Briffault’s Law is a principle that applies to all relationships, regardless of the type of relationship. It states that the female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. If the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. This idea asserts that women’s choices significantly influence the success or failure of social reform.
Briffault’s Law is a social theory proposed by anthropologist Robert Briffault that attempts to explain the dynamics of relationships, particularly in romantic partnerships. The law states that the female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.
However, Briffault clarifies that this rule applies only to nonhuman animals and not to humans. There is no analogy between the animal family and the patriarchal human family. Briffault’s Law contradicts basic principles of resource allocation and cost vs. benefit, as both males and females determine the conditions of the animal family. In any relationship, the party that derives the most benefit dictates the terms of the relationship.
In conclusion, Briffault’s Law suggests that in any relationship, the party that derives the most benefit dictates the terms of the relationship. This principle has led men to coin the expression “if you are a married man, it is only because your wife still finds you useful”. By recognizing the power of women’s choices in shaping social reform, Briffault’s Law serves as a valuable tool for understanding the dynamics of relationships and the impact of gender roles, family structures, and reproductive rights on social dynamics.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| Briffault’s Law: Does it Apply to Human Relationships? | Briffault’s law states: “The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no … | e-counseling.com |
| Briffault’s law: A relationship can’t exist between a man and a … | Briffault’s law: The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from … | theordinaryman1.medium.com |
| Does Briffault’s law apply to humans? | Briffault’s Law states: “The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no … | quora.com |
📹 What is Briffaults Law?
What is Briffaults Law and how it applies to relationships How You Can Support My Work PayPal Donation: …
Is It OK To Avoid My Inlaws?
Navigating relationships with in-laws can be challenging, and many couples find themselves needing to establish boundaries. Some opt for radical measures like moving away, while others simply manage their attendance at family gatherings or take some distancing time—it’s crucial that both partners are aligned in these decisions. Recognizing signs of toxic in-laws is paramount. If you ever think, "I hate my in-laws," you’re not alone. Communication with your partner is key; discussing your feelings can help you both address these challenges together.
Consider making a list of the reasons for your frustrations, and be vigilant for behaviors that include overstepping boundaries. If you feel that your in-laws are creating tension, it's perfectly acceptable to limit your contact with them. You do not owe them your time, especially if their actions belittle you. Seeking support from your spouse while calmly establishing limits is essential. Ultimately, it's fine to not forge a close relationship with your in-laws; maintaining a peaceful dynamic is what matters.
Even in unavoidable situations, stay focused on your spouse and your relationship. Open, honest communication can safeguard your connection and promote healthy boundaries. If the situation becomes abusive, seek help immediately.
Who Counts As A Close Family Member?
Close family members typically include a person's spouse, children, parents, and siblings, forming what is defined as immediate family. This concept varies across legal, cultural, and personal contexts, often impacting inheritance, immigration, and workplace rights. While immediate family generally encapsulates parents, siblings, spouses, and children, it may also include grandparents, grandchildren, and others connected through birth, adoption, or marriage, like aunts, uncles, and cousins.
The specific inclusion of extended relations, such as cousins or nieces and nephews, can vary by circumstance, including legal definitions that outline immediate relatives as those closely related. Employers may adopt differing interpretations of immediate family for policies and benefits. Overall, immediate family is crucial for understanding rights and responsibilities connected to family relationships, recognizing the term as encompassing the closest relatives essential for various personal and legal matters.
Distinctions often exist between personal perceptions and legal definitions of immediate family, leading to varied interpretations in different situations. Close family is foundational to personal and legal frameworks, reflecting the significance of familial bonds.
Does Briffault'S Law Apply To All Relationships?
Briffault's Law posits that women have control over whether a relationship occurs, suggesting that women dictate the terms of romantic involvement, even if men initiate courtship. This principle is attributed to British surgeon and anthropologist Robert Briffault, who claimed that "the female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family." While some may find this law applicable primarily to heterosexual relationships, it can also extend to all relationship types, including same-sex relationships, highlighting overarching power dynamics.
Briffault’s Law is not necessarily transactional nor does it imply that all relationships function this way but rather offers a perspective on relational exchanges. It does not account for the full spectrum of human relationships influenced by societal norms, individual preferences, or cultural values. The law's assertion that a woman must derive some benefit from the relationship before it progresses raises discussions about commitment versus casual interactions.
In essence, while some believe in the validity of Briffault’s Law, recognizing that all relationships involve exchanges, others argue against its generalization, indicating variability in human dynamics. Ultimately, Briffault's Law provides a framework for understanding relationship complexities but remains open to interpretation and critique across different contexts.
Does Briffault'S Law Ring True?
Briffault's Law posits that individuals assess potential relationships based on perceived benefits and power dynamics, suggesting that relationships are contingent on the balance of advantages each party receives. Initially proposed by Robert Briffault, the law states that females, not males, determine the conditions of relationships, emphasizing that the continuation of any relationship depends on whether the benefits still outweigh the costs. Critics argue that this theory oversimplifies the complexity of modern human connections, though it provides valuable insights into relationship dynamics.
