Is It Healthy To Share Custody Of A Dog?

3.5 rating based on 162 ratings

Joint custody of a pet is possible when people separate or divorce, but it is a serious matter for the pet’s emotional health. Courts want to know who cares for the pet and will keep it healthy and happy, just like with child custody. Evidence of walking the pet, taking it to vet appointments, and generally spending time together all work in your favor. However, not all dogs adjust well to shared custody. Some dogs can settle in just fine to a life split between two homes, but this is not always the case. For many dogs, it is a stressful way to live and not ideal for them.

To keep pet custody out of court, one way to keep it out of court is to have a fair custody agreement that provides either for joint custody of the pet or for sole custody with a visitation schedule for the other partner. Joint custody is usually not a legal option, and understanding dog ownership laws can help you keep your furry best. Joint custody of dogs and cats, especially between unmarried couples, poses unique challenges. To avoid potential disputes and protect your pet’s custody, it is advisable to establish a pet custody agreement before any separation occurs. This agreement functions similarly to a child custody agreement.

Shared custody is most likely to be successful with younger, very well-adjusted, confident, and easy-going dogs. Equally important is how the dynamic between the two partners after their separation is. If the handoffs between the partners are angry and heated every time, this is not a fair situation for dogs. The short answer is that not all dogs adjust well to shared custody. Some dogs can settle in just fine to a life split between two homes, but this may be of great benefit to the children as the pet provides unconditional love and constancy as the child goes from house to house. A dog can be shared with an average of 2-3 families, and the dog would stay at each family’s house for an agreed upon time, say 1-3 days.

Co-parenting pets offers a host of benefits and considerations for individuals or families seeking shared responsibilities in pet ownership. Most shared-custody agreements are negotiated without a judge’s intervention, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the process goes smoothly.

Useful Articles on the Topic
ArticleDescriptionSite
Shared custody of a dog?? : r/datingoverthirtyThe guy I’ve just started dating a couple weeks ago has told me the other day that he “shares custody” of his dog with his ex. They switch off weekly.reddit.com
Does it ever make sense for folks to have joint custody of …This may be of great benefit to the children – because the pet provides unconditional love and constancy as the child goes from house to house.linkedin.com
Who Keeps the Dog? Divorce Advice from a Pet Custody ExpertShared custody is most likely to be successful with younger, very well-adjusted, confident, and easy-going dogs. Equally important: How is the dynamic between …journal.iaabcfoundation.org

📹 Puppy Custody Battle Brings Couple to Court! Part 2

Heather says the dog she got with her ex Owen was a birthday present, but he says otherwise! #JudgeJudy The Original! There’s …


Can A Dog Bond With Two Owners
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Can A Dog Bond With Two Owners?

Yes, dogs can bond with multiple owners, typically forming healthy and strong relationships with each. Experts highlight that dogs exhibit a "love the one you’re with" attitude, often being equally happy with familiar humans. Just like a child can love both parents, dogs can develop attachments to several individuals, with each bond being unique. The strength of these bonds increases with shared experiences, and differing reasons for affection can exist between each owner. Scientific research emphasizes dogs as social animals capable of forming emotional connections, supported by attachment theory which explains how bonds develop.

In multi-owner households, it's important for all owners to maintain consistency in their interactions. While dogs can indeed bond equally with multiple caregivers, some may show a slight preference for one based on attention and care received. Factors such as age, background, and behavior can also influence these relationships. In diverse living scenarios, including those involving divorce or shared custody, dogs often foster strong bonds with all parties involved.

Therefore, it’s entirely possible for a dog to love and connect with more than one owner, showcasing loyalty and affection to each. Understanding these dynamics can improve the relationship between dogs and their various caregivers, ensuring a fulfilling bond for all.

What Are The Negatives Of Joint Custody
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What Are The Negatives Of Joint Custody?

Co-parenting can pose significant challenges, particularly when it comes to shared child custody, which may exacerbate pre-existing conflicts from the divorce. Effective communication and conflict resolution skills are essential; without them, joint custody arrangements may negatively impact the child. "Physical custody" determines where the child lives, and joint physical custody means parents share this responsibility, leading to regular interactions until the child is an adult. However, this format often demands ongoing negotiation between parents, which can be a source of tension.

