Countries with more liberal parental leave policies tend to have higher wage gaps among men and women aged 30-34, according to analyses by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and the International Labour Organization (ILO). Over 2 million mothers globally left the labor force in 2020, contributing to a greater share of unpaid labor. The gender pay gap is 14. 3 overall, but almost halves to 7. 7 when only paid maternity leave is provided.
A new study by Peter Q. Blair and Benjamin Posmanick examines the relationship between the generosity of paid maternity leave and the size of the gender pay gap. They find that a temporary subsidy to mothers’ wage rate, granted immediately after maternity leave, can be effective in reducing the risk of a wage. The negative effect of motherhood on wages is partly due to loss of human capital during parental leave, particularly longer parental leave.
There is scant evidence regarding how parental leave mandates affect the pay gap between mothers and their male coworkers or between mothers and their partners. Paid family leave policies mitigate the gender wage gap by increasing the likelihood that women return to work after childbirth. Limited access to childcare resources and family leave exacerbate the gender wage gap. Women are more likely to spend less time at a given job than their male peers.
Some studies have shown that the motherhood penalty makes up 80 percent of the gender pay gap. Parental leave can explain 94 of the slowdown in gender wage convergence. A decrease of 10 full-rate equivalent leave weeks awarded to mothers reduces the gender wage gap in all countries, but the effects remain small.
Motherhood widens the pay gap between women and men, leading to an estimated $22. 5 billion in annual wage losses. Workplace discrimination and career opportunities related to parental leave are believed to be key factors in the persistent gender pay gap. In 2023, the gender pay gap was a total of 14. 3. Longer parental leave policies encourage longer career interruptions for women, which exacerbates the gender wage gap.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| When you factor in paid maternity leave, is there a wage gap? | My teacher looked at all fifteen of us and said, “Well, when you factor in paid maternity leave, there is no wage gap.” | econ.iastate.edu |
| How to reduce the motherhood penalty and the gender pay … | Some studies have shown the motherhood penalty makes up 80% of the gender pay gap. And it really is about all of these barriers that women headbutt when they … | weforum.org |
| Labour market effects of reducing the gender gap in … | by E Del Rey · 2021 · Cited by 12 — A decrease of 10 full-rate equivalent leave weeks awarded to mothers reduces the gender wage gap in all countries but the effects, although larger, remain small … | sciencedirect.com |
📹 Explained Why Women Are Paid Less FULL EPISODE Netflix
In partnership with Vox Media Studios and Vox, this enlightening explainer series will take viewers deep inside a wide range of …
Do Women Get Maternity Leave?
In countries like Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, women face challenges such as bullying or career stalls, often experiencing a glass ceiling. In contrast, the situation is more severe in the U. S., where maternity leave is not guaranteed. One in four American women return to work just 10 days post-birth, with typical maternity leave lasting about 12 weeks, and many do not qualify for it. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave for new parents, but it only covers certain employees and is unpaid.
Currently, only a few states like California, Rhode Island, and New Jersey offer paid maternity leave. Research indicates that paid leave enhances maternal and infant health and lowers domestic violence rates. Despite overwhelming public support for paid leave in the U. S., only 11 states currently offer it, primarily on the East Coast, and benefits vary significantly. The FMLA stipulates that eligible women must have been employed for at least one year and logged 1, 250 hours to qualify for unpaid leave.
Unfortunately, approximately 40% of women don’t qualify for FMLA protections. In comparison to other industrialized nations, the U. S. is one of the few that lacks a federal mandate for paid maternity leave, which highlights the pressing need for policy reform to ensure better support for new parents.
Does Maternity Leave Affect The Gender Pay Gap?
The enduring gender pay gap remains significant, with the overall gap at 14. 3% in 2023, down from 27. 5% in 1997, but highlighting ongoing challenges. A critical contributor is maternity, which accounts for approximately 80% of the gap. Research shows that men engage in only a third of the unpaid work that women do, exacerbating this disparity. Countries with more generous parental leave policies tend to have wider wage gaps for individuals aged 30-34.
Under federal law, all parents are entitled to 12 weeks of unpaid leave, yet some states offer paid leave. Studies indicate that while the overall gender pay gap is 14. 3%, it drops to 7. 7% when considering paid maternity leave. Paid family leave could help mitigate the gender wage gap by encouraging women to return to work after childbirth. However, evidence on how parental leave mandates impact pay comparisons between mothers and their male counterparts is limited.
The U. S. lacks comprehensive federal paid leave laws. Research further indicates that motherhood negatively affects wages partly due to lost human capital during extended leaves. Policies promoting non-transferable paternity leave for men and expanding paid family leave could enhance women's labor market attachment and help close the wage gap. Ultimately, while maternity leave is beneficial, it alone cannot rectify the gender wage disparity.
Why Is There A Wage Gap?
The gender wage gap is a complex issue influenced by multiple factors, including gender discrimination, occupational choices, and educational pathways. On average, women earn approximately 84 cents for every dollar earned by men, with a 2021 Payscale report indicating women earn 82% of men's earnings. This persistent gap reflects discrimination, occupational segregation, and educational disparities. Research attributes significant portions of the wage gap to time away from the workforce, occupational clustering, and job demands.
Despite advancements in education and shifts to higher-paying occupations, women still encounter pay inequalities. For instance, women earn less than men, even with similar qualifications from top-tier institutions, making about 71 cents for every dollar. The gap is also influenced by the prevalence of women in lower-paying fields and jobs. Contributing factors include racial disparities, access to education, and age. As women tend to seek more flexible work options, they often enter lower-wage positions.
To address these inequalities, it's crucial to explore the reasons behind the wage gap, examining both systemic discrimination and individual career choices. The gender wage gap persists across various occupations, necessitating ongoing examination and intervention to achieve equal pay for equal work.
How Does Maternity Leave Affect Employers?
Companies that provide paid parental leave demonstrate enhanced employee well-being, engagement, retention, and talent acquisition. Research shows that comprehensive support for families improves mental and physical health throughout parenthood. A recent study by Rossin-Slater et al. reveals that New York's taxpayer-funded paid family leave policy, implemented in 2018, did not negatively impact employer assessments of productivity, cooperation, or attendance.
Paid time off for family reasons benefits both employees and employers, prompting both the federal government and leading companies to prioritize these policies. However, longer leaves can sometimes signal a lack of commitment from women in the workplace. Women with access to paid leave are more likely to return to their previous jobs with their pre-leave wages intact, which aids in career stability and progression. Despite numerous benefits, fewer U.
S. employers offer paid maternity and paternity leave. Many organizations have increased parental leave entitlements, and adequate paid leave significantly contributes to child health and lowers maternal stress. Discrimination may arise as employers perceive leaves as costly, impacting hiring decisions for women of childbearing age. Overall, paid parental leave is linked to improved health outcomes, reduced stress, and enhanced job loyalty among employees.