It highlights the truth that, while in a partnership, both parties must feel they are gaining value; otherwise, a relationship is likely to falter. This law is particularly relevant in understanding why many women prefer commitment and marriage over casual arrangements. Briffault's Law extends beyond animal behavior to human social interactions, igniting discussions on its applicability. Essentially, it indicates that the party deriving the most benefit from a relationship often dictates its terms and can choose to end it if those benefits diminish. In summary, Briffault's Law serves as a framework for analyzing relationship dynamics, reminding us that mutual benefit is crucial for sustaining partnerships.
Are Ex In-Laws Considered Immediate Family?
Immediate Family Members refer to an individual’s closest relatives, encompassing children, stepchildren, parents, stepparents, siblings, spouses, former spouses, qualified domestic partners, and in-laws, including mother-in-law and father-in-law. This definition extends to adoptive relationships as well. The context can dictate whether in-laws are considered immediate family, especially in legal situations like healthcare or family leave policies.
Legally, immediate family typically includes parents, siblings, spouses, and children. Some definitions incorporate grandparents and grandchildren. Although ex-spouses may not always be considered immediate family, those who maintain a cooperative relationship for child-rearing might be included. While in-laws are often recognized as part of the broader extended family, specific legal frameworks or insurance policies can vary in their interpretations of immediate family. Immediate family definitions can also influence eligibility for bereavement leave and other benefits, highlighting the nuances of familial relationships within legal contexts.
Do I Have To Be Around My In-Laws?
In navigating relationships with toxic in-laws, it's crucial to maintain drama and tension at a minimum for the sake of your spouse and children. Even though you create a new family through marriage, your in-laws significantly contribute to that union. Regular criticism from in-laws regarding your parenting, lifestyle, or appearance can undermine your self-esteem and increase marital strain. Recognizing signs of toxicity is essential. Effective strategies include communicating with your partner, avoiding contentious topics, and establishing clear boundaries.
Accepting your in-laws as they are can help alleviate personal offenses. If you find your in-laws difficult to deal with, consulting your spouse is vital. You might feel the urge to distance yourself, as some in-laws can attempt to create division between partners. If they resist boundaries, it’s essential to stand firm and choose what’s best for your family. Many experience challenges with in-laws, and understanding is key since family dynamics vary.
Setting limits on visit duration can maintain your sanity, and conflict with in-laws is common over trivial issues. It's important to engage politely and respectfully while discussing disagreements calmly. Ultimately, one doesn’t need to like their in-laws for a successful marriage; alignment with your spouse regarding these boundaries is what matters most. Aim for a balance where your marriage remains private while respecting necessary familial connections.
Are In Laws Legally Family?
Family Member encompasses spouse, father, mother, child, and in-laws (father-in-law, mother-in-law, daughter-in-law, son-in-law). The legal status of in-laws varies by jurisdiction and contract, with some recognizing them as close relatives, while others exclude them. The term "in-law" has roots in canon law from the 14th century, indicating these individuals become relatives through marriage. Legal definitions of "immediate family" typically include a person's parents, spouse, and children, but there is no universal definition for in-laws in the U.
S. In some legal contexts, such as healthcare decisions or family leave, in-laws may be regarded as immediate family. Laws regarding in-law relationships differ globally, particularly concerning rights like inheritance. While some view in-laws as part of their extended family, the feelings toward in-laws can vary greatly—some individuals embrace them as family, while others see them merely as relatives through marriage.
The dynamics surrounding in-laws reflect evolving societal norms and legal recognition of family structures, complicating definitions of family further. Generally, in-laws are seen as part of the extended family, which includes all relatives beyond the immediate family unit.
What Is Briffault'S Law?
Briffault's Law, posited by British anthropologist Robert Briffault, asserts that in nonhuman animal and human relationships, "the female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family." According to this law, associations occur only when the female perceives a benefit from the male; if no benefit exists, the association does not take place. This concept implies that women hold the primary decision-making power in romantic relationships, as they dictate the terms based on their perceived gains.
In simpler terms, while men may initiate courtship, it is ultimately women who decide whether a relationship will be formed. Briffault's Law highlights that the dynamics of sexual selection and relationship formation greatly depend on the female's perspective and interests. This principle extends beyond its biological implications, entering sociological discussions regarding the nature of romantic partnerships.
Critics of the law suggest it might reflect an oversimplified view of human relationships, suggesting that it frames women as inherently self-serving and men as mere participants responding to female desires.
Overall, Briffault's Law emphasizes the significant role women play in determining relationship dynamics and underscores the concept that no romantic engagement can happen unless the female partner perceives a benefit from it. This theory raises intriguing questions about power, choice, and the motivations in male-female interactions.
Does Briffault'S Law Make Sense In Evolutionary Terms?
Briffault's Law, proposed by Robert Briffault, is a social theory that explores relationship dynamics, particularly in romantic partnerships. It posits that women determine the conditions of relationships, suggesting that men's interest initiates courtship, but women ultimately dictate terms. While Briffault's Law holds some evolutionary merit, it can be perceived as superficial and overly simplistic.