Joint custody has its disadvantages, including logistical challenges, as parents must constantly coordinate schedules and decisions. This can heighten conflicts where trust is lacking. While joint legal and physical custody means shared authority over the child's wellbeing, it requires strong cooperation, which may not exist in high-conflict situations.

The emotional toll on children and parents can also be significant; constant transitions between homes can introduce instability in the child's life. While joint custody can yield benefits, particularly for children's involvement with both parents, the potential for increased parental conflict and logistical difficulties highlights the importance of carefully weighing its pros and cons in the context of a stable, nurturing environment for the child.

Is Split Custody Bad For Dogs
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Is Split Custody Bad For Dogs?

Shared custody of pets, particularly dogs, can be challenging, especially for those exhibiting stress. Younger, well-adjusted, and easy-going dogs may adapt better to splitting their time between two homes. However, it's crucial to consider the dynamic between the separated partners. Not all dogs thrive in shared custody; many experience anxiety and stress due to the instability of shifting between households. This can lead to behavioral issues such as barking, destructiveness, or escape attempts.

To facilitate a smoother transition post-separation, it’s advisable to establish ownership clearly by registering and renewing licenses under one person's name. Additionally, partners should discuss and divide the costs associated with pet care, covering essential needs like grooming and medical expenses.

Creating a pet custody agreement can outline the dog's living arrangements, fostering an understanding that prioritizes the pet's welfare. It's important to remember that dogs thrive on routine, and shared custody often disrupts this critical need. If a dog struggles with these changes, it's worth exploring alternatives to the shared custody model.

While divorcing couples may need to fight for their pet's custody, it doesn't have to lead to disaster for the dog. Open communication and a focus on the pet's best interests can help ease the transition. Despite the complexities of divorce and pet custody disputes, finding a solution that respects both partners’ responsibilities and meets the pet's emotional needs is achievable.

Is It Bad For Dogs To Go Back And Forth Between Houses
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Is It Bad For Dogs To Go Back And Forth Between Houses?

Living between two homes can be stressful for many dogs, and whether it is suitable depends on the individual dog's temperament. Some can adapt well, perceiving both locations as home, while others may struggle with the transition due to anxiety triggered by changes in routine, environment, and people. Conducting a trial session can help assess your dog’s ability to adjust.

Key factors influencing a dog's adaptation include their natural disposition, consistency in routine, and familiarity in both homes. As dogs are social creatures attached more to their humans than to places, the absence of their primary caregivers can increase their stress. Additionally, if one home includes other pets, this could lead to conflict or discomfort.

While some dogs thrive in dual living situations, particularly those that are outgoing and confident, timid or nervous breeds may experience increased stress levels, moodiness, lethargy, or even destructive behavior. To enhance well-being, owners should strive to create nurturing, familiar environments in both homes.

Owners should also be prepared for the care demands of a dog living between two houses, ensuring adequate time for love and interaction. With thoughtful planning and a supportive approach, it is feasible for dogs to split their time successfully between two homes, albeit with careful consideration of each dog’s unique needs and personality.

What Happens If You Have Joint Custody Of A Pet
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What Happens If You Have Joint Custody Of A Pet?

Joint custody of pets can lead to complications, particularly if one party neglects the animal's hygiene or well-being, or even abuses them; such cases should be reported to authorities. The determination of pet custody often depends on varying state laws, especially during divorce or separation proceedings. As pets are increasingly viewed as family members, some states have begun recognizing the need for custody arrangements similar to those for children, leading to the development of Joint Custody Orders.

Courts may allow shared custody, visitation, and even pet alimony, primarily for dog ownership disputes. Proving ownership can be complicated, and pet custody conflicts often arise when both parties claim ownership. In custody cases, judges may consider how pet ownership impacts any children involved and could award sole ownership or treat the pet as joint property tied to other marital assets. Establishing a pet custody agreement prior to separation is advisable to mitigate disputes.

Shared custody focuses on the pet's time with each parent, while joint custody emphasizes shared decision-making. The effectiveness of shared arrangements can vary; some pets may adapt well, while others may struggle with splitting time between homes. In many states, pets are viewed as personal property, complicating emotional attachments during divorce.