Does Paid Maternity Leave Increase Labor Market Participation?
Women who take advantage of paid maternity leave experience increased labor market participation rates post-motherhood and are more likely to receive pay increases compared to those who do not utilize paid leave. Research indicates that access to paid leave programs enables mothers to take 4. 3 more days off during a child's first year, thus supporting their integration into the workforce. Paid maternity leave provides partial wage replacement, helping families maintain financial stability and avoid dependency on a mother's diminished income.
Over time, access to family paid time off (PTO) significantly narrows the employment participation gap between mothers with young children and women without minor children. Additionally, evidence demonstrates that longer maternity leaves can adversely affect women's employment rates and escalate domestic burdens. However, on the whole, paid leave policies seem to bolster female labor force participation, with women accessing paid family leave up to five years after giving birth showing a notable increase in workforce engagement.
While short-duration paid leave promotes higher participation rates, longer durations may detrimentally influence children's maternal labor supply. Overall, the intersection of paid maternity leave, labor market dynamics, and long-term female employment outcomes suggests a complex trend where access positively influences immediate workforce involvement but potentially imposes drawbacks with extended leave durations.
Why Are People Against Paid Maternity Leave?
Opponents of Paid Family Leave (PFL) argue that it could reduce job attachment, lead to discrimination against women, and impose heavy costs on employers. However, substantial research indicates that paid parental leave provides undeniable benefits to parents, children, and society, with widespread support in the U. S. A poll shows that 93% of Americans believe mothers should receive paid leave after childbirth, while 85% favor national PFL policies.
Despite this, only 13% of workers currently have access to such benefits. Experts assert that paid leave fosters healthier families and improved productivity, with mothers taking leave reportedly returning to work more productive than those who do not. The U. S. remains the sole wealthy nation without a national paid parental leave program, with existing laws, like the Family and Medical Leave Act, lacking true paid options for many. While critics cite costs and potential staffing challenges, the reality is that lack of paid leave disproportionately affects low-income workers and perpetuates inequalities, especially for women.
Limited paid maternity leave risks reinforcing traditional roles, and recent proposals in Congress, including reduced paid leave from 12 weeks to 4 weeks, reflect ongoing challenges in realizing equitable parental leave in the U. S. Overall, prioritizing paid family leave is crucial for modernizing workforce policies.
What Are Some Causes Of The Gender Wage Gap?
La brecha salarial de género es resultado de factores estructurales como diferencias en la ocupación, nivel educativo y experiencia laboral. Al eliminar estas variables, queda lo que se conoce como brecha salarial de género ajustada. Existen muchas causas de esta brecha, incluyendo prácticas discriminatorias, tiempo fuera del empleo y la agrupación ocupacional. Las diferencias en los sectores e industrias donde trabajan hombres y mujeres son las principales explicaciones.
En 2023, las mujeres negras y hispanas perdieron miles de millones en ingresos. A pesar de los esfuerzos, la brecha salarial de género ha cambiado poco en las últimas dos décadas; en 2022, las mujeres ganaron aproximadamente 82 centavos por cada dólar que ganó un hombre. Más del 40 por ciento de esta brecha es "inexplicada", lo que sugiere factores subyacentes no medibles, incluida la discriminación. Algunas de las principales razones incluyen la segregación ocupacional, las barreras para el avance profesional y el viejo paradigma de igualdad salarial.
Las normas de género y las disparidades raciales también desempeñan un papel crucial. La brecha tiende a aumentar con el incremento de salario, lo que afecta más a las mujeres en posiciones de menor remuneración. Es esencial realizar cambios estructurales y culturales para avanzar hacia la igualdad salarial.
How Many Women Get Paid Maternity Leave?
A 2014 study in Maternal and Child Health Journal revealed that only 41% of employed women in the U. S. received paid maternity leave, averaging three weeks, with just 31% wage replacement. About 40% of women do not qualify for the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), which offers 12 weeks of unpaid job protection. Only 12% of women in the private sector can access paid maternity leave. Research shows that paid family leave could potentially lessen the number of women leaving the workforce after childbirth.
While the FMLA guarantees unpaid leave, many mothers struggle to afford this. As of March 2023, only 27% of U. S. private sector workers had access to paid family leave. This lack of federal paid maternity leave has resulted in over 100 million workers—80% of the U. S. workforce—lacking paid time off following childbirth or adoption. The statistics are stark, showing that in certain states like California and New Jersey, a significant percentage of women leave their jobs after childbearing.
Furthermore, research indicates that first-time mothers using paid leave are less likely to quit jobs pre- or post-childbirth. Overall, access to maternity leave and paid family leave remains limited in the U. S., affecting many families' financial security and job retention.
How Does Motherhood Affect The Gender Pay Gap?
The "motherhood penalty" significantly impacts the gender pay gap, creating disparities between mothers' earnings and those of childless women and men. Research indicates that, while women's earnings decline with motherhood, men's earnings remain stable. This penalty accounts for about 80% of the gender pay gap. Last year, mothers earned 31% less than fathers, exemplifying this phenomenon. Women engage in approximately three times as much unpaid labor as men, compounding the issue.
Studies show that the earnings of mothers generally decrease with each additional child, while fathers often see an income boost, referred to as a "fatherhood premium." Despite women earning similarly to men after starting work, motherhood leads to a divergence in pay that widens over time. The effects vary globally, but in wealthier nations, about 80% of the female labor force participation gap results from women exiting the workforce.
The systemic disadvantage faced by mothers results in lower wages and fewer career opportunities, threatening economic security. Thus, the motherhood penalty not only reflects but also perpetuates gender inequalities in various areas of the workplace and society.
Does Maternity Leave Affect The Pay Gap?
Parental leave significantly contributes to the gender wage gap, explaining 94% of its slowdown. Research indicates that this primarily boosts men's wages rather than reducing women's. The 'motherhood penalty' accounts for 80% of the wage disparity, with men performing only a third of the unpaid work compared to women. Interestingly, countries with more liberal parental leave policies often exhibit higher wage gaps among younger men and women.
Federal law offers parents 12 weeks of unpaid leave, with some states providing paid options. The gender pay gap stands at 14. 3% overall but drops to 7. 7% when focusing solely on women who take maternity leave. Men tend to experience wage benefits from fatherhood, whereas women face penalties from motherhood. Experts suggest that mandated paid parental leave could help narrow these gender disparities. Despite family-friendly policies, maternity leave does not solve the wage gap.
Women experience wage penalties during and after childbirth, while limited childcare access exacerbates the issue. Paid family leave can enhance women's chances of returning to work post-childbirth. Ultimately, families lose approximately $22. 5 billion in wages annually due to these disparities in parental leave policies.
