POVERTY LEVEL!!! AND I GUESS THAT’S WHERE I’LL ALWAYS BE!!! 😎😎😎
Very interesting statistics. …so, where are these father’s of these children? Irregardless of race, the family unit seems THE key factor in a happier, healthier community! I totally agree with you, catastrophic family casualties result in the destruction of our communities across the board. It seems selfishness is at the center of this problem.
The family is the core of any great local community and by extension, country. They have been systematically tearing the family apart through early ‘education’ for years. Needs to stop via defunding or similar post November 3rd & Trump’s re-election. Their family will be their evolving tribes … i wish them lots of luck with that.
Meanwhile Russia, Hungary Poland etc are promoting the unit and the sanctity of nuclear family. I am Italian and it’s happening the same thing, with catholic principles disappearing, and the state taking the rule of men to be a provided, women have no incentive to find a good man that stick around and help her raising the children’s, actually they promote the opposite, is obvious that there is a international cartel that promote this policies.
Old news,Stephan Molyneux gave these facts out,no one cares,people are getting paid to stay home,and petrified of Covid as you see them shaking in their masks terrified, believing in the MSM instead of their own eyes, you can’t fix stupid or cowardice, millennials will.have to find out the hard way since they’re going to vote for the left they have to live with the outcome…..
The problem isn’t as much the welfare state, per se, but the Democratic Party’s version of the welfare state. I’m speaking of a sensible system of social welfare that will not let the unavoidably disadvantaged, such as those with legitimate disabilities and the aged without families, starve and or suffer exposure from lack of shelter in. In other words, a system along the lines suggested by F.A. Hayek, Milton Friedman & Charles Murray. Also a credo or ethos that stresses the importance of work and family. Not the cradle to grave “nanny state” the Democrats and radical leftist intellectuals have used as a carrot & stick ploy to gain power with over the last 65+ years. Most critically is the fallacious rationale that it’s the primary responsibility of government to solve all problems within society. Frederick Bastiat said one of the problems with the socialist mindset is their failure to make the distinction between society and the state. This pollutes all dialog as to how to remedy problems which do exist in society as well as the state. “In order to form a more perfect union” is open to a wide interpretation but it seems only Democrats have been acting as the interpreters over the last 100 years. The Republican Party has forgotten that it was also, at one time, a progressive party under Lincoln and TR, however, it’s the Democrats that now own the concept and they’ve turned progressivism into a dirty word.