It implies a clear cost-benefit analysis in relationships, especially during dating, where perceived benefits dictate continuity. This theory has garnered attention in social science and is often linked to evolutionary psychology, which asserts that behaviors are influenced by evolutionary factors.
Despite its popularity, critics argue that Briffault's Law is inadequate and overly broad, lacking substantial meaning when applied to human relationships, particularly because it does not account for the complexity of individual choices or the diverse motivations women may have. Furthermore, applying the law to human behavior relies on outdated biological assumptions about sexual dimorphism and mate competition.
Critics emphasize that while it attempts to explain power dynamics in relationships, its implications for contemporary feminist movements are limited. Ultimately, Briffault's Law has sparked discussion on the nature of relationships, yet its applicability to human interactions remains contentious.
Is Briffault'S Law Based On Gender Roles?
Briffault's Law, proposed by Robert Briffault, is a sociological theory concerning the dynamics of romantic relationships, stating that "the female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family." This law highlights that women's choices significantly influence the success of relationships and asserts that females associate with males primarily when they perceive benefits from the relationship.
Although it focuses on heterosexual dynamics, critics argue that it is based on outdated gender roles and is inherently heteronormative, as it fails to account for same-sex relationships or those that do not conform to traditional gender expectations.
In contemporary society, many individuals reject the notion that women are more nurturing or relationship-oriented than men. While Briffault's Law is relevant to discussions on gender roles, family structures, and reproductive rights, its relevance in modern contexts remains contentious. Additionally, it does not inherently promote sexism; rather, it observes a social dynamic where female choices dictate relationship outcomes.
Critics highlight that the law’s perspective is limited and may not apply universally, emphasizing the need for broader inclusivity in understanding relational dynamics. Ultimately, Briffault’s Law outlines a framework that encourages a re-evaluation of traditional views on gender and relationships.
📹 New family laws redefine relationships
VICTORIA — As of Monday the province is redefining the common-law relationship. The changes are part of major shake-up to the …
Briffault’s Law I read and learned about 10 years ago. He nailed it!! I understand it as being; “A woman will have no association with a man whom she doesn’t benefit from, including your wife or girlfriend.”….and….”Loyalty means absolutely nothing to a woman who isn’t benefiting from a relationship.”
A good test to see if a girl is all about the money is to ask her what kind of wedding she would like to have… I have noticed these girls that want an elaborate wedding and honeymoon are the ones that take the guys to the cleaners when the marriage ends. If she tells you she wants a small simple wedding and a cheap honeymoon than she probably won’t be materialistic. A simple girl will usually stay simple. Of course, there’s always an exception to the rule. But that goes for a lot of things in life. Most likely those girls will stay with you if you hit a financial drop.
5:45 – “All her husband wanted to do was when he came home from work was to be with the family, with the kids and with her, and be a father.” – That’s really sad, but it’s also really common. Also, this is precisely the reason why no-fault divorce laws are such a BAD idea! Thanks, Reagan! These laws incentivize women to leave for stupid reasons! I decided about a year ago that I will no longer try to date women with kids. When I have talked to them in the past, I always find out they left the fathers of their children for stupid reasons. And that means any one of them would leave me for the same reason in the future. And they’d do it to you too! Of course, I ask women without kids how their past relationships ended too. If I find out that past relationships ended for stupid reasons, then I’m out.
I have been perusal your articles for a while. I totally respect most all your views, hey I’m a woman. I am hoping to get my youngest son to watch your website. He just got his heart broken after he nurtured and loved emotionally and financially back to health. Then his time expired. And at least she was honest, she said thank you but I don’t need you anymore.
Once I hit a financial fall my ‘loving’ wife lost hope in any future potential. I also had an eye accident that at the time may have ended my ability to work ( I got better ) . Her only concern was : “but can you still go to work?” She was a big face booker and instagrammer. I left her but only because she had become unbearable to live with and always out with others and not me. This law is definitely true.
I really liked the article and the drive. It’s amazing how the topic is universal. I’m from Spain and women here are just like that, selfish and only interested in you if they can get something in return. I’m 43 and single, no kids, I feel more and more lucky each day as I see many friends getting divorced and ending up with the worst end of the deal.
Yes. Wholeheartedly agreed but sometime hypergamy doesn’t mean she’ll go for another man in the physical. My experience is not unique but worth noting. My wife became a Jehovahs Witness and our relationship hit the rocks. When I would not comply with her requests to become a Witness too. It became obvious. This is where logic and reason hits the wall with women’s feelings. Our marriage broke up because I was of no use to her. My relaxed atheism did not fit in with her new lifestyle and beliefs. It didn’t help that their doctrines discourage contact with non-believers. When she said I was ‘dangerous’ to her spritual growth i think you can grasp the frame of the relationship at that point. Even being relaxed eventually about her religion, even though my objections of being a spiritual cuckold had already caused a rift, their doctrines crept into the bedroom wrecking what little we had left of the marriage. I’d class this as Hypergamy because she was looking for better. She found it in the ‘feelings’ of devotion to the holy spirit and Jesus. She had everything in the organisation, her friends and her new boyfriend Jesus Christ and Jehovah who was going to provide everything including eternal life with paradise on earth. Hard one to beat huh? Yup. Odd I know, but to me, she’d left me for another man and her blueprint had changed for the doctrines of the religion. She’d been brought up in the USSR. Uncanny but the group control mechanism of cults is very Soviet in nature. However, the crux now is she still wants to help and support her even after 5 years of separation.