📹 the wage gap, the motherhood penalty, & the structure of work
(cc) This is a video about the wage gap, focusing largely on the implications of motherhood, and talking about the structure of work …
What is not spoken about In this debate are women who choose not to have children yet may be overlooked for opportunities by employers who assume she one day will. The “motherhood penalty” can play out in advance for childfree women of childbearing age. Also where is the data on earnings for childfree women vs earnings of men?
Women have you ever worked at a job where a man works the same hours as you, in the same position, with the same seniority, brings in the same amount of money to the company but the boss decides to pay him 22% more than you? If so, why wouldn’t he fire that guy, hire a woman, pay her 22% less and get the exact same results?
I took a course in college titled “Gender & Economics” that was very enlightening and touched on many of these points. Some other important factors noted was that men (weather innate or learned) tend to be more aggressive in negotiations. So if a man and woman are offered the same starting salary, the man is more likely to counteroffer and negotiate a higher amount. Even if they both got 3% raises per year, the gap would still increase. If you don’t believe that some of these factors are at play, look at the pay difference between unskilled and skilled labor. Where education, skills, knowledge, and behaviors are not criteria for success, the gap will be smaller (if at all) for equal work.
@8:20 women who are not caregivers: negligible pay difference compared to men (no sign of sex based discrimination) @8:30 a pay gap based on choices is not discriminatory. True, Women are more likely to raise kids as a single parent, but the courts are also heavily biased for women asking for full custody. Demanding full custody is a choice. If you want to fight real systemic sexual discrimination, that’s your target. Then move on to lengthier prison sentences for men than women for the same crime. Conclusion: there is no pay gap, there’s a raising kids penalty. I’m sure you’d see the same thing for men who are single parents who end up earning less. Again, no sex based discrimination going on. Most married women I know married men who are older than they are, further along in their career, likely making more money than they were. So when couples are making the choice between who spends more time with the kids, the men’s responsibilities shift to make us more money, women’s shift to spend time with kids. This is a choice each couple makes for themselves, let’s not get the government involved in who has to pick up the kids from practice.
I don’t think businesses should be directly responsible for paying their staff’s parental leave. The businesses should be taxed, and the taxes should pay for parental leave. Making them directly responsible puts the financial burden on smaller businesses, on businesses which create more jobs, on businesses which employ more women, and on businesses which welcome prospective parents. All of which would be counterproductive.
I’ve been intensely interested in the gender pay gap for the past few years now, and decided to do my own research in order to come to my own conclusions. This involved a lot of reading and talking to people more knowledgeable on the issue than I was. My first conversation was with a family friend, she’s the HR-director of a major museum. She explained the gender pay gap this way: whenever there’s some new position to be filled, she’s usually the one that conducts all the interviews. When interviewing for managerial positions, each candidate, male or female, always gets asked if they’re okay with business travel, if they’re okay putting in overtime, how well they work in high-stress environments, etc. And every single time, all the male candidates answer with an enthusiastic “yes, no problem!”, while all the female candidates answer with “no, I’m afraid not”. What’s she supposed to do? She’d love to hire more female managers, but they always come off as inflexible in their job interviews. She’s a divorced single mom herself, so she’s well aware WHY women don’t want to work overtime or go on business trips, however that’s the nature of managerial positions. As a manager you don’t get to go home at 5pm and you are sometimes required to take week-long business trips. As a consequence, most managers at her organization are men, despite her best efforts to hire more women. As to the gender gap, she insists that it doesn’t exist. First of all it’s extremely bad PR for a company to pay women less than men for the same work, and secondly, what’s the added value for the company?
I’m quite impressed by the nuance and attention to data this documentary includes. This really is a family issue, not only a “woman pay gap” issue. As a man, I hope that I could someday have the opportunity to take care of my child -and I think many men share a similar sentiment that they don’t want to be seen as just “a wallet” and want to have our partners earn the most possible and have the most opportunity when they chose to work.
Just a friendly reminder: giving an explanation about why such things exist, doesn’t make it okay. It just means that we’re aware society considers women as baby makers before accounting them as a valuable asset to the economy or the society. And with that knowledge in mind, the people in power just decided to turn a blind eye on the matter. Because if you can’t see it, why correct a wrong that doesn’t exist?
Not a single man interviewed, why? The fact that the pay gap is mostly due to different choices of work and worktime, rather than becoming a mother, is not mentioned at all, very weak in a documentary about exactly that issue. One women at the end said it very well. “As long as we make it a womens problem we are reinforcing stereotypes”. For every womens issue in progressive countries in todays world, there is a antagonist mens issue. A women loses her husbad in war – A man died to protect his country/family. A women stays home to raise the children – A man has the pressure to provide for them. Most caregivers are women and are underpayed – Most labourers are men and are underpayed There are way more single moms than single dads – A man has a much harder time to get custody for the child A women has the burden to decide for or against abortion – A man can not decide if his child is gonna be born A women is more likely to be seen as weak – A man can not show weakness The list goes on almost infinite, and most of it is NOT just due to the structure of our society but because of the biological and psychological differences and the symbiose between men and women that created the structure of our society. We are a TEAM and we are supposed to complement each other, if we now try to tackle these differences unilaterally with the goal of equal outcomes, we bring the relationship between men and women and thus the structure of our society out of balance and only create new issues, like for example the demonisation of typical male character traits and sexual desires, a raise in psychological issues in both men and women, gender issues, MORE single parents, MORE divorces and many many more.
Disappointed that the article didn’t mention differential career choices by men and women. In my country, even though college applications are completely gender-blind, men represent about 70% of all engineering degrees (which are known to pay more), while women represent about 95% of education and psychology degrees (which are known to pay less).
One extremely important yet, oddly left out of the article, is the Equal Pay Act of 1963 in the US, in 1970 in the UK, and most other Western countries. It has been illegal (and it should be) to pay women less for the same job based on their sex. If a woman or a man believes they are being paid less for doing the same work because of their sex, they can file a complaint with the EEOC in the United States. Oddly, the EEOC sees less than 1000 cases per year on gender pay discrimination and less than 100 per year actually are valid complaints. So, if all women, systemically, are paid less for the same work because they are female, why are there not millions of EEOC complaints filed per year? Anyone? Did I already answer my own question…
Shared parental leave wasn’t available with my first and I got 2 weeks off. It was with my second and so I took 3 months off to look after with our 2. I loved it, the bond that was created with my second was so much stronger by having those 3 months. People make out like men don’t want parental leave/paternity leave. This isn’t 1940 anymore, we like being Dads, give both parents 6 months leave!
I would have loved to see the 2018 Danish study also measure the effect on men’s pay who take parental leave or reduced responsibilities at work after having a child. Instead, it measured only the effect on each gender group as a whole, so we’re left not knowing whether the pay gap for motherhood is actually a pay gap for parenthood, affecting either parent who takes extended leave, reduces professional responsibilities, or drops out of the workforce altogether after having a child.