Is It Healthy To Co-Parent A Dog
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Is It Healthy To Co-Parent A Dog?

Involving multiple households in the care of dogs through co-parenting enhances interaction and attention, significantly reducing risks of loneliness and boredom. Dogs thrive on social engagement, benefitting from more playtime, exercise, and mental stimulation when co-parented. A survey indicated that one in four people are open to the idea of dog co-parenting, often driven by reasons like cost efficiency, time constraints, and the belief that the dog would be better cared for.

Co-parenting allows owners to share expenses while providing the dog with companionship from the parent who has more time. It’s essential for potential co-parents to discuss and create a shared ownership plan, often referred to as "joint custody." Clear legal agreements regarding responsibilities and routines are vital for effective co-parenting, reflecting an amicable relationship between the owners. Although this arrangement can lead to more enriched lives for dogs, it requires thorough communication and compassionate consideration for the dog’s well-being.

Not all dogs adapt to split custody well, with individual temperament playing a crucial role. Successful co-parenting hinges on mutual respect and understanding of each other's expectations, while maintaining a consistent routine for the pet. Ultimately, well-executed co-parenting can create fulfilling lives for both dogs and their owners, navigating modern relationship dynamics effectively.

Can Pet Custody Be Kept Out Of A Divorce
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Can Pet Custody Be Kept Out Of A Divorce?

Divorce cases increasingly involve disputes over pets, including family dogs. To avoid contentious custody battles, individuals can utilize pet custody agreements, similar to prenuptial agreements. It’s crucial to consider a pet’s well-being during a divorce, as they can experience stress akin to family members. Most states view pets as marital property, impacting custody. When determining custody, three factors come into play: mutual agreements, legal ownership, or judicial decisions, which often follow property law. Mediation can help couples resolve pet custody issues amicably, while states like North Carolina do not treat pets as children in custody disputes.

Recent laws, such as California's Family Code Section 2605, empower judges to consider a pet's welfare during divorce proceedings, treating them as more than mere property. Nonetheless, pets remain classified as personal property in ownership terms, complicating emotional attachments. A collaborative approach that includes a "pet parenting plan" can help facilitate joint custody or shared ownership.

Ultimately, amicably negotiating pet custody can lead to a less contentious divorce process, providing peace of mind for both parties and ensuring a stable environment for the beloved pets caught in the middle.

Why Is Joint Custody The Best
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Why Is Joint Custody The Best?

Joint custody promotes effective communication and cooperation between parents, benefiting children's well-being and fostering healthier co-parenting relationships. This arrangement, preferred for its advantages, leads to stronger familial bonds and lower long-term costs associated with raising children. Research indicates that children spending at least 35% of their time with each parent exhibit improved relationships with both, excel academically, have better psychological and social outcomes, and show reduced tendencies toward smoking and substance abuse.

Moreover, children in joint-custody scenarios experience fewer behavioral and emotional issues, enhanced self-esteem, and a more positive overall development compared to those in sole-custody situations.

Joint custody includes both physical and legal aspects, where parents share substantial time and decision-making responsibilities for their child's life regarding healthcare, education, and extracurricular activities. The key distinction lies in shared custody dividing physical time while joint custody emphasizes shared decision-making authority. Optimal outcomes arise when parents maintain a cooperative relationship, thereby allowing both to remain actively engaged in their children's upbringing.

The court often favors joint custody when it is believed to serve the child's best interests, primarily focused on maintaining strong relationships between the child and both parents. In conclusion, joint custody arrangements yield several benefits, including better emotional health, academic performance, and overall quality of life for children, making it the preferred choice when both parents are willing and capable of working together harmoniously.

Is It Healthy To Share A Dog
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Is It Healthy To Share A Dog?

Sharing a pet, particularly a dog, can help maintain and preserve existing relationships, especially when a beloved animal is involved. The act of co-sleeping with your dog strengthens your bond through increased cuddle time, intimacy, and mutual trust, which is essential during vulnerable activities like sleeping. While a new trend known as "dog sharing" is emerging, it’s important to weigh the pros and cons for both the owners and the pet.