As Jordan Peterson and Alfred Hitchcock have said, the face is the most interesting thing a human can look it. Intercutting between the 2 POVs would be cool. “He didn’t give me enough attention.” “He didn’t give me my space.” “He was boring.” “He was lacking in oomph.” Whatever that means. “I found out he didn’t have as much money as he said he had.” This from a woman in her 50s married for 20 years. I’ve heard so many ridiculous reasons.
It simply speaks as to why you can not project a man’s value system on woman, who’s nature will guide and drive her to do otherwise. They do not consider any equity you may place in the relationship. All she is concern with is how she feels and she will be unwavering in the pursuit to just feeling better…no matter whom she hurts. Mais Tarde
Richard, I love the new type of article. Its a good rule and definitely one to always keep in the back of your mind. It reminds me of the quote that whoever tries the hardest in a relationship, usually loses. It’s amazing how much your life can improve if you focus on yourself and your own wants. It may sound selfish, but you are foolish if you don’t think others are doing the same.
My current to be ex-wife, was a great wife up until her 2 boys, wanted to live with their dad. Instead of them being honest and just saying they wanted that, they started making situations, and they eventually moved to be with their dad, because I was mean and difficult. That was when it really ended. That WAS 4 YEARS ago!! 😂 😂 We’ve stayed together, but I really have no idea why. Where were these articles in 2009??? I would have never married her or even dated her, had I had this valuable information. Thanks for your work. I’ve only been using your techniques for 2 weeks, and I’m already Chasing Excellence, and seeing results.
I had a friend who is six figure earner, financially independent type who dated and married a single mom. She up and told him one day out of the blue that she no longer loved him and wanted a divorce. Prior to marriage, she was a struggling single mom working 2-3 jobs and saw him as a “way out”. She racked up $100k in debt, which he wasn’t aware of, and found another guy not to long after the split. Now, to her credit it didn’t get nasty as far as I know and things ended more less as best as they could. I suspected she was a good digger when he first met her and turns out that suspicion was correct. Oh, plus she saw herself as a victim and didn’t take responsibility for much of anything.
It’s true. The what have you done for me lately shows up in different forms, but it does. No matter what you do, there’s no such thing as relational equity. You can be right there through the worst times and a year later it can be like you weren’t even there or it didn’t happen. Just understand how this stuff works guys
this law is absolute truth. I can’t tell you how many times i’ve gotten with women when i told them about the big projects that i’m working on and who the have legitimate potential to turn out. They love it, claim they love the creativity, intelligence, and future forward thinker that i am, but about 3 months later they leave with a really dumb answer to follow. Idk about them, but building apps, prototype car engines, and investing into stock usually takes a decent amount of time to turn out strong.
The initial 3 point description made it sound like the relationship credit card. Rather than her paying with savings, she gets her perks on credit. When it comes time to repay, she’s got no cash (or just doesn’t wanna pay), defaults, and goes and applies for another credit card with a better lender. To tie it in with SMV, she eventually goes bankrupt. Lol
This reinforces (Rollo’s) advice for men to be their own mental point of origin; considering one’s self first. That way, when a women dumps you, you’re not thinking of the relationship, but rather thinking about yourself, your future and the next step to keep you going on the path you were on before you met her and while you were with her. This method is the best for uninterrupted “continuation” in a man’s path in life and goals. Be your own mental point of origin the minute you wake up in the morning, my fellow brothers. 💪
Yeah, it is funny how many marriages end around the 7-10 year point. My understanding is that many states, alimony does not kick in until around the 7-10 year point. It would be interesting if any studies on average length of marriage and if there is a correlation with years of marriage to collect alimony.
Mothers usually refer to the children as “Her children”. It is natural to think this way. The child grows inside her and she goes through the discomfort, pain and risk to birth them. At a visceral level they are hers and most people understand the “mother bear” concept. Even when she does not want them it is often because the weight of having them is to much to bear. Fathers can become a threat to her when the children prefer the father over her which is often now that fathers provide the fun and the mother the rules instead of the father being the disciplinarian (role reversal). At the same time young son’s may see the father as a competitor for the mothers attention and want him gone. Daughters may feel the first sexual stirrings with fathers as that primitive response to the “sexual other” but daughters also recognize mothers are the same as them and the bond with Mother goes deeper than with Father. The father remains the other. Once there are children the father is pushed into an outer obit around mother and children. Some fathers gladly accept this because of the freedom it offers but others feel rejected. Whatever truth there may be to Briffaults Law it will be expressed through the non sexual ménage à trois between Mother, Father and child(ren). Most mothers will push a father out of the relationship if he becomes a threat to her children as the relationship she is having with them. For better or worse women are at their most selfish even when they appear to be acting selflessly when it comes to the children.