Netflix releasing large productions of educational value during the coronavirus / pandemi period. For free, on youtube, without having to create an account or login, unlike the other big streams that require login. Netflix liberando grandes produções de valor educativo no periodo do coronavirus/pandemi. De graca, no youtube, sem preciaar criar conta ou login, ao contrario dos outros grandes streamings qque exigem login..
I also think something that isn’t talked about enough is men who would prefer to spend more time as a stay-at-home dad. I have met quite a few men who seem to feel that they don’t have the choice to stay home and raise their children when they really want to. The biggest problem here for both men and women is that these set roles in society are denying them choice.
Great summary of the actual facts, I do believe there is one other factor that wasn’t discussed though. Men are often paid more in a role because they used family as a negotiation tactic. I know of many men that became the sole income in their family and therefore had to pursue roles which paid more. This often leads to companies offering an increased salary to keep the individual, understanding that the increase is due to family financial pressure on the employee. I would assume there are also women who received increases in a similar fashion. This isn’t necessarily a bad factor, but it is worth understanding in the discussion as it is a valid reason why a man and a woman may be paid vastly different salaries for a similar position as the end income is split between 5 people, not 1.
Equality = 50/50 but there will always be a constant imbalance between things, if something is dominated by 70% of men it’s not a good thing and something has to be done but when women start being dominat 80% is seen as a good statistic and no imbalance is seen. I think we have to admit that equality is something that will never happen. Thanks Netflix for providing us with this article.
I used to apply for a backstage job back in my country and they told me they only want male as backstage crew (while I put all my previous experiences in related jobs on my resume, we even talked about those). They also suggest me to go front of house, which they only allow young female to work as FOH (a position only pay minimum by hour). The fact that those who interviewed my are both female are really sad.
This article showed that men and women start the job with “almost” the same payment, and after having kids the payment gap starts between the two because women are assumed (by society and employers) to be the caregiver. 8:82 this is the issue, we wanted this article to talk about the gap between men and women without having any children, why women are being paid with 96% of every dollar for men, this is the main question and this documentary did not answer it
There is great irony in the fact that Rwanda was used as a good example of women’s equality. They also say ‘Rwanda has one of the worst economies in the world’ directly after. A huge number of their men were genocided, so now women are a vast majority. As if that sort of society is one to admire, and as if women being paid better is worth the cost of hundreds of thousands of men. The fact that they focus on current women’s pay, and gloss over the fact that men were killed in huge numbers makes the reporters seem naïve and out of touch with reality.
Ah yes, so children affect the pay gap. It really is about being a mom vs being a woman. I think we women generally do not assert ourselves as much as men. But it mostly comes down to the delays due to being a mom. More often than not, the pressure is on the woman to follow gender norms. There are some pretty interesting points in this.
Unpopular opinion gender pay gap is misleading. Because women get payed less averagely does not mean for the same job. Different careers. More female breaks and men working more hours is the culprit. We need to empower women in the education system so they can reach higher in life and Men need to be responsible equally for hours work if both are full time workers.
Very good article. I can see fathers really being more loving and involved with their children because they have been allowed to share in all the wonderful stages of their children’s development. It will be much healthier for the family as a whole and society will be stronger for it. Well done, Netflix!
If there were truly a pay gap then business owners would fire all the men and just hire women so they could make more profit. You can’t just add up what men get paid and what women get paid and say there is a pay gap. That is dishonest and using fault statistics. To get the true statistic you must use the same job from the same state/area. Example would an engineer. To get an accurate statistic you would need to compare women engineers salary to men engineers salary. Also, due to cost of living a person would get paid more for the same job in California than they would in say Montana.
This is so misleading. The “gender wage gap” is really calculated by getting the median salary of all working men and women. Not even taking into account for work experience, work hours, not even the job itself. Different jobs make different salaries. If the gender pay gap really does exist why aren’t more companies hiring women if they can save 20% compared to men? It’s not that hard to transition your work demography to all women and you save a shit load of money.
Society doesn’t put the same pressure on women as they do as men. Idk why women think it’s great. It’s terrible. It’s constant anxiety. A mans worth is entirely in his ability to create income and if you fail you are useless. Women don’t have that pressure. They have societal safety nets. Men don’t get that luxury so most men look at jobs and careers as survival. It’s not about getting a better lifestyle for men. It’s about being able to exist in society as a real person. The pay gap is 99% a women’s issue. Men aren’t trying to put women down, we’re just trying to make it and we have more to lose
“Women are expected to raise children” that’s actually backwards. The vast vast majority of people, both men and women would LOVE to be able to stay home and raise their kids, but they recognize women are better at it so in a way men are willing to make the sacrifice to be away from their kids for longer for the sake of providing resaources due to the respect they have for the mother’s caregiving skill. It is raising the child that is the more prestigious and sought after occupation. It’s a disgraceful feminist misrepresentation to place a “career” as some peak of what people wish to do.
Turning 27 tomorrow. I out earn my partner, I have a college degree, he doesn’t. If we decide to have children we will make sure we can afford a nanny or sitter during the day so that after my maternity and his paternity leave ends, our child is safe at home with someone we trust. There’s nothing special about our situation, we just know that children and our careers are both important and that you don’t have to sacrifice either to get what you want if you know how to plan for it. But I realize most people don’t plan for children and that is also a problem.
The two biggest variables in pay are experience and location. A doctor in New York will be paid differently then a doctor In Oklahoma. This is why firefighters in cities get paid more then fire fighters in rural areas. A crane operator with 8 years of experience will be paid more then who has been for 2 years. But I agree something like the US military discriminates women for enlisting into certain jobs. But now if you have a kid that comes with a sacrifice whether that be the man or woman. As a man I would love to spend time with my kids while the woman comes home tired, with food on the table. But that would also hurt my pride when I tell my friends my wife makes the money.
The Rwandan case is interesting to me, because I have long seen the good side of bad things. Years back, I read a study about the gender makeup of CEOs and the top three were in the Caribbean and South America. And I immediately thought this must come from slavery. For example, on my island, about 95% of women are black and our women have worked for 300 years. I do not know a single woman in my generation or my mother’s that does not work. Obviously, slavery and genocide are horrific things, but sometimes they have an odd perk, here and there.
we have the same here is Sweden that the farther get a number of weeks with the child that the mother can’t take. And I have heard many couples complain about this as they don’t like the restriction. My uncle for example, when they got their kids, the mother was unemployed, so to use all the weeks they where given. Both HAD to be home. Also many couples CHOOSE to split it “uneven”. another relative I have. the mother had a job just like every other person, but the dad was an entrepreneur. And it is way more damaging being home for the company and income and career to be home when you have your own company. If the genders were the other way around, I am sure the farther would have been home much more then the mother. (because I know them very well). I just think the government should let the parents choose for them self. if you can’t agree on who is home and who is working, then you shouldn’t have had kids in the first place.