Studies indicate that pet ownership promotes physical and mental health, and sharing a bed can enhance those benefits by maximizing time spent together. A consistent routine across homes is crucial for the dog’s well-being, according to animal experts.

However, while many pet owners enjoy having their dogs share their beds, there are potential health risks to consider, such as allergies or disrupted sleep patterns. The decision is influenced by individual preferences and health considerations. Moreover, sharing a dog between two homes can be manageable and beneficial, as it offers companionship and eases loneliness. Despite possible challenges, dog sharing arrangements can thrive if properly structured, allowing for financial sharing of pet-related costs. Ultimately, the bond between dogs and their owners is profound, making such arrangements worthy of consideration for the happiness of both pets and their humans.

Can You Have Joint Custody Of A Dog
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Can You Have Joint Custody Of A Dog?

Joint custody of pets is a serious issue that some couples face during separation or divorce. Although there are no specific laws governing pet custody for unmarried partners, emotional well-being for pets can lead to disputes about who retains ownership. In cases where couples are breaking up, seeking legal advice from a child custody lawyer familiar with pet custody matters may be necessary, as ownership disputes can arise.

While animals are legally treated as property in the U. S., couples can create custody agreements that allow them to share time with their pets, similar to co-parenting. Although an official joint custody arrangement isn't recognized, a shared possession agreement stipulating visitation schedules can be beneficial. It's crucial to address expenses related to pet care, such as food and veterinary costs, in these agreements.

Pets may adjust differently to shared custody; some thrive split between two homes, while others may struggle. Courts primarily view pets as property, so traditional custodial rights do not apply. In a few states like Alaska, Illinois, and California, some courts have recognized pet custody disputes, indicating shifting perspectives on pet ownership. Ultimately, open communication and a fair custody agreement can help mitigate potential conflicts regarding beloved pets during relationship separations.

Are Dogs Happier When They Have A Sibling
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Are Dogs Happier When They Have A Sibling?

Adopting a sibling for your dog can provide valuable companionship, potentially reducing boredom, separation anxiety, and loneliness, as dogs are inherently social beings. However, it may also lead to sibling rivalry, where dogs compete for resources and attention. While many dogs might not experience significant displacement when a new sibling is introduced, others could feel uncertain. Pampered pups can recognize siblings based on scent and past experiences, particularly identifying those they lived with even after long separations.

Each dog has a unique personality; some thrive with a companion, while others prefer solitude. For many, having a playful sibling promotes socialization and general happiness. Nonetheless, it’s crucial to introduce new dogs carefully to prevent aggressive behavior, especially if there's been a long period apart. Studies suggest that having another dog may lead to a longer, healthier life for both pets.

However, ensure that you maintain equal attention to both dogs to prevent bonding primarily with each other, reducing their connection to you. Ultimately, the decision to adopt a second dog should be informed by understanding each dog's needs and preferences, recognizing that not all dogs will enjoy having a sibling, and that proper training and socialization are key.

Are Dogs Happier With Two
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Are Dogs Happier With Two?

Dogs are inherently social animals and often thrive in group settings, making the adoption of a second dog a beneficial decision. One key advantage is that dogs can keep each other company, providing entertainment and exercise together. The presence of a companion can enhance their emotional well-being. However, selecting a second dog requires careful consideration of both temperament and breed, as some dogs may not coexist peacefully.

Having two dogs can lead to numerous benefits, including companionship, better training experiences, and increased physical activity. Both dogs can entertain and motivate each other, which is essential for their overall health. Nonetheless, potential challenges exist, such as ensuring that the dogs have compatible energy levels and behaviors.

While many dogs are happier with a canine companion, others may prefer being alone. A multi-dog household offers benefits like easier training dynamics and increased socialization. However, it demands more time and effort from owners to manage interactions and playtime.

Ultimately, adopting a second dog can be a rewarding experience, fostering companionship, socialization, and added joy within the household. Families considering this option should weigh the pros and cons while assessing their capacity to meet the needs of multiple pets.