The solution is stay single, play the field, let the lady prove herself to you. See her for what she is. Let her pay her own way. Keep her enticed but let her tell you what she wants. Keep all assets protected. Don’t show off, but keep it at a level where it keeps her guessing. Women will eventually tell all.. their true nature. If you truly are in love, she will feel it too. Soulmate connection is when two minds are as if they are one. All else is a conditional one for users and abusers.
I liked the camera position. Never rode in an Audi before. I felt a little short being I couldn’t see the road that good, but it was a good ride and I could hear you just fine. keep up the good work!! love the content This article sounds correct to me. We had a child together. I adopted her/our child she had from a previous marriage. She never recieved child support from the ex busband so I guess she needed a new victim. less than a year after I caught her cheating on me. we tried to work things out since but had a few more questionable situations. we talked about divorcing and I told her she could keep the house if she bought me out. She got her house, a child, and her other child adopted. The only thing she needs from me now is the child support and she is working on that.
IDK, I’ve been married almost 25 yrs. Though we are not rich, I am a stay at home, work from home, homeschooling mom! Yeah, I do get board but I realize my happiness and content comes from within, from God given talents and desires. I do not expect my hubby or my teens to please me. I could find a comfortable life in Miami via another man but I know that happiness and contentment comes from within.
Hypergamy does not care in what the man has given or sacrificed for her, if she is bored and looking for a better deal – there is no “credit” return for him. Where as the man feels as if he has invested in a bad deal or got robbed, hypergamy is using her power (it’s just how they are naturally and lawfully in a feminized society) while beta man is lost and fooled. It’s sad, and blatantly obvious when it comes to money, it’s usually always about Money in the end. Not emotions, ethics or compassion or even love. Hopes this made any sense? /I’d rather see vids from the original view.
100% accurate. New view: it’s good to experiment and try new approaches; no doubt you’ll play with this angle for a bit. My tuppence is I prefer your previous angle as I like seeing the face/eyes of the presenter as opposed to the back of their head. Keep your vids coming – they add real value to red pill aspiring mofos like moi. That Rollo Tomassi book is like Morpheus.
Video aspect was fine, a little different than your usual stuff. It felt like you were driving me (the viewer) and conversing with me. No need to keep looking or trying to look at the camera (the viewer) as to see your delightful chops from this angle is impossible. Watch the road and say what you have to say, for me it works great and I can watch the road with you. 🙂
Oh my god I have not been able to express how I feel out words in my mouth to jumble out This was fucking brilliant I willing gave her all my alpha my being watched her screw it over Claimed I had a real mental health problem Ye I did I allowed my love and deep want of family castle to drive me away from my core my being my manhood Yes I was mentally unwell I can see now just how much I allied her to drag me down in all facets of my being How did I let her do that, At least in this there is reason sense maths and logic You have just hit me with the cold hard volcanic truth of our times Just three months ago I was a breathe away from suicide and can honestly say there was not anything stopping me not even my three kids Your words not the beating hearts of my children gave me so much insight in such a short time I can feel in me myself if only the small mouldy scraps There is a huge fog in my life smoke clouded judgement and blame Thank you I can just start to see whats broken whats my own doing and where I have been mauled ( obviously I have watched a few of your articles to date ) This one gets me the most I could never understand my use by date, She is fifty next year with three kids under 8 Has demanded 100 percent custody Those poor kids, honestly I have not one friend or family member who thinks that even trying will help with there state and futures Of my kids
Im under the impression that most women are fully aware of their relationships with men based under this law. The issue is that the whole female culture is about manipulation to get what they want… and they couldn’t get away with so much, and would have to take responsability for their deceptions, if they admitted to completely knowing of their desire and intentions to use people. That way it’s always the excuse of “I didn’t know” or “It just happened” instead of taking responsibility or telling the truth.
I think our instincts were developed in another time. That time doesn’t currently exist. I agree there is Hypergamy in potentially every male female dating situation today. I think it is more prominent in single mothers which makes a lot of sense. I have had similar experiences with single mothers and this is just one item on a list of negatives for dating single moms.
That fuckin’ gearbox! I love it! The view was ok, it was kinda awkward, great for the driving experience, detached for the message of the article itself. I think that facebook has a lot to do with women’s boredom. So they see all these fantastic happy adventurous pics from their “friends” and all of a sudden their lives seem boring in comparison.
Kind of like the old format. I like the shots in the car with you facing the camera. Interesting to see the city in the background. Maybe you could drive and talk in scenic areas in the city. Maybe a second camera facing out the windshield of the car for scenic views, you could edit in the article (maybe not, just brainstorming). Maybe a brief explanation in the beginning on where you are driving in the beginning of the article. I think the car is a good format on dating tips, traits of women etc. With the shots in your home where you do interviews with guests online or where you need to draw on the board to explain a subject, maybe a little more interesting background. Maybe a window in the background, if you have interesting scenery at your house or maybe interesting architecture in your house. I think the chest art you have in the background might be a distraction to the conversation. Set design on late night talk shows might be a good reference for you home shots in that they usually have scenic views (fake) in the backgrounds or have interesting set designs. It is probably used to catch peoples eyes so they do not switch websites. I look at some other you tubers and it sometimes looks like they are in a cubical with a boring background. I probably will skip or give them less time, unless the subject is interesting. No trying to be negative, I enjoy your articles, just trying to make your website more successful and just wanted to brainstorm on some ideas you might want to incorporate.