I don’t have an argument here to add but an interesting story. Do with it as you will. I work at a Fedex warehouse where we lift boxes. There are both nearly equal women and men that work there nowadays. Women frequently ask men such as me for help with heavy boxes. One day, one lady complained to me that there were men standing around or doing easy tasks like small boxes and bags while she was stuck with heavy boxes. Saying “I gotta do this and there’s men right there”. I said nothing and helped her. But I thought to myself and regretted not saying it, this is equality, you get paid the same, you do the same work. Usually the women are placed in easier work areas with smaller boxes, the same boxes that the women was complaining the men were working at. That is all. I’ve been thinking about it ever so often since. Also: I am aware that women do have a lesser ability to build muscle than men. But the only argument I will include in all of this is that the only way to build that muscle, as I did since I first started, is to lift those heavier boxes. It seems some women use that as an excuse to not have to do such work. Im also aware that this physical labor is not easily comparable to office work but I just thought it was worth mentioning.
I have seen things in corporate. my team lead wanted male employees coz that way he can make us work for an avg of 17-18 hrs per day and do long hours in office. We were harrassed and exploited, doing long hours for nearly one year till I left the team. Even my team lead was putting more hours than us coz he has a boss above him and a client with a high purse holding. The whole team’s health was having a serious toll on our bodies and psychology
A Woman can have kids and still have a job, the secret is balance. A good Man will understand that raising children is a job in itself and respect the sacrifice his Wife has made. There’s nothing wrong with having children and raising the next generation, raising good humans is more important than both of their jobs. There’s nothing wrong with filling your role in society and your family, and anyone saying it’s wrong is a fool.
as a woman, who wants to be a mother, i am my own boss. I work for myself, – make my own money and I am building my business. it’s my time, my money, my skills. I don’t need to rely on a pay-gap and I can work from home and still be with my children. The industry is expanding – we don’t all need to work at a corporation. Also, it depends on the COUPLE. if the mother wants to work full time and the father wants to raise the kids – then she can fight for a raise and he can work less. There is nothing wrong with a mother wanting to work less and be at home with the baby more. as a woman, I personally think it’s more important for a mother to be a mother first, and an employee second. Fathers provide – i understand. But like i said, it’s between the couples, there always has to be a balance! i would never encourage women or men to prioritize their jobs over their children. it really depends on the provider vs the caregiver. and then you have single mothers also. idk, there is a lot of money in the world, hiring anyone is a risk so i don’t understand why we cannot just treat salaries as a nonbias number, depending on worth brought to the position and the need of the employee. but who knows, I’m only 25, what do i know right?
You have to compare apples to apples when it comes to pay gaps. Women and men, by in large, don’t occupy the same fields, I.e. nursing and teaching are predominantly female, but men tend to occupy 90+ % of the high-risk, high-paying jobs, like working oil rigs and mining. So yes, maternity leave is a part of the gap, but I agree with a lot of people on here: there’s more to the conversation. Saying there’s a pay gap as a blanketed statement without discussing this information is a little misleading.
Yeah, but instead of the potential money you lose on being a mom, you spend more time with your children. That’s worth all my money to be honest. That’s literally why I go to work. To care for my family. If you value money more than you value your motherhood, then you shouldn’t have become a mother. You’re not being penalized for being a mother. I see it as being rewarded. Because the levels of responsibilties on a career-oriented person also increases with time. I would much rather shift those responsibilities and time to home to my kids.
So you actually found a logical and legitimate explanation for the difference in earnings between men and women… And somehow women are still victims and are being penalized for their gender. People make choices. If you want to be a CEO as a woman, focus on your career. If you want to have kids and especially if you want to stay home with the kids for any period of time, you will not be able to advance in your career the same way. The reason why this shouldn’t matter is because if you picked a husband who is worth a damn, he will work hard to provide for the family. Why are we always putting men and women against each other? It’s the most destructive propaganda for our society.
Why is it not mandatory for women AND men to take a paternity leave and split the time 50/50? I think this could be a way to tackle both: the outdated role of the women in childcare as well as the gender pay gap. Both genders would have the same “disadvantages”. And a father (and mother) can only not go into paternity/maternity leave with a good reason or sth. like that. This would even everything out on BOTH sides.
Well I rather stay with my kids than work. It’s not like investing more time in my career makes me happier than investing time with my kids. My wife feels the same way. She doesn’t want to be away from the kids. But we both know that we need to financially provide for our kids too. In those situations, I think it should be the man that sacrifices and goes to work more. If I was already rich enough to be financially secure without working, you don’t think Id rather just stay home and spend time with my kids? Work sucks, even if you do enjoy your job. I couldn’t force my wife to work more even if I wanted to.
they aren’t paid less its actually illegal to pay someone less because of their gender race etc its just basing the same job and pay not how many hours they work or where they work or what specifically they do in that job just cause its the same job some will work harder and better than others across america. Edit: The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 prevents this “pay gap” women keep using for arguments when its just misread the pay gap is just an overall comparison from gender to job they dont dig deep and see whos working harder or has better quality of work etc.
if we don’t consider the single moms, in a normal family most of financial stress is on father and not all of the mans but mostly they work hard as possible to make money for their family. i think there should be a equal pay rate for a job but there should be diffrent opportunity between diffrent humans like a single mom should have more opportunity to get hire than a normal mom who is not single and her husband have a job also. it’s my personal comment …
I was glad that they pointed out that the motherhood seems to be the crucial issue (the show showed that women without kids were making 96%). But then the show shows Rwanda’s example as a success story, which has nothing to do with the motherhood problem (basically a bunch of men died and a lot more women started working). This is very inconsistent message — the show should have dig deeper into the motherhood issue.
So many comments from people who would rather just ignore the problem or blame it on women’s “choices.” It’s super easy to tell yourself, “women have lower pay because they just choose lower-paying jobs, so we aren’t being sexist if we ignore the problem.” Because sure, that’s exactly how it works. It’s because of individual people’s choices that people of one sex or one race end up doing certain jobs. All your grocery cashiers are women, and all the grocery managers are men? That’s not structural sexism, it’s just that women don’t want those jobs! Yet I personally know more than one woman with a lot of grocery experience who has applied for management jobs only to see them give the position to a man with virtually zero experience in the business. Or “all the managers are men, but that’s only because women with family responsibilities can’t meet the demands of the job. We like our tradition of supporting structural sexism by designing jobs that can only be done by people without family responsibilities. So goodbye to you, if you have to spend time taking care of children or disabled family members! Only the selfish need apply!”
Women want equality of rights and privileges, not duties and obligations. For example when it comes to the military draft less than half of women are in favor or including them in a military draft.… What happened to wanting to be equal? “Public support for such a change has divided sharply along gender lines. In a 2016 Rasmussen poll, 61% of men favored extending draft registration to everyone in the 18-to-25 age cohort, while only 38% of women supported doing so.”