📹 Why Pet Custody Can Be Messy In Divorce

Puppy Wars: The Reality Of Pet Custody In Divorce If one’s nuclear family disintegrates, who gets custody of Fido? In the past, the …


Freya Gardon

Hi, I’m Freya Gardon, a Collaborative Family Lawyer with nearly a decade of experience at the Brisbane Family Law Centre. Over the years, I’ve embraced diverse roles—from lawyer and content writer to automation bot builder and legal product developer—all while maintaining a fresh and empathetic approach to family law. Currently in my final year of Psychology at the University of Wollongong, I’m excited to blend these skills to assist clients in innovative ways. I’m passionate about working with a team that thinks differently, and I bring that same creativity and sincerity to my blog about family law.

About me

31 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • ​ I think she cares more about the fact that he’s enjoying the dog than she cares about the dog. Seems like a chill guy. Good job. Good home. If he didn’t want to care for the dog, he’d say “take you’re damn dog.” The fact that he cares for it (and is probably on social media with it, makes her upset. She can’t claim the furniture or the kids or the car or the bills….she wants the dog to hurt him. It’s like Solomon with the dead child. I bet if JJ said “let’s kill the dog and you both get half, she would have been pleased.”

  • The dog was more than likely a 6-8 week old puppy when they brought it home. The guy has been the constant care giver to the dog since then. Plus he has had it Exclusively for the last 7 months which is years to a puppy. Plus he has a yard for the dog to run around in instead of being couped up in an apartment all day while she would be at work. He Definitely deserves to keep the dog

  • Wow!!! SOMEONE is an emotional MESS!! This girl has some serious psychological issues. #1 doesn’t make any sense that she says it was a “Birthday gift”, that SHE PURCHASED for herself??? #2, just how emotionally attached can she be with a dog that she hasn’t even had for like 7 months? She’s s mess!

  • If she thought the dog would be ‘better looked after by her’ then why would she leave it with him for so long! That’s like leaving your child with a relative for it’s whole life and then trying to get them back because you don’t trust your relative. If you didn’t trust your relative you wouldn’t have left the child in the first place!!! She tried it!!

  • Like I said in part 1, the plaintiff wasted time suing for the dog. Move on and get another dog. I agree with the outcome of the case 🙂 Yes the plaintiff paid for the dog but the defendant has taken care of the dog for most of it’s life!! So much for a “we got the dog as my birthday present” that I paid for 🤣

  • Plaintiff grew up never being told NO ! I laughed so hard as she started her fake anxiety attack and JJ was already half way to lunch ! She only wanted the dog back to spite defendant, she probably realized she was better off with him and he realized he was better off without her, so she brought this suit against him for the dog.

  • This is why, if you live together, like you’re married, but you’re not married: you’re a joker. I know because I did this for almost twelve years and this man was, like, never really sure if he was going to stay, or if we were going to have kids… But, when I left, suddenly, he was super sure. You gotta start with commitment not live as a couple and hope that you get there.

  • Okay the tears wasn’t for the dog at all 😂 that was a manipulation tactic for the boyfriend. She was all fine when she thought she was in control, then when lost she went to the next tactic… Which probably worked during their relationship. That guy definitely dodged a bullet and I hope he and the pup are very happy together 🥰

  • I feel for this girl. The dog was hers. She bonded with it. She came back for it, and he closed the door in her face. To the people saying “if it was for your birthday, why pay for it?” – Because that’s what you do. My mom got me a kitten for my birthday when I was 23. She paid someone to get it… but I’m the one who took it to the vet and paid for all his vaccines and neutering. She clearly cared about this dog, it was not just a piece of property to her.

  • Nope, I think the judge got it wrong. In the court of law, dogs and pets are considered personal property. She paid for the dog, it’s hers. I would’ve asked other questions like how much time has she seen the dog since she left, does she visit with the dog, and why wasn’t the dog there to see who it was more bonded to. The judge was pretty cold on this one.