Case in point, even if her hypergamy isn’t prevalent due to demonstration of high value and dread game, she will push to go out and claim you haven’t been out in forever, even if forever was last week. That’s why a weekly or bi weekly date night or some different activity is necessary, they will get bored and then hypergamy steps in. It’s true to say women are expensive for this very reason. All things considered, it seems there’s always a clock ticking. If you don’t reset the clock constantly the clock is going to get wound by the it guy at her work while your at work or home with your kid. Make yourself your own center, know that women are at best temporary. Apply game, chase your own greatness, and come from an abundance mindset.
Nice car BTW. Never heard of Briffaults law before today but it does seem consistent with the Darwinian notion of things. While I’ve never been very good with the ladies, I’ve seen quite a number of examples. My own mother and grandmother have been guilty of it with my father and grandfather, as well as the treacherous nature of friends’ former girlfriends.
Never heard this law before .. nor seen this website… One thing I can say truthfully about my love… She is almost an anomaly… Almost… She is probably the least against this Law….. almost, she has her needs… That said, I’ll take hers over many others… At least she is genuine and doesnt take advantage in so so many ways…. Especially monetary wise… Damn right refuses at time… That being said.. and remember I said almost, and stated she has needs… She needs emotional security, and so applies… It can be tough really… All in, I consider myself lucky that her biggest need is This… At least she isn’t trying to eat my wallet to shreds…. And she is truly fantastic!! She struggles and reaaally needs a high degree of consolation and support… Which is good grounds for a great relationship and marriage as a whole… If we communicate and have boundaries… Example. I shower after work immediately before addressing her internal struggle with the days challenges… I will agree with this law… Even the best of women, fall into this law…. Hense law… I do my best always… That said, I’m only human… Effort and determination given is all I can promise… As we are now.. I hope it’s enough.. In a content standpoint… Well explained, and also entertaining too. First time I’ve seen this content, as a 35 year old man… I enjoyed this. It’s both interesting, and intriguing. … You pass that diesel good sir!!! Don’t lose that license!!! 😆😆😆
The single mother date at 5.40!!! I experienced this with a single mother. I was banging her though and in a conversation before I left her place (used to be his) for my own home she told me she had left the husband because she was bored. Oh and they had only been broke up a month. I ended seeing her soon after a couple more bangs.
I personally like the cam view cause it kind of breaks up all the standard stuff we always see. Another angle might be with the cam in the passenger seat maybe with a half/half view of the window and the gear shift. Just a thought, not sure if it would be feasible. Good vid by the way, I don’t think we can beat Briffaults law enough. I just wish I was told this stuff back in Highschool and Jr. High (Just turn 39 for prospective btw). That said I might not have listened to it anyway but at least I would be able to say “Shit, You were right” (typicaly said to your dad.) Anyway, keep the vids coming, love your stuff.
Very interesting Richard so from what you saying I’m gonna draw to my own conclusion there is not much point or benefit for a man to be in a committed relationship because of the inevitable which will take place at some point her doing the dumping what ever reason she feels justified in her mind then she’ll up grade. Well well there not anything that can be done to limit this situation I believe even if a man is doing he’s best and improving himself all the time as much as he can she will never be content fully. So I would as a man just as you got her in your life always always be prepared to loose her at any time try to have a detached mindset and save yourself guys the hurt ache. Just my opinion. Nice topic Rich 😀
A strong relationship is built on open honest communication. You can’t fault a woman or a man for doing what they want when they want. In fact that is to be celebrated. Nobody owes you ANYTHING in this life unless you engage in a committed relationship where both PEOPLE agree to talk openly and honestly despite their urges to hide things about what they need and want in the relationship and engage in a relationship where things/behaviors ARE expected and things are OWED. If at any point either party is unhappy for any reason then that person MALE or FEMALE if enlightened and living their best life discusses it with their partner and each partner decides what to do openly and creates a story for themselves of what happened in the event and moves forward. The best clinical psychologists have been saying this for years. Good luck to you guyz! Much luv Rich 💙
@ Richard Cooper, This should apply to Narcissistic, Sociopath, & ESPECIALLY Psychopathic Women ONLY. These women with those “toxic” traits are really the only ones that practice this law. That is the hardcore FACTS. I am 44 years of age and during my time living on this planet, I have yet to meet a woman to practice this law WITH OUT those traits. A sane, normal, mentality stable woman just wouldn’t practice (or abide), by this law. No WAY; No HOW…..