If you don’t want to take care of the child then don’t give birth. It is equally criminal to not take care of and nurture a child than to not let a person take care of and nurture a child. The idea of judging someone’s worth from their economic produce is totally wrong in the first place. If you are doing a part in creating and nurturing the next generation, you are entitled for respect and reverence, even more than someone who brings in economic produce. It is also important to note that the gender of this person has nothing to do with it.
The biggest issue with this topic is that people don’t actually look at WHY women get paid less. One of the largest factors is because they simply work less hours on average than men. It’s a simple fact and an easy factor to look at given that literally every company keeps track of hours worked. Both Bob and Jill make $20 an hour. Before overtime kicks in, they both earn $800 that week. Say that at their company they get 2x pay if they work overtime. Let’s say Jill worked 0 hours over time, and Bob worked only 2 hours overtime. Jill made $800 that week and Bob made $888, so $88 more dollars than Jill. Therefore, Jill made 90% of what Bob did. You can see how easily you can come to women making 90% of what men make just by men working 2 measly hours more a week. This really isn’t that hard unless you can’t understand basic math or basic statistical analysis.
surprisingly good movie, it thought it will be the usual propaganda piece but it was well written and made good points but which begs the question is the gender pay gap due to a natural inclination for men to do all the work and that women are better at nurturing children. In other words, we are literally fighting against our own biological purpose. Corona though
When you control for confounding variables such as education, hours worked, profession, continuous years worked, age, etc. then the wage gap nearly disappears. What is also funny is they only go back to the 50s when talking about women working, but before the 50s there were more women in professional occupations prior to the 1950s. The increase in the gap correlates directly with the increase in the number if children born. Read Thomas Sowell’s Economic Facts and Fallacies
Spare me, this disparity started b/c typically A) The man was viewed as the breadwinner, he was paid enough to support a family ( As the world has evolved with equal rights and single mothers with 3 different baby daddies), B) If a man asked women out, dutch treat was not common place, the man was expected to p/u the check With inflation, equal rights, it’s is no longer the norm. Unfortunately, there is still a gap/disparity, the needle has moved and the gap/disparity has narrowed greatly.
My dad did some of these things and even worked home to rear me cause he could. So there are some opportunities business-wise himself that he could have missed that I didn’t know at the moment, that I grew to appreciate more. I think this is lopped sided since that could be pretty much the case any parent regardless of gender could be missing a job opportunity in order to be involved with their kids.
There is Sooooo much they dont talk about …these statistics of women make 75 cents on the dollar (or whatever the ammount is) are all based on yearly income …. why ? Wouldnt a better comparison be based on hourly rate? (After all hourly rate is a pretty strong indicator of what ur time is worth) Why are u comparing yearly rates of income? Ur yearly rate of income will flucuate dramatically with time spent working. Here is a few other things that effect the wage gap that arent discussed here, men are more likely to move for work(which often comes with a bonus), men are more likely to take high risk jobs (military, off shore drilling or fishing underwater welding etc etc(which pay higher because of the risk)). Men average 1-2hrs more work per weak which (often) gets paid out as overtime. Men on average are slightly more interested in things and women slightly more interested in ppl this encourages trends like male engineers technichious mechanics etc and female nurses teachers care providers etc. An engineer that designs a product can mass produce it and profit off that in a way that a care giver can never mass produce the care they provide. The average age of a male in the work force is 1-2yrs older then the average female. Combined with the fact that average wage trends upwards with age should we not expect the average male to make slightly more money? I know its an old right wing counter arguement but its got a point. If a company could get away with paying women 15-25% less then it pays men.
The lady in pink almost touched on the big issue there that I feel holds a bigger stake in why. Time off work. In places I’ve worked females tend to take more time off then males (please note not all women and some men also take a lot of time off) this then in turn when rosters are been done works negativity in the favour of the person taking time off as the bosses don’t think in a matter of equal hours but who will best cover the hours needed . Then go with that you look at a lot of ladies are working in casual or part time positions where taking days off and getting a reputation for doing so could mean shifts removal or just plain not getting a chance of promoting up and you’re starting to see how this has happened.
absolutely despise who feminists think that husbands and wives are competing against one another. It’s a bad thing the husband is more successful (work-wise) than his wife. The husband, or wife, who decides to keep working is working so their partner can stay home and raise the children (the more important task).
This is great. It would have also been nice to see a discussion about the affect of the wage gap over 10-20 years (while the women is caregiving children), limiting her ability to work, impacts her retirement. The decrease ability to work, limits her ability to save for retirement. This is why women are more likely to age into poverty.
The fact is, Men are EXPECTED to be the bread winners, they are EXPECTED to risk their lives more, and they are EXPECTED to be dispensable. The person who goes up to the arctic for mining oil or minerals in freezing temperatures easily earns 6 figures and is always a man. The people who go to the treacherous arctic seas to fish for lobsters and king crabs are almost always going to be men. Men are much more likely to fly away from home on pursuit of business ventures and meetings. Men are much MUCH more likely to be killed on the job. Men work more hours. Men work more years. It would be total sexist crime for society to pay women “the same” on ultimate figures just for the sake of “making genders equal” without taking into account of all the things I mentioned above
This is a good attempt, but still highly ideology distorted. Far more single mothers? No shit when the overwhelming numbers of family courts give the the women all custody rights over the children and hardly any to the fathers. How would you be a single father if you don’t even get a chance to be one? Also giving a job to somebody you sympathize with IS NOT discrimination. Otherwise the same is true for a woman giving a job to another woman. Any person would naturally give an important job rather to somebody he or she trusts and trust is built up by socializing. Calling this discrimination is another distorted argumentation of feminist ideology, whose goal is to divide men and women ideologically.
childeren is your own choise, that parents make the choise that the mom is more at home for the kids is the choise of that family here in europe there already lots of benefits and financial support for couples with childeren i am a single man from belgium, i pay a lot of taxes and have almost no benefits when you going to pay women for staying with the kids, gess who is going to pay the bill, yeah people without childeren why we never discus the real pay gap, the gap between the ones without and with childeren a pay gap not in earnings, but a pay gap caused by very high taxes for one group in order to support the other group and like i said, childeren is your own choise, your own choise in an overpopulated world
The article informs us that the pay gap is amongst moms and men. Women without children make about the same as men. That means as the pay gap shrinks, so does the birth rate. When the pay gap was big in US (1950-1955), the crude birth rate was at 24.4 per 1,000 people. In 2020 the birth rate was at 10.9. The pay gap is shrinking. Oh, and the death rate in 2020 was 10.6.