  • Personally I understand a lot of these comments and where you all are coming from in regards to the way that this girl is acting but if you actually take a deeper look at it she does have a lot of emotions and that dog was bought for her for her birthday and the guy knows this that she loves animals so because they broke up the dog gets to stay with him but it wasn’t originally his dog it was hers. That’s weird that’s like a child the parent feels as if that when they break up the child should stay with them no and just because the dog wasn’t with her for 7 months does not mean anything she deserves to have her animal You don’t use the dog as a pawn just because you broke up That’s what she received when they were together for her birthday and she should be able to take it with her when she left That’s very hurtful of him to do that to her that means he did not have any love for this lady because he doesn’t care about her emotions at all even after the relationship

  • This reminds me of when my ex moved out to live with my friend (of course I didnt know, we were “on break” before our wedding) and she and her mother came back 8 months later to pick up our bearded dragon. I fed him, paid for his vet bills (he had an impaction which cost a pretty penny) and paid for the electricity for his lights and heat lamp. She walked in fully expecting to take the vivarium, my little buddy AND had the balls to claim I was going to be violent. The officer she brought along eventually pulled them out. Her mother was with but honestly was just as duped as I was when she stated she just wanted to come an talk. She paid for him, I paid for the entire setup food and everything after. If you think something is yours take it day 1. Find a place if you cant take to your new one. I had that little guy for over 10 years after she left and im sooo glad I fought for him.

  • It’s always interesting when people yell after JJ about how much evidence they have when JJ didn’t base her decision on that. “I have the adoption papers! I have vet bills!” JJ said she does not want to take the dog away from the person its known its whole life. She doesn’t care how much paperwork you have.

  • It’s very rare when JJ gets it wrong… but a dog is property and she paid for it with receipts so it’s her property and if you are going to give it to the Man then he should have had to pay for it. She should have been rewarded the total for the dog to go by another one or bare minimum half price of the dog.

  • Oh she’s such a bad actress probably doing it to get back at him. If she cared that much she would have tried for the poor dog sooner. Abandoned both the dog and the cat he was kind enough to give u the cat back after 3 months cos you had it before you met. Wouldn’t have gotten that much from me. It is not your dog and who says it was gotten for my birthday but then says I payed for it myself. Its not a gift then

  • I’m gonna get slaughtered for this…but… That crying wasn’t fake. That girl loved the dog. Paid for the dog etc. But… I do agree with the decision! Dog has pretty much only knew the guy and he cared for it over a half year before she wanted it back. But I still have a heart and she wasn’t faking it. That cry people are saying was fake. But she was so emotional over the decision that she hyperventilated.

  • She shouldn’t have agreed to be on JJ. I’m not even sure if a civil suit was the right move. Pet ownership is a tricky subject. But all her financial proof does nothing for JJ. A local judge may have been different. Animal control would almost certainly call her the owner. If she paid for the microchip and has the only access to that account… things could get dicey. But nope. She went on JJ so the ruling is final. 😂

  • From an emotional standpoint, I agree with the judge that it would be cruel to remove the dog from the only home he’s ever known. From a strictly legal standpoint (where pets are considered property), it wouldn’t matter whether or not she could prove that she bought the dog or that the dog was hers. She left in January. Didn’t turn up again until April. In any jurisdiction, that much time would result in the property being legally abandoned.

  • Way to go Your Honorable Judge Judy !!! He’s the one who’s been taking care of and loving the dog so he should keep the dog !!! Thankful that drug addict ex-wife let me have custody of our sweet Willie boy(a Yorkie) when we separated in 2013, if not he probably wouldn’t have lived the long life he did !! He & I shared 13 wonderful and loving years together unfortunately my sweet boy crossed that Rainbow Bridge 11-25-2020 and my world hasn’t and never will be the same without him !! 💔🐕‍🦺🐾💔🐕‍🦺🐾

  • This is why I didn’t pursue custody of Augie. I paid all the vet bills. Nursed him as an infant through a horrific infection he had before we got him. Cleaned up his vomit and diarrhoea. Got him healthy. I Loved him more than any animal IV ever had. And I grew up on a hobby farm. I bought all his food and medication and was up all night every night till he was well. Trained him, loved him with my whole heart. This puppy was my baby. Lept into my arms from anywhere he could and I even let him sleep in my bed while my partner was occupied with other women…. I don’t usually let my pets sleep with me. But my ex paid for the adoption. I used to see Augie. Now I don’t. I love Augie always. All I can do

  • Female (FAKE) “Emotional” DRAMA to (get back @T) an ex… To {try to} play on HIS emotions… If she cared about that dog’s emotions she would be happy to want the dog to stay with him… !!! … SHE IS THE ONE WHO CHOSE TO LEAVE THE “CAT” THE “DOG” and “HIM”… She ONLY cared about herself… Her retaliation towards HIS happiness (Without her DID NOT WORK… Ha Ha Ha… . (🤣) °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