Not sure about the backseat deal if your ok with it continue. My last relationship. Thinking back. She got all she asked for, but when she ended up in that life. She bailed. What do I know 58 with a 5 year old. Put in everything, built new home 50k in IVF for a baby, stay at home mom and I foot the bill for all. Right after the baby got here I started getting the I’m not happy shit, so I filed for divorce, lost half my assets, Again. I’m telling kids now including my son, marriage is just a legal license to steal half and in some cases up to 60% of your wealth when their done with you. It’s like severance pay for ass. Wtf Peace Pappy
hyper gammy…is that like a really energetic grandmother? 🙂 NO worries dude, there are some words and names no matter how hard I try I just can’t say correctly. I worked with a guy whose name was spelled Essa. In English, that’s ESS SA but he pronounced it EEE SA. One of my site bosses on the construction site was Issac. I pronounced in like Issac Hayes. HE pronounced it IZZIC. One time a fellow worker mocked my pronunciation and the guy rolled his eyes “really”…I turned to him and said “yes really, not my fault you pronounce your name wrong. tell me, how many Z’s are in your name? WHAT NONE! RIGHT, no z’s so it shouldn’t be pronounced that way. I’m going to start calling you CHARDAY another one who should be called SADE. You can start calling me BRZynski….I spell it M I K E though…..
if you’re serious about wanting a beautiful chick who treats you really well, you can save up the 20k needed to find (the first one) in a year or less. Just live in an old minivan on the $80 per week sales of your plasma, Youc can eat free at churches and the SA mission, get around on a bicycle and clean up at a $20 per month, 24-7 gym. I know this cause i did it. Get a $12,000 per year college loan. The $6000 per year Pell grant need not be repaid and it will cover tuition and fees at a cheap college. You can save every dime of your take home check from work. Once you get one that will reimburse you, that’s the last you spend on one.
Very interesting info re: Robert Briffault. I have couple of questions. ● Do you keep male friends around when they are no longer a benefit to you or if they become a significant liability, do you Go Your Own Way? ● A promise of future benefit doesn’t matter. Okay, again with your men friends, an example might be borrowing tools or equipment or money. A future benefit is promised, but never materializes, so what do you do? ● Promise of a Future benefit: the Present is an important thing. If the Present isn’t going well then, a Future promise may never occur. Clearly, Materialistic Gain is not the only issue of significance. Alot of what Briffault thought could apply to relationships in general. Most of it is common sense. If a relationship is a liability, it is essential to recognize that. It doesn’t matter who the relationship is with or what it’s nature is. It could be strictly a legitimate business relationship. Think of all the sexual terms people use when they find themselves cheated by a bad commercial deal (dicked over, screwed, f*cked over). When a relationship of any kind becomes a liability, it is often best To Go Your Own Way. (I know there can be extenuating circumstances and people go thru a variety of hardships. I am not heartless, but I have had to end both Romantic Relationships with Men and even, Frienships with women. I don’t think he knew everything there is to know about families or women (although lots of men think they know it all. Insert: smiley). Regarding your experience with the Single Mother, her first and main responsibility, of course, you know this, (not excluding the importance of her own Self-Care) is to her Children.
Yeah, this law is just stating the obvious: 1.) Generations taught selfish values 2.) No more social structures in place to motivate people to remain faithful towards each other. 3.) There are core psychological differences between male and female brains… blame evolution for this. 4.) The female brain is not wired for bonding, but for getting the best deal possible, at all times. This law just moves beyond money, as you say, to include other reasons, such as emotional support, etc. for why women dump men for seemingly better ones on a whim. Basically, the solution is to return to a traditional. conservative society; until that happens… you can hope for a unicorn but your best bet is to protect yourself financially and emotionally from women. It’s sad, but you have to see women as sexual gratification objects. It’s really sad, because the men lose out: no one to grow old with, no families, no joy from having a bonded partner. Men are wired for chasing after beautiful bodies, but they’re also the true romantics in that, they will pair bond and give everything they can to try to make their family happy.
format’s ok EiC, just don’t crash, like some chick doing makeup while driving 🤣 I only found the term “Briffault’s Law” after experiencing same in my life. doh! I should have studied more a long time ago. I instead assumed women are like me and will respond to kindness with loyalty. me dummy 🤪 after I learned the hard way, and before finding Briffaults Law, I thought to consider men and women like cats and dogs. I’ll just stick to cats for now. as long as the Friskies is out along with shelter and pets, the cat will be around. she’ll disappear instantly otherwise. the cat will still totally go to a neighbor for more if given the opportunity 😼 conclusion- the woman you’re with is a pet, like a cat. some are low-maintenance. shoot for that if you wish one around. it looks that that’s the best that is possible you can do. no Friskies and it’s goodbye, you can even expect the claws on her way out. line up protection for the inevitable 😎
The words used in all forms of relating advice for men is entirely wrong at least in the wording. “isn’t or won’t” is often a lie. It’s not true without using terms that describe perception. It’s never true if the words describe a an experience as though it’s true when it often isn’t rather than words that specifically describe it as how it is perceived.