Choices, choices, choices. Everything you do in life involves a choice. And those choices have consequences…..for both men AND women. No one is holding you back. Society is not holding you back. Stop bitching about being a victim while comparing yourself to other people, and worry about yourself! I am a woman. Have 2 sisters. All 3 of us have kids. All 3 of us make more money than our husbands because we chose good careers. We chose good jobs with good pay and benefits. We chose to have kids at the right time. People blaming society for their problems need to step back and look in the mirror and ask, “what choices could I have made different or better?” Start with yourself! But the left doesn’t view people as individuals, but as members of groups, which is insane and will result in nobody being held responsible or accountable for their actions.
LOL, women ARE paid the same as men if you include maternity leave. The market has responded perfectly to the maternity benefits it is forced to pay to women. A man will not cost your company the fees a woman will so hence men are more valuable to a company. The market always makes its impartial, pure and perfect evaluation. Adam Smith’s invisible hand is all knowing and all correct.
Don’t see too many women building houses, working in sewers, up on power lines, fixing cars, hauling truck loads, plumbing and welding metals. Most women seem to prefer cushy jobs which DON’T require a lot of physical labor. But these jobs typically don’t pay as well as the previous ones listed. This is very disingenuous. This is why men don’t want to vote Democrat.
Yes, women do more child rearing and work in the home than their partners after children are born. Yes this exists even when both partners work full time. What they fail to mention is that even full time mothers cut back on hours much of the time after having children. So they may have been full time before working 45-50 hrs a week, but they cut that back to 35-40 hours after having a child. This is a decision they make. They don’t have to but they do. Men on the other hand usually increase their hours after having a child. Men have that pressure to provide. These are decisions that young families make. One partner reducing hours to do more child rearing, and one partner increasing hours to try to bring in more money. Generally it’s a woman focusing more on child rearing and the man working more in the office. And the vast majority of the time it’s the woman making this decision for both of them. So please, stop trying to blame men for this issue.
So if women make that much less than men why aren’t women suing these companies. I mean Seriously if whomen really made less then men you would be seeing companies being sued left and right, but you don’t. Why??? Because its illegal to pay someone less based on gender. But they would rather juat complain and b.i.t.c.h about something that doesn’t exist.
World wide women make less then men but in the USA women make equal pay, complain and are actually 50% more likely to quit a job. About 90% Of men that get a divorce have to pay alimony and child support. Why would you need paymens from men if youre equal to men. Get a job. Women talk about equal rights. Lets talk about it. I have one eye I still had to apply for selective service. Why don’t women go about applying for selective service
Why would the owner of a company pay less to a woman that has higher skills. If discrimination in the free market exist, than the owner of a company will pay the price for its discrimination. If a woman brings value to a company she will be compensated accordingly. No one controls the free market. The free market is not racist because its not controlled by a single person
the reality is that in most modern countries women are paid the exact same, BUT they simply don’t want to do the same jobs as men; they don’t want pure equality- just look at any engineering/IT/science/construction. These jobs pay really well yet almost no women want to do them, and the choice is made long before having a child. The result is the jobs that are left are usually jobs that both men and women can do, while at the same time you cannot expect men to do these hard fields while raising a whole family.
I would love to see women get paid more. But I would also love to see women stop expecting men to make more than them and support them. Like how can we push women into the workforce…. Cut off men from MILLIONS of jobs. And then still expect Men to carry the entire weight in the family? Men being literally divorced because his job was sent overseas. Mens jobs being under valued. Men are willing to take care of others the more he makes. But women become more selfish the more they make. It boggles my mind.
You can make any assumption based on any gap in gender bias. The fact that a disproportionate amount of men are incarcerated in the US shows that there is a problem in our society. If this argument holds about gender pay gaps, then we should lock more women up and have actual tough on crimes that women commit. Any feminist will say a sexist remark on how men commit more crimes and maybe that is right but women commit shoplifting and maybe we need to be tougher on that crime. Because when you take into account those men incarcerated, the pay gap likely shrinks down on an average. But I think gender equality based on something that someone has to do or has to achieve is flawed because this argument should be flawed. Because we all know what corporations will do. They will simply lower men’s pay instead of paying women more. Instead of seeing the obscene amount that CEOs make and go hey maybe that should be used to pay their employees a quarterly excess bonus. Bonuses are key.
Some facts : – when a men works make a family and that’s makes the society get stronger and reacher and stable – when a woman works it helps it self in fact if it’s married at most cases that mariage is not healthy especially when she works in a workplace full of men also a working women get separated from their children’s what makes a gap in their life that need to be filled and this broke the family stability in the society . Now this is not mentioned they think if the salary were the same everything will be fine they don’t see the whole picture … If you came till here I hope your safe and thanks you for your time😋
to many ladies out there, just stop getting in the relationship, where the job of raising a child and doing housework is on you just stop choosing the easiest path, and then complaining about the discrimination just stop acting like clowns, chatting, gossiping about other people, instead of focusing on your own self-improvement just stop choosing stuff like art, dancing etc. And try exploring for example science and engineering WHY DO YOU THINK PEOPLE DON’T TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY?! BECAUSE YOU PRESENT YOURSELF LIKE THAT IN SOCIETY! STOP LOOKING UP AT MEN, AND LOOK AT YOURSELF INSTEAD! work on yourself first, explore this world, be curious, develop stuff, learn new things, learn how to communicate, make connections with right people why some of you so desperately want to become a housewife, which is okay but in my opinion is quite pathetic STOP ACTING DUMB, AND TRY BEING SERIOUS FOR ONCE Note: I am not talking about “all” women, because there are hopefully plenty of them who are have a brilliant mindset, outstanding knowledge, which I truly respect. But for those who are brainwashed into thinking that men are better, or whatever all those idiots say, just please STOP EMBARRASSING other non-pathetic women who don’t deserve being treated like unqualified trash.
Constitution: 10. “Equal rights to Rwandans and between women and men without prejudice……” “women are represented are granted at least thirdy per cent of posts in decision making organs” Well then, shouldn’t also have been a paragraph like”men are represented are granted at least thirdy per cent of posts in decision making organs”cent of posts in decision making organs”??? I admire how people ALWAYS understands “equality” under the acts of giving women more rights
Why Does the School Day End Two Hours Before the Workday? This mismatch creates a child-care crisis between 3 and 5 p.m. that has parents scrambling for options. On the whole, conflicting school and work schedules cost the U.S. economy $55 billion in lost productivity each year, in large part due to parents (mostly women) who scale back employment and the lost productivity when parents have to take off work during school closures. “We often think about this as a problem every family faces, and it just happens over and over again in this systemic way: The mother cuts back on her hours for when school is closed,” said Catherine Brown, an education-policy researcher at the Center for American Progress. “Why do we have a wage gap? Partially it’s because of this, I believe.” Also, If you look at how caregiving responsibilities erode a woman’s career, it takes a long time. It’s about not accepting the job that’s going to push you further in your career, because it’s going to conflict with your family. It’s about taking part-time work so that you get more time at home. It’s about choosing the job that has the most flexibility. It’s about choosing the job with the shortest commute. Those are the trade-offs. And those trade-offs end up giving them less opportunity, fewer opportunities for promotions or raises. That’s why you see much bigger gender gaps for women by age 50 than you saw at age 30. These things just happen slowly over time. Even though the pandemic has come as a big crisis and we saw the labor market crater, I think the impact of the child care crisis on women’s outcomes is going to be felt over the next decade.