  • If she paid for it regardless of anything he kepted the dog illegally…he should have to give the dog back or reimburse her..judge be trippin with the dogs been there the whole time..he could be miserable without her..he seems a lil petty and i believe her when she said she did everything for the dog…he kept the dog to spite her

  • I’m a little torn on this one. I don’t remember if she said why she didn’t take the dog when she left, but she did say when she tried to see the dog, he wouldn’t let her in the house. That has to count for something. On the other hand, the dog didn’t live with her for 7 months, she didn’t say she supplied the dog food or paid vet bills, and if she had done that, she might have had a stronger case. But at this point, the dog has been with the same person his entire life, and it would be an adjustment for the dog – or maybe not – articles abound on YouTube of dogs and owners separated from months to years and the dog is thrilled to see that person again. So, for once, I’m not sure. 🤔

  • The way she MADE THE DECISION to cry is wild to me. I could see it in her eyes. Crying just happens if you’re emotional. You don’t have to pause, close your eyes, and get into character. I can tell she’s the type to cry, get what she wants, and then turn around and wipe the tears away. She paid for the dog but there was a back and forth exchange of expenses. If he’s paying the entirety of the mortgage and anything to do with the house and she buys FOOD, then she can buy the agreed upon dog. I feel like you can’t leave a pet for an extended period of time, not take care of the expenses while they’re in another’s care, and then want the pet back with you full time when it’s convenient for you. He may not have put money towards the dog but he was taking care of YOU. He more than covered his part when the dog belonged to them both.

  • She should have gotten her money back. The dog being left with him makes sense. He took care of it for most of his lifetime. But her asking about the mortgage… Madam it’s his house. He owns it. He should be the one paying it. If anything this was a fair split and even beneficial to him. He paid for the house HE KEPT and she fed him and paid his bills. He is the one winning in the finances.

  • how can she act like he is stealing her child from her she hasnt even been in the dogs life in months and wants to waltz back in like she has a right to the dog when she doesn’t. sue for visitation if she is that passionate about seeing the dog but she would probably steal it then, i think she just wants to stick it to him, maybe the dog has a new mommy now or something and she is livid about that.

  • yeah i have a dog and 2 cats, im not leaving them behind while i get myself together. they’re coming with me, 100% of the time.they’re no different than my kids. you can’t just up and leave then decide you want them later. i also think tho, that he’s bitter she broke up with him and is keeping the dog out of spite- he said “she wanted this” so yeah….

  • Whoops, the hyperventilating drama at the end was quick and unexpected. 😳Without mocking her or being mean: These kind of reactions are highly trained. She established that eye-closing and breathing to get herself in tears as soon as she couldn’t get through with arguments and words. I’ve seen that in children a lot. But a decent and humble education leads to a more grown-up behaviour. That would be way more helpful for her to get through in life.

  • Plaintif showed her true colors. Not getting her way? Instant ignoring and disrespecting Judge Judy and when Judge Judy rightfully left, started fake crying to get what she wants. She claims it’s her dog but during the seven months she abandoned “her” dog, she makes no claims of paying for dog food, vet bills etc. Same for her ten year old cat she dumped with the defendant.

  • I don’t disagree with the judgement. Not because her you know what frigility was annoying af, but looking at the breed of the dog – moving him from a house with several rooms and a backyard to an 1BR apartment (and making $14/hr she sure as hell can’t afford a larger more accomodating space) is simply cruel and inconsiderate. Thanks JJ for being completely unmoved by the fake tears.

  • The plaintiff had every opportunity to find a place that allowed pets before she left the defendant. She didn’t demand the dog back until 7 months later, when the canine had lived with the defendant ever since he was a puppy?! I’m sorry, but the dog belongs to the defendant, and it doesn’t matter how much she paid for the dog. He already imprinted the defendant, so that’s it.

Divorce Readiness Calculator

How emotionally prepared are you for a divorce?
Divorce is an emotional journey. Assess your readiness to face the challenges ahead.

Pin It on Pinterest

We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept
Privacy Policy