hey bald dude, can you tell us you name? intro,s. i like your content. and because of that i don,t care if you were in a hammock, but your style is very good too, but content is no.1 for me. i do agree that there is truth in what you have said. however, i certainly wouldn,t tar most females with the same brush, so to say. thanks
i am a guy ..what would happen if a woman was useless to a guy ? swap the corollaries pls. this law makes no sense. nature is not perfect, our expectations of woman are not and neither are we. lets be fair and evaluate this like real men. lets not blame everything on woman, rather the design of nature itself. Let go one step above this. Polarities are not just reversed, but have different traits…..All the alpha talk is crap. As a guy you need to evolve yourself, above the alpha, beta, omega. Above the animalistic desire, that imprint of the blueprint from the animal kingdom passed on. The thing that differentiates men from a stray dogs is intelligence and outcome is creation/invention. Society/TV told you you need to be an alpha and plow woman. Be the tough guy. Sure we have carnal desires that will temporary satisfy you for the moment. Was Einstein, Nikola Tesla, Newton, Galileo alpha male ??? By your definition they are most undesirable lowly class, yet it was these lowly undesirables that pushed us to the next level. Transistors, electronics, nano technology, space age not from alphas…….Buff/Tough guys are in the military/police/acrobats/Olympians/firefighters. However they are puppets of politicians, who cant even bench press 2x45lbs. So intelligence >>> alpha. What do MGTOW’s really want ??? Most of them here are in their 20’s some 30’s who want to have sex with many women. And Woman just don’t want that. They want to capture you like a sphere around planet/star. And will do so and make as many men swing to their will.
Tbh, I don’t see how this can be classified as “red pill” information. It’s common knowledge that there are no guarantees in life, and this naturally applies to relationships (sexual or otherwise). People can walk away whenever they want, whenever they feel like it, and it happens frequently because we’re all motivated by our individual interests. Yep, human beings given are propelled forward by pure, unbridled selfishness.
I would not take any one person’s word alone as what went wrong and why something ended. That would take a lot of time hearing from everyone directly involved before I form anything close to a conclusion. Otherwise, the first person to come to you is right and everyone else is wrong in your mind. It’s just not true. Most PT articles are anecdotally based on and/or supported by one sided accounts and/or statistics based on the same. I had plenty of arguments under their posts that popped up in my FB feed. A lot of those posts disappeared (why I can’t prove the rest of this sentence) and articles popped up that agreed more with me. I don’t have a psychology degree. I just spent countless hours listening to people who deal with all other kinds of people productively and attached my own experiences with that.
I dont get it. why do you want your woman to stay for more than 3-4 years? Aint you ready for something new by then? Go to the third world and make your pitch of $24,000 of pell grants (need not be repaid) and $50k of college loans (very low interest while still in college at least half time). Millions of lovely,smart young women will take you up on that deal! It takes about a year to get her US visa and 3 years for her to become a US citizen. If you divorce before she’s a citizen, she’ll be deported and can’t return to the US for ten YEARS, no matter WHAT!. So you’re assured of either 3 years of very fine treatment from her, or you drop her and go get another one just like her. The day she gets her US citizenship is the day you divorce her and get another one. You can get one that will pay her own way, for 2 years, while she becomes a sonogram tech, able to clear 50k per year. then she pays her own way and gives you $400 per week, clear, for the third year, reimbursing you for the cost of finding her and getting her into the US.
Just got dropped by a single mom, and the kids, especially her son was an huge problem acting out alot causeing tress in the household. I put on alot of weight during the relationship, and I’m pretty sure between the chaos with her kids and my weight gain she eventually decided to move on…I spent thousands of dollars on her the year prior to her leaving and she became a born again Christian and said I needed to he a man of God if I wanted to marry her…After several months of trying to find God the way she had it was clear I was not on fire for Jesus the way she was…She left me and married another man 3 weeks after breaking things off with me…I’m now single with our 2 and a half year old child we had together… Her 5th and my first and I’m 80ish pounds over weight and feeling like a failure… I know I lost her attraction to me and that’s on me. When we met, I was on a weight loss journey and after getting with her I stopped pursuing my goals and eventually it ended…sorry for the long story…But even though I can’t help but feel sad and bad for myself I got lazy and lost of drive…I’m currently 15 pounds down with another 75 to go. What I’m realizing is no matter how good a person you are or how many kind or nice gestures you do for a women if you are not pursuing excellence or maintaining it you will end up like me…I’m back on the path now, and I will never allow myself to be in this place again fat and feeling bad for mysellf after a breakup…Work hard in the gym, be kind, become financially stable and I’m trusting the process.
I think I’ve more or less heard everything now, when I hear that a woman said she divorced her husband because “all her husband wanted to do when he came in from work was to be with the family with the kids and with her and be a father and she found that boring.” Most women just live in a dream world with their fantasies formed mainly from the blue pill Matrix system. The ROM COMS, soap operas, game shows, feed these delusions which they then attempt to turn into reality using other people (namely men) Of course this illusion must inevitably end in disillusionment and disappointment because they have not thought things through. Many women in England would love a man like the one she had as they often complain about husbands perusal too much football, drinking, drug taking, spending time with ‘the boys’ etc. Have you ever had the feeling you just can’t win lol