I think it’s hard to truly say there are 3x single moms then there are dads without recognizing that family court has made much of that decision for us. And that the dynamic of men earning as much money as they can, while women take care of the kids, is being enforced at the judicial level. As well as the idea that the original choice was still made, the fact that the two couldn’t keep the union together doesn’t necessarily mean that the outcome has to make sense. The adults went back on their choice to promise a future for each other, there are consequences for that.
Our instincts: “Being the caretaker is the mom’s job.” “Being the provider is the dad’s job.” I don’t see any inequalities here. When a dad have children, they NEED to earn even more for the families, it’s not because it’s men’s freedom. Don’t forget the dad is paying the mom, and the mom’s nuturing for the dad. If you insist men being the provider, protector and a dad, being the house wife, nurturer, and a mom is the least you can do.
Well all these factors will become obsolete soon (and I welcome these changes!!) Female college students already outnumber male students. The main differentiator that pushes the pay and career back for women is children – I agree with the article. And that’s why soooo many women choose career first and either a) postpone having children until late 30s-early 40s or b) decide not to have children at all! And I don’t blame them even a bit. If men are selfish and do not help in raising kids, if they do not take paternity leaves and career gaps, why women should be the ones sacrificing their careers?? They are already giving a gift of live (with all those health complications that may arise from the pregnancy and child birth). Why dads don’t have to make that choice, between career and kids? If I were a woman I’d say: if men don’t take equal responsibility in raising kids and taking a paternity leave to help, then screw this: I choose career, Im not a child bearing machine! Or – I freeze my eggs and build my career in my 20s and 30s, build income, and then in my 40s – get a blue eyed tall Danish sperm donor and have my own kids on my own time when I have enough income to hire a nanny. I don’t even need a man
I really don’t care who is working for me as long as someone is not becoming my headache and hinders the productivity of team, applies to both men and women. But if I fire women and keep men then I hope I’ll not be called mysoginsitic person and that scares me a lot so I prefer men over women. Society is going crazy:/
Seems like the problem is more about paid maternity and paternity leave than gender discrimination. Also affordable childcare for those in the middle class and below. This issue has been sold to us in an incredibly misleading way by politicians and teachers in schools/universities. I recall just 4 years ago trying to explain to a Poli Sci professor that the gender pay gap couldn’t be from overt sexism because there have been laws against that since the 70s and the employer would be sued.
I am a woman and I chose to not get married or have kids …but I am also discriminated against or thought of as incompetent.. Also aside from maternity leave .the pregnant female colleagues also generate sympathy during their working days also ..so that all their work also gets dumped on me … Besides in many government institutions your promotion is based on number of years you spend at a certain designation and not how you spend them ie. Nobody looks at your daily hours of work or productivity
Pay is and should be based on merit. It is ridiculous to think that you could even begin to measure a pay gap between any groups, male vs female, black vs white, gay vs straight etc etc. It cannot accurately be done unless & until every single persons pay, experience, age, education, traits etc are entered & tracked and then reporting by industry & even company. Does no one see that some things are just natural and should be the case. Also, men are expected, if not required, to work full time while the woman is allowed to take time off to stay home & raise their children. Who exactly is benefiting from this and who isn’t. It sounds like the man/father is the one at a disadvantage & is the one sacrificing.
i really don’t know what’s so hard to understand about all of this, Your performance mostly determines your paycheck, for example, two males who joined at the same time with the same starting salary but one of them start getting paid higher than the other one.. why is that? performance and contribution to the company is what determines your paycheck.
Fiza Zulekha “Dylan Berg first of all you need understand that society should understand people and an individual not as women and men. The system should allow people to make choices according to needs and individuality not by the what one should do or not do.” 1. We can do both 2. People like the ones in these documentaries are the ones CONSTANTLY putting us into superficial boxes like gender, race, etc. 3. The system does allow people to make decisions according to their own needs and individuality. We are free to make our own choices based on our wants and needs. No one is forcing you otherwise. If you let what other people say you should or shouldn’t do effect your decisions, you’re an idiot. And if you’re so insecure that these comments make you incapable of making your own decisions without the government or anyone else’s help, then you’re just hopeless.
People should be made aware that salary and benefits/perks differ between a Part-Time, Contractual, and a Regular job, Number of work hours rendered, Overtime Work, The difference between a normal/safe and a dangerous job, Location, Indoor/Outdoor, The number of years an employee has been working for the same firm (senior vs. rookie), Merits/Credentials, skillset, level of expertise and actual years of hands-on experience. The difference between male and female benefits (e.g.: Maternity Leave vs. Paternity Leave), Company-specific bonuses, Performance-based appraisal or bonuses, etc.. These are just several factors that determine and differentiate salary and benefits/perks across different fields: Science, Technology, Engineering, Advertising, Real Estate, Journalism, Construction, Mining (Coal, Oil, Precious and Rare Metals), Education, Farming, Pharmaceutical/Healthcare/Medicine, etc..–You get the point. You also need to consider the company/firm/jobsite itself: competitiveness of salary, size, investors, job demand/investment profitability, geographical location (income tax may differ), state of economy, etc.. You may have the same job title but it does not mean you will always have the same salary/benefit. e.g: Actor (famous with emmy awardee) vs. Actor (slightly famous but no award) Anyone who has/had their own business/firm, or has/had real work experience, or just did research and has sound logic would know these case-to-case factors and should not have a difficult time understanding.
It is eaenings gap not wage gap. Also, men ON AVERAGE tend to work for more time and they take more risks. There are many people who explain this topic. It’s not the fault of any gender but of the system. Each gender has benefits and disadvantages. To answer those type of questions we need much time of discussion and debate.
It wasn’t the change in maternity/paternity leave that reduced the wage gap in Iceland. Maternity leave has always been a very small part of the wage gap. At the end of the day a woman is only taking a few months off from her career. That’s not enough to significantly derail her career. Rather it’s the decisions women make AFTER they come back to work. By reducing their hours. If you’re not working overtime and taking on extra projects, you’re not going to earn promotions. Iceland has reduced the gap by punishing ambition. They’ve taken steps to reduce options for overtime and penalize employees who work beyond a certain # of hours. This has reduced the ability of the most ambitious men to fulfil their ambitions. And at the end of the day, a large chunk of the wage gap is due to the top 1% of overly ambitious, competitive men. If you remove their ability to capitalize on being ambitious, you will cut the wage gap. Of course, now a lot of women are complaining that they can’t find enough ambitious, driven men who earn good money. You can’t make this shit up.